Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

In Kansas City at least, I can tell you from experience that this isn't the case. Essentially every site is either full Sprint tri-band, or co-located/right next to a Clear B41 site with 2xCA enabled.

 

And the speeds reflect that. If memory serves, I believe this is the first time that Sprint has had an average download greater than 20Mbps. The ONLY reason for them not to tie/win according to the report would be the upload speed, which is ridiculous.

 

What else can Sprint do to further improve performance in this market?

 

Additional back haul?

Replace all the Clear site gear?

Densify with additional macro towers and small cells?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What else can Sprint do to further improve performance in this market?

 

Additional back haul?

Replace all the Clear site gear?

Densify with additional macro towers and small cells?

 

Mostly density. Outdoors pretty much everywhere I am on B41. Many places indoors I'm on B41 as well, but there are places where density would help with indoor B41 coverage. The Clear gear actually works pretty good. I get great coverage and speed from the clear sites in Johnson County (southwest suburbs of KC). In fact, the fastest speed I have seen so far (133Mbps) was on a Clear site in Lenexa. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What else can Sprint do to further improve performance in this market?

 

Additional back haul?

Replace all the Clear site gear?

Densify with additional macro towers and small cells?

 

 

Mostly density. Outdoors pretty much everywhere I am on B41. Many places indoors I'm on B41 as well, but there are places where density would help with indoor B41 coverage. The Clear gear actually works pretty good. I get great coverage and speed from the clear sites in Johnson County (southwest suburbs of KC). In fact, the fastest speed I have seen so far (133Mbps) was on a Clear site in Lenexa. 

 

Solution is basically higher density to increase RSRP levels on all UEs so the UEs can communicate to the eNB with less interference and whatnot that may detrimentally impact uplink speeds. The other options are to deploy wider FDD carriers and reconfigure the TDD configurations to a more uplink oriented one or utilize uplink carrier aggregation which is only possible on Band 41 for Sprints equipment.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mostly density. Outdoors pretty much everywhere I am on B41. Many places indoors I'm on B41 as well, but there are places where density would help with indoor B41 coverage. The Clear gear actually works pretty good. I get great coverage and speed from the clear sites in Johnson County (southwest suburbs of KC). In fact, the fastest speed I have seen so far (133Mbps) was on a Clear site in Lenexa.

 

Appreciate the info. Sprint does plan on eventually replacing that Clear gear right? How much improvement from doing that?

 

Also, weren't these performance numbers negatively impacted by the fact that WiMAX is still running, which limits Sprint's network overhaul/build progress?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solution is basically higher density to increase RSRP levels on all UEs so the UEs can communicate to the eNB with less interference and whatnot that may detrimentally impact uplink speeds. The other options are to deploy wider FDD carriers and reconfigure the TDD configurations to a more uplink oriented one or utilize uplink carrier aggregation which is only possible on Band 41 for Sprints equipment.

 

Appreciate the info. I recall a FierceWireless Article in which Sprint said it was looking into using Band 25 for uplink and Band 41 for downlink.

 

Link: http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-bring-carrier-aggregation-all-its-lte-bands-bid-boost-performance/2015-02-05

 

Also: What impact would 3x20 CA have? Anything substantial?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appreciate the info. Sprint does plan on eventually replacing that Clear gear right? How much improvement from doing that?

 

Also, weren't these performance numbers negatively impacted by the fact that WiMAX is still running, which limits Sprint's network overhaul/build progress?

 

Before the injunction, Sprint had already completed a lot of WiMax thinning in the KC market. All of the B41 sites had WiMax turned off already so they could fire up the second carrier and CA. The limiting factor now is they can't tear down any more WiMax only sites and rebuild them as Sprint sites. We had one WiMax site converted completely over to Sprint, but no more since the injunction.

 

All of the Clear equipment will be replaced, but I don't think they are in any hurry to replace the equipment that is currently running 2xCA. The only advantage to switching it out to Sprint would be the beamforming properties, and the additional carrier possibilities. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before the injunction, Sprint had already completed a lot of WiMax thinning in the KC market. All of the B41 sites had WiMax turned off already so they could fire up the second carrier and CA. The limiting factor now is they can't tear down any more WiMax only sites and rebuild them as Sprint sites. We had one WiMax site converted completely over to Sprint, but no more since the injunction.

 

All of the Clear equipment will be replaced, but I don't think they are in any hurry to replace the equipment that is currently running 2xCA. The only advantage to switching it out to Sprint would be the beamforming properties, and the additional carrier possibilities.

Advanced beam forming from 8t8r antennas*

 

TDD LTE already uses a basic beam forming technology and the Samsung clear b41 radios are capable of the same TM8 beam forming. It just doesn't perform as well as 8t8r antennas and radios which are substantially more advanced compared to the clear equipment.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Appreciate the info. I recall a FierceWireless Article in which Sprint said it was looking into using Band 25 for uplink and Band 41 for downlink.

