Jump to content

Google announces Project Fi: Partners with Sprint and T-Mobile for Network Access (previous title: Google to start it's own Wireless Service; using T-Mobile/Sprint for it's Network Footprint.)


IamMrFamous07

Recommended Posts

I don't see how this is realistic.  The effective minimum bill (with miniscule data use) is $21/mo.  Over two years that's only a $504 outlay.  If we assume the Nexus 5 was sold at cost like many sources say it was, that means Google only makes $150 over two years on this customer on the actual service.   The prices may be off a bit on the data at $10/GB, but they're definitely not going to be giving away a device that costs them $350, let alone over $500 to make.  The data prices need to go down the more you use, or something more realistic.

Sure but I bet the average user is probably at like 2-3GB which probably puts it at $40ish which is $960. Even if they are between your estimates and my estimates then Google does alright. They don't have any physical network to support or huge outlays of capital here and if we are honest this doesn't appear to be something Google is super heavily invested in going forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure but I bet the average user is probably at like 2-3GB which probably puts it at $40ish which is $960. Even if they are between your estimates and my estimates then Google does alright. They don't have any physical network to support or huge outlays of capital here and if we are honest this doesn't appear to be something Google is super heavily invested in going forward. 

 

They're not going to offer something which is going to let you effectively get free service in any possible combination where service+phone is less than just buying the unlocked phone, period.  And I have to believe G wants a true contract-free option here, so options are limited.  So I have no problem with them offering the device at full unlocked price (it would be nice if the device itself would be cheaper, but that is orthogonal).  My only problem is the data pricing.  I'd like to see $10 for first GB, and $5 thereafter.  But it's pretty clear this is a "beta" (if that, maybe an "alpha"), so we'll see how it evolves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the business hours at their retail store. Life must be a little slower in Bozeman, MT.

No Sundays, no Mondays and not open until noon Tuesday through Saturday... I could live with that.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems like there is also tethering included in this which is best.

 

Which should frankly be the industry standard. If you're already paying to use data then it shouldn't matter how you use it. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the business hours at their retail store.  Life must be a little slower in Bozeman, MT. 

No Sundays, no Mondays and not open until noon Tuesday through Saturday... I could live with that.

 

Hey, I work 24/7.

 

That is 24 hours a week, 7 months out of the year.

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like the general consensus is, "It doesn't make it cheaper for my usage pattern, therefore sucks."

 

This is interesting because it's more about cross-carrier / wifi handoff experiment than anything else. The only reason why this is such a big news is because it's Google, if a no-name upstart was behind this, it would be a blip in the tech world and only relevant in the wireless world.

 

Pretty much from a purely pricing POV, there are better options whether you are a heavy / light user of data / voice in any combination and I'm sure this was intentional. Google isn't going to make any profit from this experiment and pricing it too low would just get the carriers to not sign on.

Edited by coccydynia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google is doing what son couldn't...

Merge Tmo/sprint... Its a little more expensive but it you believe what sprint is doing and add in Tmo you should theoretically have the best data experience, and be on par with att/Verizon. Which is something sprint can't do yet as they are still building out. Something Tmo can't do yet as they don't have enough in building coverage yet..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What changes would have to be made for iPhone to have this?

Baseband changes? iPhone has wifi calling and wifi to volte.

Only special thing is if SIM card. Doesn't seem like modification is required.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well the biggest change necessary would be for Apple to allow for this. Which is possible but unlikely because there's not really any benefit for Apple.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there harm?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Google would have to modify iOS to integrate the network switching and Hangouts, which Apple most likely considers to be "harm".

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google would have to modify iOS to integrate the network switching and Hangouts, which Apple most likely considers to be "harm".

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Or apple could just do this itself, get same

Or better terms and make some pocket change. Apple truly doesn't need to

Make ANY money off of this.

 

And this model is scalable to other countries.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what some of you are bickering about, but this is a pretty good offering from Google. I've had months where I use 1 GB and months I use 5 GB. Hopefully every provider adopts crediting unused data to it's customers. Also add the fact that your phone will automatically pick the least congested network, and data experience should be better than being in a single network MVNO.

 

Also, international roaming may not be as good as T-Mobile or Sprint, but its still better than any other MVNO, Verizon, or AT&T. I take comfort in seeing this as a pattern of where the wireless industry is headed as far as international roaming goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or apple could just do this itself, get same

Or better terms and make some pocket change. Apple truly doesn't need to

Make ANY money off of this.

And this model is scalable to other countries.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Think like Apple - what could they possibly gain? They have larger margins elsewhere to chase. There are better ideas to capitalize than a MVNO for Apple. For Google, more users in their ecosystem = more ad revenue. That's not Apple's game...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone else notice Google will let you buy a nexus 6 for this with their own version of easy pay?

 

If you need a new Nexus 6 to use with Project Fi, you can buy one direct from us when you sign up. You can select the "Midnight Blue" Nexus 6 in two storage sizes—32GB ($649) and 64GB ($699), plus applicable taxes, with two ways to pay: all at once or over 24 months.

If you choose to pay for your Nexus 6 over 24 months, it is $27.04/month for the 32GB option and $29.12/month for the 64GB option. There's no interest or fees. However, a credit check is required to be eligible for this pricing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Yes! That does keep it from wandering off Dish and most importantly, reconnecting immediately (at least where their is n70). Thanks!
    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...