Jump to content

Google announces Project Fi: Partners with Sprint and T-Mobile for Network Access (previous title: Google to start it's own Wireless Service; using T-Mobile/Sprint for it's Network Footprint.)


IamMrFamous07

Recommended Posts

 

This just blows my mind.  Would you have to choose one service or the other?  Or would you get both?  It seems possible that you could have a SIM that could run on both networks.  Granted a data session or call would not hand over from one network to the other.  But you could go back and forth as necessary in between active calls and sessions.  It might work pretty well.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just blows my mind.  Would you have to choose one service or the other?  Or would you get both?  It seems possible that you could have a SIM that could run on both networks.  Granted a data session or call would not hand over from one network to the other.  But you could go back and forth as necessary in between active calls and sessions.  It might work pretty well.

Google be like, "Sprint/T-mo merger didn't happen, I make it happen."

  • Like 23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow.

 

Well... that was unexpected.

 

Edit: I wonder if this might lead to increased Google involvement in the 600 auction (if it happens). Maybe they'll go a step further and in addition to petitioning for open access requirements they can lend Sprint/T-Mobile some cash?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if it is an either/or type of purchase, or both.

 

Would be interesting to see if there was a way to provision a SIM to work on both networks simultaneously. Wouldn't make much sense though, considering the networks overlap in a lot of places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if it is an either/or type of purchase, or both.

 

Would be interesting to see if there was a way to provision a SIM to work on both networks simultaneously. Wouldn't make much sense though, considering the networks overlap in a lot of places.

 

It may work like StraightTalk, where you have to pick your network up front.  But it seems to me Google would come up with a more eloquent solution than that.  I would like to hear more details on the network side.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

another article @ http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/01/report-google-to-launch-wireless-service-this-year/

 

 

My guess is this;

 

google is going to use data only service, from either/both based on location/connection of phone, then route voice/sms over google voice (voip).

 

Also, it may add more overhead to the data transport, but they could VPN their data traffic directly to google data centers over whichever carrier, therefore essentially ignoring the network differences, and also keeping all user traffic snooping out of the hands of the carriers.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this is the answer to the questions regarding what carrier project Ara will be available on...

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

another article @ http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/01/report-google-to-launch-wireless-service-this-year/

 

 

My guess is this;

 

google is going to use data only service, from either/both based on location/connection of phone, then route voice/sms over google voice (voip).

 

Now that makes a lot of sense!  The ultimate Google Voice experience with data only.  Interesting.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may work like StraightTalk, where you have to pick your network up front.  But it seems to me Google would come up with a more eloquent solution than that.  I would like to hear more details on the network side.

 

That's what I was thinking as well. 

 

I'd love to see it as well.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just blows my mind. Would you have to choose one service or the other? Or would you get both? It seems possible that you could have a SIM that could run on both networks. Granted a data session or call would not hand over from one network to the other. But you could go back and forth as necessary in between active calls and sessions. It might work pretty well.

Maybe google will move the virtual sim forward.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if it is an either/or type of purchase, or both.

 

Would be interesting to see if there was a way to provision a SIM to work on both networks simultaneously. Wouldn't make much sense though, considering the networks overlap in a lot of places.

An att TMO hybrid makes more sense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya know, even cooler they can support multi-device voice/text using google voice.

 

I already do this, with nexus 5, iphone 6+ and nexus 7. With google voice integration and hangouts, I can make/receive voice and text (and hangout video calls) over all 3 devices. Text messages are kept in sync too.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am curious to see what their plans will look like.

 

Will they sell the Nexus 5/6 at a cheaper price since customers will be dealing with them directly? What type of support will they have for their devices? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely won't have unlimited.

Do you have anything to back that up? A MVNO can offer whatever they want to pay for. I don't know about T-Mobile, but Sprint is very open to wholesale business. You could become your own provider as a Sprint MVNO if you had the money.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have anything to back that up? A MVNO can offer whatever they want to pay for. I don't know about T-Mobile, but Sprint is very open to wholesale business. You could become your own provider as a Sprint MVNO if you had the money.

TMO sprint will sell wholesale at $/gig. I doubt google could afford to carry a customer if it costs google money to carry that customer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely won't have unlimited.

 

 

Google definitely wants you to use content, so they can track you and serve you ads.

 

I would expect that unlimited would be a given.

