Jump to content

Report: Sprint to offer flagship Sony phone


newboyx

Recommended Posts

Nice! Now if Sprint could snag a high end Nokia Lumia windows phone and a nice Blackberry, the Passport or something along those lines, their handset lineup would be top notch.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.androidpolice.com/2014/08/29/sprint-rumored-offer-sony-xperia-smartphone-first-time/

 

 

Sounds pretty cool, I was intrigued by the xperia line and would be interested in seeing more sony phones on sprint.

 

edit thanks, didn't look in misc forum.

Edited by dedub
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why hello there

 

 

TOKYO— Sprint Corp. S -0.88% will sell Sony Corp.'s 6758.TO +1.22% next Xperia handset in the U.S. as part of a strategy to broaden its lineup of smartphone offerings to limit customer flight, a person familiar with the matter said.

 

Sprint parent SoftBank Corp. 9984.TO +3.36% will also supply the Sony flagship phone in Japan, the person said.

 

The decision would mark the first time for SoftBank to carry Sony's smartphones, and the deal would give Sony a firmer foothold in the huge U.S. market for its phone products—a pillar of its growth strategy.

 

 

Full article at:

http://online.wsj.com/articles/sprint-to-sell-next-sony-xperia-phone-in-u-s-1409305019

 

 

This Softbank thing might be pretty cool.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also would like to take this opportunity to say that I love my M8 but why could they not have done this 6 months ago!!! AAARRRRGGGGHHHHH! That is all.

I'm an HTC fanboy to the core but it would be nice to have a diverse array of choices beyond LG, Samsung, and HTC for my next upgrade!

 

My 200th post!

Edited by xdfgf
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another flagship waterproof phone that doesn't sacrifice bulk or design is always welcomed.

I just hope it packs the SD805 and not another 801. They'll probably want to cut cost margins though so it'll likely be an 801. The battery size is 3000+ too so that's good.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sony needs to put dollars into marketing.  When they learn to Market again then I could see them be a force.    

 

Remember, this a formula that has worked before. You can only get X phone on our network. They just need to put some marketing dollars behind the Sony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now add some Huawei, ZTE, lenovo, etc. and we're really cooking.  Plus, offer them at really competitive prices.

 

I wouldn't expect Huawei in the U.S. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope it packs the SD805 and not another 801. They'll probably want to cut cost margins though so it'll likely be an 801. The battery size is 3000+ too so that's good.

 

The problem with the Snapdragon 805 (APQ8084) is that it is just a processor; it has no integrated cellular baseband.  So, it needs to be paired with a Gobi baseband, probably either the MDM9235 or MDM9635.  The rest of the world will go with the MDM9235 because it is 3GPP only, whereas the MDM9635 is 3GPP/3GPP2.  Basically, with no integrated cellular baseband, a separate variant needs to be created for Sprint.

 

Now, compare that to the Snapdragon 801 (MSM8974AB/AC), which does have an integrated baseband.  And for the integrated baseband chipsets, Qualcomm covers both bases with 3GPP/3GPP2.  Since Sprint has already transitioned away from SVLTE to e/CSFB single radio architecture, no separate Sprint variant is necessary.  The same handset variant can be sold to operators around the world.  As long as the RF stack is already designed to support high frequency TD-LTE, then the CDMA2000 modes for Sprint need only be activated in firmware. 

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sony needs to put dollars into marketing.  When they learn to Market again then I could see them be a force.    

You are right. That should primarily be Sony's responsibility. Although we have no idea what was in the deal that Softbank and Sony reached. I think its pretty significant that Verizon is not getting this phone (at least in the short run).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its pretty significant that Verizon is not getting this phone (at least in the short run).

 

Yeah, take that, Big Red.

 

https://screen.yahoo.com/big-red-000000055.html

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with the Snapdragon 805 (APQ8084) is that it is just a processor; it has no integrated cellular baseband. So, it needs to be paired with a Gobi baseband, probably either the MDM9235 or MDM9635 . The rest of the world will go with the MDM9235 because it is 3GPP only, whereas the MDM9635 is 3GPP/3GPP2. Basically, with no integrated cellular baseband, a separate variant needs to be created for Sprint.

