Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

That would never happen.

You may be correct that it will never happen, but there is a possibility or several strange things happening. This sure is a strange thing that has never happened but it may be a way to combine the spectrum and have a kick axx network. Loads of capacity with less capex and miscellaneous expense. Shake hands and combine efforts all around to compete against the big 2. Several other strange things that could happen might be even worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously? You are the most unrealistic consumer ever. How many times have you switched?

.

Actually I announced here around four weeks ago that I was considering leaving T-Mobile, but I haven't done so yet, as some issues have since happened. Even today is my first day back here posting after being away for a few days. There is so much I have to arrange, I don't blame anyone for the confusion/misunderstanding of my posts lately. The reason for me leaving T-Mobile though is the same as when I announced it some weeks ago, being that I can't manage the Digits service with my Lumia.

 

Anyways, I may actually end up going with a single-line Sprint plan, as I found out today that AT&T isn't offering their Unlimited Plan with the Freelancers Union discount, or any corporate discount, other than military/veteran discounts. So, I've got some things to consider. Both of Sprint's offers are very good right now, and is a difficult decision between them and Verizon, I was just hoping to make the billing easier for my mother by going with AT&T on all our services.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You wouldn't be saying this if you resided in CT. Essentially impossible

Wouldn't be saying what? I was on B41 a good bit in Newtown and Monroe(not the only places I had B41 in CT by a long shot). I even streamed a show at the Big Y in Monroe, CT while I was waiting on someone. I just wish there was a spreadsheet and a map. The only large area I see sprint struggling is in a 25 mile by 25 mile square in the northeast of the state. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't be saying what? I was on B41 a good bit in Newtown and Monroe(not the only places I had B41 in CT by a long shot). I even streamed a show at the Big Y in Monroe, CT while I was waiting on someone. I just wish there was a spreadsheet and a map. The only large area I see sprint struggling is in a 25 mile by 25 mile square in the northeast of the state.

Hartford, Bridgeport, New haven, Meriden, Hamden, Clinton, new Britain, Manchester. The areas in and around the casinos. A spot here and there may be great. Too often cell sites too far apart, maps not accurately reflecting coverage.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hartford, Bridgeport, New haven, Meriden, Hamden, Clinton, new Britain, Manchester. The areas in and around the casinos. A spot here and there may be great. Too often cell sites too far apart, maps not accurately reflecting coverage.

All of this is correct. Eastern CT coverage is not good. If you drive down RT 15, you'll notice LTE going in and out.

 

84 from Mass to 91 still doesn't have complete LTE coverage.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by WiseGuy321
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have signal detector logs and SCP that say B41 is wide spread on the western part of the state. 70% of Newtown and Monroe area is covered. 90% of the interstate between Waterbury and Tunxis Community College is covered with B41 not "small spots". 100% LTE coverage the last time I went into West CT since I started a massive signal detector logs collection. Which I was in the Monroe area and up to past Tunxis Community College. A lot of B41 sites around Bridgeport. West Haven had the first B41 3rd carrier in ALU markets. Windsor Locks has a decent network the last couple years I have worked up there 4 or 5 weeks a year. 

 

The maps are sponsor level different color pins for different tech.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly!    And it's not impeded with IBEZ issues at all the borders with the spectrum they do have. 

 

All of the carriers on both sides on the border have interference issues and inadvertent international roaming. Sprint's IBEZ issues are mostly caused because of the stupid schedule the transition administrator came up with in which IBEZ areas came dead last in the schedule. No reason why they could not have been done in parallel. The whole rebanding was a total cluster you know what and the FCC shares a lion's share of the blame. Don't get me started!

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know bigsnake... it gets me upset too.... it's a frustrating thing.    Just hope it's finally solved now as it appears for the most part to be.   Sprint appears to be slowly adding 800 around here now that the Great Lakes region is clear.  That's is good news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint and Samsung Test Massive MIMO Technology in South Korea

http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-and-samsung-test-massive-mimo-technology-in-south-korea.htm

 

"During field testing in Suwon, Massive MIMO Samsung radios, equipped with vertical and horizontal beam-forming technology, reached peak speeds of 330 Mbps per channel using a 20 MHz channel of 2.5 GHz spectrum. Capacity per channel increased about four times, cell edge performance increased three times, and overall coverage area improved as compared to current radios."

