Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Do we know the status of the waiver for AZ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Good question. Not sure. Perhaps it's still under consideration at the FCC? How can we find out the status?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a64a0bf643d714860656e19771e0eb01.jpg

 

The top of this where I captured is something that the others can't do. Also looks like HPUE is something Sprint came up and was approved by the 3GPP group.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess will deploy massive MIMO at some point or another. 64Tx64R. They showed off  prototype Nokia antenna in NYC.

 

http://www.lightreading.com/mobile/spectrum/sprint-lights-fire-under-high-band-4g-builds-for-5g/d/d-id/728971?

 

Great read!

 

And the article also quoted this re 3CA updates for existing devices:

 

Device VP Sullivan told me that the upgrades will come for Apple, Samsung and a host of other vendors early next year. This will be "well ahead" of the Mobile World Congress show in late February next year, he said.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you take a close look at the images released during the presentation yesterday, you'll see this on the screen:

  • 1.9 GHz Baseline
  • Drop point for an LTE phone on 2.5 GHz with no HPUE is 77% of that baseline outdoors.
  • Drop point for an LTE phone on 2.5 GHz with HPUE is 99% of that baseline outdoors.

Because HPUE can improve 2.5 GHz coverage up to 30 percent, it's able to cover 99 percent of the area covered by Sprint's 1.9 GHz spectrum outdoors and approximately 90 percent of Sprint's 1.9 GHz spectrum coverage indoors. 

 

Once Sprint is able to make real progress on its densification program (including small cell deployments) and ramps up carrier aggregation to 3 Carriers and beyond (and the device base has enough HPUE device uptake), I don't think any other carrier will be able to keep up.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is already moving to 64T64R when they haven't even dense their network with 8T8R. This is the fundamental problem at Overland Park. They deploy a little bit of a tech then move to the next one.

 

Dan Hesse and to a certain extent Saw said that the 8T8R was future proof.

 

I never bought into the silver bullet of dense a network on efficiency and a lower budget. Nokia is a public company with responsibility to shareholders and they will always get wireless networks to spend billions into the new tech. No to mention Mobilitie and Crown Castle have the same business structure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is already moving to 64T64R when they haven't even dense their network with 8T8R. This is the fundamental problem at Overland Park. They deploy a little bit of a tech then move to the next one.

 

Dan Hesse and to a certain extent Saw said that the 8T8R was future proof.

 

I never bought into the silver bullet of dense a network on efficiency and a lower budget. Nokia is a public company with responsibility to shareholders and they will always get wireless networks to spend billions into the new tech. No to mention Mobilitie and Crown Castle have the same business structure.

 

Nothing is future proof.

 

Networks are never finished.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you take a close look at the images released during the presentation yesterday, you'll see this on the screen:

  • 1.9 GHz Baseline
  • Drop point for an LTE phone on 2.5 GHz with no HPUE is 77% of that baseline outdoors.
  • Drop point for an LTE phone on 2.5 GHz with HPUE is 99% of that baseline outdoors.
Because HPUE can improve 2.5 GHz coverage up to 30 percent, it's able to cover 99 percent of the area covered by Sprint's 1.9 GHz spectrum outdoors and approximately 90 percent of Sprint's 1.9 GHz spectrum coverage indoors.

 

Once Sprint is able to make real progress on its densification program (including small cell deployments) and ramps up carrier aggregation to 3 Carriers and beyond (and the device base has enough HPUE device uptake), I don't think any other carrier will be able to keep up.

Which is why they keep saying they plan to have best network. I just hope they execute the small cell rollout. I feel it's the most important factor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is already moving to 64T64R when they haven't even dense their network with 8T8R. This is the fundamental problem at Overland Park. They deploy a little bit of a tech then move to the next one.

 

Dan Hesse and to a certain extent Saw said that the 8T8R was future proof.

 

I never bought into the silver bullet of dense a network on efficiency and a lower budget. Nokia is a public company with responsibility to shareholders and they will always get wireless networks to spend billions into the new tech. No to mention Mobilitie and Crown Castle have the same business structure.

Massive mimo with 3D beam forming and other technologies is the next step for td LTE networks.

 

China Mobile and Softbank both have already deployed it for commercial usage and implemented other feature rich software suites sprint is just developing.

 

Technology is always advancing and sprint can't be "number one" without keeping up with the times or do you want sprint to not invest in new technologies and let the network be technologically outdated and even more inferior.

 

-- side note - - massive mimo is well suited to major urban areas where extreme capacity and coverage reliability is needed. It's not a replacement for 8t8r but a complement as small cells are to macro cells.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of all the technologies just mentioned that sprint planned to implement next year, one of them for sure to happen is hpue because it does not cost anything.  There are stipulations to all other promises mainly cash.  But this hpue alone i think will really make a big difference for sprint and and cost next to nothing to implement.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Marcelo will be doing some device/plan sales at a retail store on this upcoming Saturday:

 

Claure will trade C-suite for retail floor to sell plans at Plaza store

 

He'll also be visiting some call centers according to the article.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are now starting to see Sprints vision. Now it's about executing it. Now I see why they were so hush hush about things

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of all the technologies just mentioned that sprint planned to implement next year, one of them for sure to happen is hpue because it does not cost anything.  There are stipulations to all other promises mainly cash.  But this hpue alone i think will really make a big difference for sprint and and cost next to nothing to implement.  

It does require newer handsets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Marcelo will be doing some device/plan sales at a retail store on this upcoming Saturday:

 

Claure will trade C-suite for retail floor to sell plans at Plaza store

 

He'll also be visiting some call centers according to the article.

I think we are now starting to see Sprints vision. Now it's about executing it. Now I see why they were so hush hush about things

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, why telegraph something that you are developing and can give you a edge over others .

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same reason why customers need to purchase new devices to access B12 and B66 <_<

 

No one is breaking up with anyone, stop trolling.

Hey I sent you a Message. I'm sorry Man. Hope we can get along. I would like that.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey I sent you a Message. I'm sorry Man. Hope we can get along. I would like that.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

No worries man, I'm sorry for accusing you of trolling. Was spending too much time reading Reddit.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would think a tech writer would understand the technology before writing something that is completely wrong. I bolded the incorrect info. 

 

 

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sprints-secret-booster-will-make-your-high-end-handset-run-faster_id88990

 

 

From the article:

 

"Unlike most carriers, Sprint uses three different frequencies including the 2.5GHz airwaves that are higher frequency. While such airwaves offer higher capacity and speed, they also have the opposite features of low frequency spectrum such as limited distance and an inability to penetrate buildings. But the 3 x carrier aggregation allows all three bands to be used giving Sprint customers the best of each of the three frequencies. The HTC Bolt, a Sprint exclusive, is the first phone offered by the carrier to support this technology out of the box"

 

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...