 

Now, compare that to the Snapdragon 801 (MSM8974AB/AC), which does have an integrated baseband. And for the integrated baseband chipsets, Qualcomm covers both bases with 3GPP/3GPP2. Since Sprint has already transitioned away from SVLTE to e/CSFB single radio architecture, no separate Sprint variant is necessary. The same handset variant can be sold to operators around the world. As long as the RF stack is already designed to support high frequency TD-LTE, then the CDMA2000 modes for Sprint need only be activated in firmware.

 

AJ

I thought the performance was the same whether the radio was integrated or not.

 

I looked at the FCC docs for the current Sony Z3 and it appears to not support Sprint bands so the firmware may not matter since it won't support LTE bands anyways.

 

Is the MDM9235 or MDM9635 worse performance wise than the MSM8974 standard or is it strictly just the firmware upgrade you were referring to?

 

Sent from my SM-G900P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the performance was the same whether the radio was integrated or not.

 

I looked at the FCC docs for the current Sony Z3 and it appears to not support Sprint bands so the firmware may not matter since it won't support LTE bands anyways.

 

Is the MDM9235 or MDM9635 worse performance wise than the MSM8974 standard or is it strictly just the firmware upgrade you were referring to?

 

No, you are a bit confused.

 

For various reasons, I prefer a Snapdragon chipset with an integrated baseband.  But performance is not one of those issues.  A Snapdragon chipset with an integrated LTE baseband is automatically 3GPP/3GPP2 compliant, so the OEMs do not have a real choice to go with a 3GPP only baseband.  That makes building and testing for the FCC a single hardware variant that also happens to be Sprint compatible far more sensible.  For example, look at the MSM8974 based Nexus 5 -- single inventory for AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint. 

 

However, when OEMs opt for a Snapdragon processor that lacks an integrated baseband, they typically utilize a 3GPP only Gobi baseband for the international variant.  Then, Sprint needs a separate variant with a 3GPP/3GPP2 baseband.  And the justification for building and testing a Sprint compatible handset starts to erode.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now add some Huawei, ZTE, lenovo, etc. and we're really cooking. Plus, offer them at really competitive prices.

I'm pretty sure that Sprint already has ZTE in their device lineup. Personally, I'm not impressed with them, but they might be ok for the budget minded, especially if subsidies ever totally go away.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that Sprint already has ZTE in their device lineup. Personally, I'm not impressed with them, but they might be ok for the budget minded, especially if subsidies ever totally go away.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

The Sprint Vital, Sprint Flash, and Sprint Force (IIRC there are two more) were whitelabeled ZTE.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Interesting, T-Mobile is demolishing a Sprint B25-only site that even Sprint wasn't using anymore. Sprint moved from that pole to a former Clearwire site on a nearby much taller mast but never demolished this original site. Up through 2021, there was still power to this site. Some time during COVID, the lights on the RRUs were no longer lit.  https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/ENR24-01067/Kirkland Streetview 
    • I noticed that on my Boost line. I ended up mapping some 2G on Cellmapper because of that lol. Looked like it would connect to T-Mobile 2G for a bit and then disconnect and show no signal. Thankfully it's back up and running.
    • Outside expert explanations of AT&T outage: https://www.lightreading.com/mobile-core/at-t-s-outage-twists-up-its-mwc-story
    • Service just restored in Columbus Ohio on AT&T network.  They seemed to do it in the following order: business (done early) then 5g hours later then ADSL and 4g about 4 hours after business. Then texting and wifi calling that was not setup before. At one point they were trying to route calls on T-Mobile 2g, but that failed.
    • Nationwide AT&T outage occurring right now affecting all of their brands, MVNOs, and even FirstNet. Although this kind of outage is rare, I bet Verizon and T-Mobile are both gonna try to use this to pull First Responders to their network or at least consider them for backup services. https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/22/24079910/att-network-outage-sos-mode
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...