Jump to content

Google announces Project Fi: Partners with Sprint and T-Mobile for Network Access (previous title: Google to start it's own Wireless Service; using T-Mobile/Sprint for it's Network Footprint.)


IamMrFamous07

Recommended Posts

Signed up for an invite, can't wait to try it out. Does anybody know how voice works? Is it VOIP? If so it won't work on 2G networks which the coverage map shows...? If I make a call on Tmobile's network will it hand off to Sprint's if I run out of TMO's coverage and vise versa.. Wouldn't that require 4G and VOIP? Can I make it prefer one network to the other? I have a lot of questions can't wait to learn the "in's and outs" of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any market that tmo has significantly better coverage than sprint?

Maybe Houston? Coverage isn't bad considering they use AWS for LTE. I've been meaning to find a way to test out their new 700 MHz LTE but they are barely releasing phones that support that band.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My sense is that this isn't Google trying to be disruptive now so much as Google beta testing the idea of carrier-agnostic, ubiquitous wireless mobility in the United States with a view to the eventual, disruptive step of removing the carrier completely from the customer experience. Sprinkle in some access to Project Loon, and you're getting to the point where you should eventually be able to access the Internet at decent speeds anywhere on the planet without large-scale land-based infrastructure.

 

The way I see it: when Project Loon becomes ubiquitous, the vision is that you'll be on the Internet everywhere directly via Google most of the time, with Loon and/or WiFi pushing text messages, voice calls, and low-priority background data, with the land-based carriers functioning more as big wireless access points for when you're not near WiFi and either your neighborhood Loon is unavailable or you need a burst of foreground data that they can deliver more efficiently.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google isn't in it to start a price war, they're trying to show the carriers a better way of operating a network and using resources efficiently. This is a experiment more than anything so If you're a data hungry customer you may want to stay away.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to this article, it meets or beats most (minus the Unlimited plans from Sprint and T-Mobile).

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/google-unveils-wireless-service-called-project-fi-1429725928

 

**Image Credit: The Wall Street Journal Online

 

BT-AB392B_GOOGL_16U_20150422192406.jpg

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My sense is that this isn't Google trying to be disruptive now so much as Google beta testing the idea of carrier-agnostic, ubiquitous wireless mobility in the United States with a view to the eventual, disruptive step of removing the carrier completely from the customer experience. Sprinkle in some access to Project Loon, and you're getting to the point where you should eventually be able to access the Internet at decent speeds anywhere on the planet without large-scale land-based infrastructure.

 

The way I see it: when Project Loon becomes ubiquitous, the vision is that you'll be on the Internet everywhere directly via Google most of the time, with Loon and/or WiFi pushing text messages, voice calls, and low-priority background data, with the land-based carriers functioning more as big wireless access points for when you're not near WiFi and either your neighborhood Loon is unavailable or you need a burst of foreground data that they can deliver more efficiently.

 

This makes a lot of sense - good post.

 

If Google plans to expand the use of loons and wifi, perhaps they could really shift things around and separate loon/wifi usage vs. LTE usage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signed up for an invite, can't wait to try it out. Does anybody know how voice works? Is it VOIP? If so it won't work on 2G networks which the coverage map shows...? If I make a call on Tmobile's network will it hand off to Sprint's if I run out of TMO's coverage and vise versa.. Wouldn't that require 4G and VOIP?

 

It's not known what the're doing for certain yet, but I suspect it's probably involves ringback handoffs. (Similar to how Republic Wireless hands off a phone call from VoIP to Sprint 1x). That solves the 2G problem -- it's not as 'nice' as IMS / VoLTE-WiFI / etc, but it works on any network type/carrier.

 

That's just an assumption on my part though. Can't know for sure until someone actually has it to investigate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any market that tmo has significantly better coverage than sprint?

 

I suppose it depends on how you define "market", but there are areas where T-Mobile's native footprint is larger than Sprints. Most of the ones I know of are out West. Parts of Northern California, Eastern Oregon and Idaho (Pendleton, La Grande, Baker City, Twin Falls, Idaho Falls, etc), rural Arizona (near Flagstaff). Parts of rural California / Nevada (Susanville, Patton Village, etc).