 

Link: http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-bring-carrier-aggregation-all-its-lte-bands-bid-boost-performance/2015-02-05

 

Also: What impact would 3x20 CA have? Anything substantial?

The only real way I see using band 25 as uplink and band 41 downlink would be carrier aggregation. B25 as the primary component carrier and b41 as the secondary component carrier.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the speeds reflect that. If memory serves, I believe this is the first time that Sprint has had an average download greater than 20Mbps. The ONLY reason for them not to tie/win according to the report would be the upload speed, which is ridiculous. 

 

Looks like Corpus Christie also broke the 20Mbps mark, I'm not sure when that report came out, but I think it was before KC.

 

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/corpus-christi-tx/2015/2H

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before the injunction, Sprint had already completed a lot of WiMax thinning in the KC market. All of the B41 sites had WiMax turned off already so they could fire up the second carrier and CA. The limiting factor now is they can't tear down any more WiMax only sites and rebuild them as Sprint sites. We had one WiMax site converted completely over to Sprint, but no more since the injunction.

 

All of the Clear equipment will be replaced, but I don't think they are in any hurry to replace the equipment that is currently running 2xCA. The only advantage to switching it out to Sprint would be the beamforming properties, and the additional carrier possibilities.

 

So to make the move to 3xCA Sprint would have to swap out the Clear gear?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/milwaukee-wi/2015/2H

 

Sprint 2nd in Milwaukee.  T-Mobile suffers here because of lack of spectrum.  Hey but Binge away!

 

Sad that 24mbps median nets Sprint in last place (probably because of 5mbps upload) in Rockford:

 

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/rockford-il/2015/2H

 

Indianapolis.  Sprint's speed increased from 12.3mbps > 23.3 but only good for 3rd in speed.

 

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/indianapolis-in/2015/2H

 

2nd in MSP:

 

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/minneapolis-mn/2015/2H

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very bad. That really sucks. I would assume the same policy would take place at BestBuy, too.

Its temporary there was too much fraud and the authorized users had too much power. Once they modify it some it will be back.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its temporary there was too much fraud and the authorized users had too much power. Once they modify it some it will be back.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

 

What kind of fraud?

 

If your name is on an authorized user list, you can show ID, and you know the pin, I dont see what problem could exist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What kind of fraud?

 

If your name is on an authorized user list, you can show ID, and you know the pin, I dont see what problem could exist

Taking out new lines and giving them to their friends, not paying their portion of the bill, and the account gets shut off. That's my best guess.

 

 

Sent from my Gold iPhone 6s Plus 128GB using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy cow!

 

Since our testing in May, Sprint’s percentage of data tests recorded on LTE increased by nearly 20%.
Subsequently, Sprint’s median download speed increased from 10.8 Mbps to 28.2 Mbps, and Sprint’s median upload speed increased from 6.0 Mbps to 9.1 Mbps.
http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/chattanooga-tn/2015/2H
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint recorded the fastest downlink speed, yet it finished fourth in both Network Speed and Data.  That almost has to be uplink speed.  RootMetrics is unduly weighting the uplink.

 

AJ

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint recorded the fastest downlink speed, yet it finished fourth in both Network Speed and Data.  That almost has to be uplink speed.  RootMetrics is unduly weighting the uplink.

 

AJ

I guess Rootmetrics caters to those that upload infinite selfies at 40 megapixel resolution!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess Rootmetrics caters to those that upload infinite selfies at 40 megapixel resolution!

 

I believe I set my Dropbox camera uploads on all of my handsets to go over Wi-Fi only.  I do not want those high res images/videos wasting my battery and cellular data.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess Rootmetrics caters to those that upload infinite selfies at 40 megapixel resolution!

 

Appropriate downlink:uplink weighting should be approximately 3:1.  That would be 75 percent downlink, 25 percent uplink.  Absent mass gatherings, the uplink rarely gets congested.  Instead, the downlink gets swamped, while the uplink exceeds it.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to reddit, Sprint has stopped allowing authorized users to upgrade in store, account holder now required.

 

Thats bad news

This has been in place for about 3 months now, I encountered it trying to upgrade on my family plan. The account holder can make you a temporary holder online and then they'll upgrade you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tim Donahue announced as new President, Kansas and Missouri

 

https://twitter.com/marceloclaure/status/675019436701655040

 

Nice intro video.

 

More about Tim: http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2015/12/10/sprint-regional-president-tim-donahue.html

 

Bring it on home Tim!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appropriate downlink:uplink weighting should be approximately 3:1.  That would be 75 percent downlink, 25 percent uplink.  Absent mass gatherings, the uplink rarely gets congested.  Instead, the downlink gets swamped, while the uplink exceeds it.

 

AJ

 

Just wait until magenta users go full binge on!  Their performance will be totally lopsided.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wait until magenta users go full binge on! Their performance will be totally lopsided.

Laugh it up now. If Sprint is testing music with no data then their own version of binge on could be next.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...