 

And....

 

"In cities across the U.S., Sprint plans to deploy Massive MIMO radios with 128 antenna elements (64T64R) using its 2.5 GHz spectrum to increase capacity up to eight times. In March, Sprint was the first U.S. carrier to debut Gigabit Class LTE on a live commercial network in New Orleans. There Sprint used three-channel carrier aggregation and 60 MHz of 2.5 GHz spectrum, in combination with 4X4 MIMO and 256-QAM higher order modulation, to achieve Category 16 LTE download data speeds on a TDD network. With Massive MIMO radios using 64T64R, Sprint has the ability to push capacity beyond 1 Gbps to reach 3-6 Gbps per sector."

 

Sounds great.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint and Samsung Test Massive MIMO Technology in South Korea

http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-and-samsung-test-massive-mimo-technology-in-south-korea.htm

 

"During field testing in Suwon, Massive MIMO Samsung radios, equipped with vertical and horizontal beam-forming technology, reached peak speeds of 330 Mbps per channel using a 20 MHz channel of 2.5 GHz spectrum. Capacity per channel increased about four times, cell edge performance increased three times, and overall coverage area improved as compared to current radios."

 

And....

 

"In cities across the U.S., Sprint plans to deploy Massive MIMO radios with 128 antenna elements (64T64R) using its 2.5 GHz spectrum to increase capacity up to eight times. In March, Sprint was the first U.S. carrier to debut Gigabit Class LTE on a live commercial network in New Orleans. There Sprint used three-channel carrier aggregation and 60 MHz of 2.5 GHz spectrum, in combination with 4X4 MIMO and 256-QAM higher order modulation, to achieve Category 16 LTE download data speeds on a TDD network. With Massive MIMO radios using 64T64R, Sprint has the ability to push capacity beyond 1 Gbps to reach 3-6 Gbps per sector."

 

Sounds great.

That is good and everything, but if they do another deployment like the  8T8R then it will be half baked.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is good and everything, but if they do another deployment like the 8T8R then it will be half baked.

Expect to see this only in markets where Sprint as a network shines.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expect to see this only in markets where Sprint as a network shines.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That won't mean anything because there is opportunities to grab customers everywhere across the 50 states. They are thinking with a losing mentality instead of becoming ruthless businessmen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That won't mean anything because there is opportunities to grab customers everywhere across the 50 states. They are thinking with a losing mentality instead of becoming ruthless businessmen.

I agree. As it has always shown, they show favor to a handful of markets that they are really good in. Everywhere else they just blend in with other three if even that. It's kinda sad given the fact that they have a extremely good hand with spectrum in almost every state.

 

There's no doubt in my mind that Sprint can surpass everyone but as time goes on, this 2.5 advantage they scream about starts to fade. How it looks right now, when 5G hits Sprint will just be competitive but not the number 1 carrier when it comes to 5G. The network will be where their 4G should have been.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. As it has always shown, they show favor to a handful of markets that they are really good in. Everywhere else they just blend in with other three if even that. It's kinda sad given the fact that they have a extremely good hand with spectrum in almost every state.

 

There's no doubt in my mind that Sprint can surpass everyone but as time goes on, this 2.5 advantage they scream about starts to fade. How it looks right now, when 5G hits Sprint will just be competitive but not the number 1 carrier when it comes to 5G. The network will be where their 4G should have been.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We are basically 5 months away from 2018 and Sprint hasn't catched up to the competition. By the middle of 2019 the other three will be moving into 5G deployments. In fact by July of 2019 you will hear Verizon, AT&T and maybe T Mobile 5G radios being installed in their macros.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are basically 5 months away from 2018 and Sprint hasn't catched up to the competition. By the middle of 2019 the other three will be moving into 5G deployments. In fact by July of 2019 you will hear Verizon, AT&T and maybe T Mobile 5G radios being installed in their macros.

It's unclear how much is really happening network-wise. When I look at the excellent maps here and see changes, that's encouraging, but it's a bit painful honestly to see how many areas still have 3G towers or no 800 MHz/2.5 GHz deployed. This isn't a short term fix. A tremendous amount of work remains to be done.