 

In most areas, Sprint's footprint is larger. Sometime's ridiculously larger (Sprint's probably more than double T-Mobile's footprint in Michigan and Wisconsin, as an example.).

 

But if you want to, you can find a list of small towns or highways where T-Mobile's native coverage is larger than Sprint's.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just talked to a ISP that we're on the boundary of their DSL territory and they are checking about running service to us. If so I think we'll switch to fi from unlimited my way. I wonder how roaming will work, e911 calls go to any service provider, right?

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if I have ever used 100+ minutes in any single billing cycle since the dawn of cell phones.

 

Really?

 

I was looking at my usage and over the years I've gone from 3,000-4,000 minutes to less than 1,000 now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really?

 

I was looking at my usage and over the years I've gone from 3,000-4,000 minutes to less than 1,000 now.

 

Chatty.  Cathy.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google is doing what son couldn't...

Merge Tmo/sprint... Its a little more expensive but it you believe what sprint is doing and add in Tmo you should theoretically have the best data experience, and be on par with att/Verizon. Which is something sprint can't do yet as they are still building out. Something Tmo can't do yet as they don't have enough in building coverage yet..

Is it possible to do CA cross carrier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to this article, it meets or beats most (minus the Unlimited plans from Sprint and T-Mobile).

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/google-unveils-wireless-service-called-project-fi-1429725928

 

**Image Credit: The Wall Street Journal Online

 

BT-AB392B_GOOGL_16U_20150422192406.jpg

Yes, but these comparison are biased and incomplete. For example it doesn't show sprint unlimited plan in the chart which is the same price as google's 3 gig plan. Further it only shows the cost of a single line which along with the low end I conceded that Google was cheaper. But for multilingual accounts, or 10 gigs and up Google is more expensive than even vzw and Att.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read the first asterisks.

Right, but it is not in the chart. As such the article is misleading and doesn't give an accurate comparison. It also doesn't show how multiple lines compare to google's plans which is also misleading. My point is this plans are not really all that competitive.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to turn this into an Android vs iPhone fan boy contest, but with the way Apple has lagged behind android and how they like to offer "Apple Only" services...not going to happen.

 

You're better off praying for Apple to start a similar service instead of them allowing google into their phones. Sorta like how Apple Pay came along way after Google Wallet was around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Houston? Coverage isn't bad considering they use AWS for LTE. I've been meaning to find a way to test out their new 700 MHz LTE but they are barely releasing phones that support that band.

Data definitely is better than Sprint here. Voice about the same

 

Sent from my SM-N910T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Data definitely is better than Sprint here. Voice about the same

 

Sent from my SM-N910T

 

From my experience, speeds are faster the majority of the time with T-Mobile, but my friends on T-Mobile will lose data or switch to 2g more often when indoors (at restaurants, houses, apartments, etc).  None of my friends with T-Mobile have a phone with band 12 though, so if Band 12 can fill in those holes then coverage wouldn't be an issue.

 

One thing in Texas - driving to Dallas, Austin, or San Antonio, basically a triangle in Texas, and people make this drive quite a bit, Sprint has LTE covered the entire way, while T-Mobile isn't quite there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cancel DSL, I'm getting fiber in a couple months. Any who do 911 calls go through any service provider tower?

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

That's a federal regulation (see http://www.fcc.gov/guides/emergency-communications) so it would have to.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks jaded, fi looks like a great in between for cell service whether or not you have a nexus 6. At least being the nexus 6 is on my short list for my next phone.

 

If you're not happy with your service you can get a nexus 6 and still be able to switch to most carriers because of the lack of contract.

 

Also a good way to test out sprint coverage or t mobile coverage in your area.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

Edited by gifters
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Yes! That does keep it from wandering off Dish and most importantly, reconnecting immediately (at least where there is n70). Thanks!
    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...