 

I would further expect, that it will be even cheaper if you 'opt in' to letting google track you at an even deeper level than they normally do.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just installed the update, and it's good!  As you recommended, I turned off both TA adjustments, and turned on displaying it when it's zero.  The value is basically spot-on.  It's bouncing between 18 and 19 for the Cameron Valley site, and it is in fact between 0.87 and 0.92 miles, as displayed in the app.  This is probably a better estimate of the TA values than any other device I own provides. As far as the -44 goes, I'll have to take it out and verify that it no longer records those cases. If this device didn't have that annoying reset problem, and got the Android 14 update (and in so doing supported TA on NR and continued to allow band locking), it would easily be the best device I own.  Easily.  And would be the device I standardize on for the 5G era.  I'll probably have to wait for a future device to come out with Android 14 and then see what happens. And I know I didn't have to, but I love SCP.  It is my primary tool for tracking the goings-on of the various networks and is very easy to use and work with across my 10 phones.  I am very happy to send a token of my appreciation your way now and then.  Thanks again! - Trip
    • Sorry, I misread your message -- yes, the app would show 0 if an invalid value was being reported. I don't think I had any MediaTek devices myself, but the beta testers have had a decent variety of devices over the years.   Sorry, I didn't word that very well in my last post -- I added an option to control display of LTE TA when it is 0. By default it will now be hidden (sadly a lot of devices do not show it) but anyone who wants to display it can adjust accordingly. There will be 3 user-selectable options related to LTE TA now -- the existing correction option, correction on LTE-TDD (which is independent/in addition to the existing correction option), and TA:0 display. In your case, I'd disable the TDD option and enable the TA:0 option; the defaults will be the opposite of what I think you need.   You did not have to do that, but I sincerely appreciate it, thank you! Beta update is rolling out now, let me know how it goes.
    • In order: This is very helpful to know.  Thanks. That makes a lot of sense, though it's showing me zero rather than nothing; it looks like if it's calculating a negative number, I'm seeing zero instead.  It makes me wonder how many devices you've tested against which use the MediaTek chipset.  This is only the second one I've used, and the first one was very, very old (didn't have B41), so it's possible that the MediaTek chip doesn't need the correction while others do.  Separately, I doubt that a real world case will ever see 1282, so I imagine any value above 1281 could be ignored. I would ask you to please not hide TA values of 0, or if you hide them by default, add an option to not hide them.  I am aware that, for example, the S22 doesn't report a valid TA value and always reports zero, but zero is a legitimate value and is useful to know when trying to identify sites. I'll look forward to your impending update, and I'm going to send along another donation if I can find the link.  Thanks so much, as always!  - Trip
    • I received the reports, thanks! You didn't catch it happening (it captures the diagnostics as soon as you hit send or long-click the connection banner on the main screen), and I had sent you an e-mail to clarify which value was -3.. but your screenshots confirmed my hunch that you meant RSRQ!   I know exactly what is happening here. Somewhere along the way, I learned that TD-LTE bands (33-53) needed a TA correction of -19 applied, and I confirmed it on several devices. Perhaps that is no longer universally true.. but what you're seeing SCP display matches that correction. Below 19 you see nothing, at 19 you see 0, and above that you see TA-19. The upper limit is 1282, which is why you see 1263. Your phone must report 1282 when the TA is unknown, which is not technically safe but I can work around that. Funny enough, I had a change to TA coming in the next update that had nothing to do with your issues.. TA:0 will be hidden moving forward, since several devices report 0 when it cannot be identified. I'll have an app update out shortly that addresses all of this, let me know how it works for you and thanks for the detailed feedback!
    • Mike, We ended up going out this morning to do errands in spite of the tropical storm.  I locked the phone on LTE B41, turned off the TA correction checkbox, and watched it carefully while out and about.  I have four screenshots for you. https://imgur.com/a/kCPTCnB First, I happened to get a screenshot of it doing the -44 dBm thing.  I also tried to send you at least one set of diagnostics showing the -44 dBm but I don't know where precisely in the process it collects the diagnostics.  Hopefully there's something useful in them. The rest of the screenshots are far more interesting.  All three were taken within seconds of each other in the CVS parking lot.  The phone's diagnostic screen shows a TA of 17, and oddly, the SCP diagnostics screenshot also appears to show a TA of 17.  But SCP's normal display is showing 0.  Not entirely sure what to make of that.  It looks like SCP won't show me a value other than 0 until I hit about 19 according to the phone diagnostic screen. It also appears that when SCP is showing a TA of 1263, that's the equivalent of a null value for the TA--no TA is calculated.  The phone diagnostic screen appears to show just "12" when that's happening; the SCP diagnostic screen shows 1282 in the TA section when that happens, a difference of 19, which is highly convenient given what I noted above about the TA value.  (I can't test that the phone diagnostic screen is limited to two characters and is thus truncating 1282 to just "12" as I suspect given where I am right now.  Had I known to be looking for it, I'd have tested in the middle of nowhere yesterday.) Anything catch your eye?  Anything I can do to help more?  - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...