 

Magic Boxes aren't shipping until late summer per the status page. (https://www.sprint.com/content/Sprint/sprint_com/us/en/shop/services/magic-box/status.html)

 

The AIRAVE 3 has yet to be officially announced, and I'm sure it will help substantially once deployed.

 

Combine that with Marcelo's CapEx remarks that seem at odds with what's actually happening.

 

It almost seems like this MIMO press release was designed to counter the PC Mag Results, even if Günther's trip there was planned well ahead of time.

 

It just feels a bit stalled out. I can't describe it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's unclear how much is really happening network-wise. When I look at the excellent maps here and see changes, that's encouraging, but it's a bit painful honestly to see how many areas still have 3G towers or no 800 MHz/2.5 GHz deployed. This isn't a short term fix. A tremendous amount of work remains to be done.

 

Magic Boxes aren't shipping until late summer per the status page. (https://www.sprint.com/content/Sprint/sprint_com/us/en/shop/services/magic-box/status.html)

 

The AIRAVE 3 has yet to be officially announced, and I'm sure it will help substantially once deployed.

 

Combine that with Marcelo's CapEx remarks that seem at odds with what's actually happening.

 

It almost seems like this MIMO press release was designed to counter the PC Mag Results, even if Günther's trip there was planned well ahead of time.

 

It just feels a bit stalled out. I can't describe it.

I agree. I have yet to see any movement on small cell deployment and stoped getting b41 coverage in places I use to get it. Further, I have seen no 3xca anywhere in my area. It is extremely frustrating to see pieces like this given the rhetoric that has come out of marcelo's mouth.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I have yet to see any movement on small cell deployment and stoped getting b41 coverage in places I use to get it. Further, I have seen no 3xca anywhere in my area. It is extremely frustrating to see pieces like this given the rhetoric that has come out of marcelo's mouth.

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Networks are never finished. They continually improve with new technology, but this PC Mag report shows Sprint's performance disparity, and it's not by a little bit. They used Galaxy S8's, and that's what the performance was. Hopefully the next report is better.

 

We'll see what Marcelo says at the next Earnings report call, but it's got to get better than this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Networks are never finished. They continually improve with new technology, but this PC Mag report shows Sprint's performance disparity, and it's not by a little bit. They used Galaxy S8's, and that's what the performance was. Hopefully the next report is better.

 

We'll see what Marcelo says at the next Earnings report call, but it's got to get better than this.

And on this note mini macros have popped up in providence ri over the last couple weeks.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And on this note mini macros have popped up in providence ri over the last couple weeks.

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

That's good news. We could definitely use some of those here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Headline, "At S4GRU, Naysayers say nay."

 

Get constructive.  Stop the pessimism.  I don't put in the countless hours to host whining.  *Yawn*

 

Negativity just spawns more negativity.

 

Robert

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely do not want to make excuses for Sprint, but I do find it interesting that the GS7 averages better speeds than the GS8 in their own testing, and I believe it's due to radio tuning on the GS8.

 

Don't get me wrong it's a great device, but for some odd reason, before I swapped the band priority(comes with B41 as third! Why Sprint?!) it loved to live on Band 26. After making those changes I and a few other users noticed alot more consistently sticking to B41, but still, I find it swapped to other bands too soon.

 

Would have it made a difference? Maybe maybe not, but it sure as hell has for some.

It has to be, I just forced B41 to be the #1 choice, B25 #2 and B26 #3 and it's made a real difference speed/coverage wise. I don't know why the default setup on the S8 is I believe B26, B25 then B41 which makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frustration leads to nay saying. Quit spending Money and Time on useless things and expand the network to all areas as previously promised many times and never delivered!!!

 

Last word I received from Sprint is that there are no plans currently to upgrade the towers I use at home and work. If it isn't better with either a Magic Box or by the time T-Mobile finishes their upgrades here I will have to consider changing services after over 15 years.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naysayers gonna nay.  Nay, nay, Wilbur.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

The reason for me leaving T-Mobile though is the same as when I announced it some weeks ago, being that I can't manage the Digits service with my Lumia.

...

 

So you'll leave T-Mobile for not supporting one of their services on your device for a network that doesn't offer the service at all? I mean, it's your money, but it sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...