Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I don't fear that day, in fact, I'm looking forward to it. It's inevitable for both companies.

 

He can't lie to them forever...

 

I believe I've seen fanboys asking if T-Mobile will go to Canada or Mexico to spread their "movement". They really don't live in reality, nor do they come up for air.

 

The T-Army is going to be in for a reality check, no matter how much nor how long they continue to tap-dance, attack and cry.

 

T-Mobile isn't taking over the world (or the US), sorry.

One thing is for certain, they are far from taking over the Midwest, as they have so little amount of spectrum here.

 

Another issue is that I'm so sick of them claiming T-Mobile did well, or well enough in the AWS3 auction, which they did not do either. They did poorly, at best, which shows they either don't care or have very little money, perhaps both. If it were the money, they should have forgone this area specific 700mhz spectrum purchase, and either saved it for the AWS3 auction or the 600mhz auction, which the latter I believe they'll do poorly in at best also,

 

However, the magenta minions will still be bragging on about how great their beloved company is while T-Mobile gets desperate for a merger. DT must have its good reasons for wanting to dump T-Mobile, which I certainly understand. I'm already excited to be dumping them for the excellent Sprint plan arrangement I'll be getting tomorrow.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the FCC wants to side with ATT/Verizon's wishes on how much is set aside for smaller players, fine.  But in that case they need to reconsider the decision to prohibit joint bidding.   If Uncle Charlie is allowed to bid and he has the $$$, he's going to jam as many bidders into the mix as he can with the goal of eliminating one of the two small players from success for his nefarious network dreams.  Until we hear about him striking a deal with someone, you can rest assure his greed and penny pinching negotiation tactics are why he hasn't found that partner thus far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the FCC wants to side with ATT/Verizon's wishes on how much is set aside for smaller players, fine. But in that case they need to reconsider the decision to prohibit joint bidding.

I thought softb was gonna fund this?[emoji12]

I got an earful on this topic.

 

The argument is: sprint and TMO are part of companies with caps of $70B each.

They can afford to bid.

Plus there's still gonna be 30mhz (at most) so one of TMO, sprint will have to compete for 10mhz with att/vzw.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say screw 600Mhz. I think with the advent of C RAN and the reduced cost of site deployment, plus small cell they should concentrate their efforts on densifying 2500. Its future proof, plus less reliance on newer equipment.

 

Why rely on another small 10Mhz slice worth of spectrum when it will come at a huge cost! Which would affect current B41 deployment in a negative way.

 

When Verizon and Att first deployed LTE on a 10x10 slice, demand was exponentially lower. Today, that will barely get you by.

 

I say leave that bone to the dogs, and lets eat some steak....

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say screw 600Mhz. I think with the advent of C RAN and the reduced cost of site deployment, plus small cell they should concentrate their efforts on densifying 2500. Its future proof, plus less reliance on newer equipment.

 

Why rely on another small 10Mhz slice worth of spectrum when it will come at a huge cost! Which would affect current B41 deployment in a negative way.

 

When Verizon and Att first deployed LTE on a 10x10 slice, demand was exponentially lower. Today, that will barely get you by.

 

I say leave that bone to the dogs, and lets eat some steak....

Small cells is irrelevant for 600mhz. Sprints small cells won't even contain b26, only b25/41.

 

If sprint doesn't get more lowband, then it'll be limited in 'rural-ish' expansion.

 

Also robert stated 5x5 b26 is not enough for volte longterm. That is enough reason for at least 5x5 600

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small cells is irrelevant for 600mhz. Sprints small cells won't even contain b26, only b25/41.

 

If sprint doesn't get more lowband, then it'll be limited in 'rural-ish' expansion.

 

Also robert stated 5x5 b26 is not enough for volte longterm. That is enough reason for at least 5x5 600

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sprint is already balancing 3 separate bands, its complicated to say the least.  Add one more, and its another layer of unneeded complication.

 

Keep densifying, get that higher X MIMO activated, and forget 600Mhz!  

 

It would take Sprint another 3 years at best to get some sort of traction using 600Mhz.

 

Also, why do you say 600Mhz is irrelevant to small cell? CAPEX is CAPEX no matter how you direct it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is already balancing 3 separate bands, its complicated to say the least. Add one more, and its another layer of unneeded complication.

 

Keep densifying, get that higher X MIMO activated, and forget 600Mhz!

 

It would take Sprint another 3 years at best to get some sort of traction using 600Mhz.

You keep on equating low band with X MIMO and other mid/high band technologies.

 

Low band is for in building and rural coverage.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You keep on equating low band with X MIMO and other mid/high band technologies.

 

Low band is for in building and rural coverage.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So your saying densification will not affect in building coverage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your saying densification will not affect in building coverage?

They can't afford to surround every big building with dozens of small cells.

 

But I don't have enough confidence in my arm-chair CEO abilities to address this question.

 

AJ, Robert?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can't afford to surround every big building with dozens of small cells.

 

But I don't have enough confidence in my arm-chair CEO abilities to address this question.

 

AJ, Robert?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Nothing can achieve full in building coverage. That's what WiFi is for.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint ultimately wants to complete in rural areas, it will need more than the 5x5 below 1 GHz it effectively has now.  In most areas, Verizon and AT&T have 20x20 spread across 700 and 850 MHz, some of which is dedicated to 3G at present but will ultimately be used for LTE in the future, and Sprint's 5x5 won't touch that by a long shot. 

 

Small cells don't work in areas where there's no infrastructure to back them up.

 

- Trip

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even without the 600Mhz spectrum, this new network plan is sounding like it'll be a very nice upgrade for Sprint customers. If Sprint decides to participate in the auction, adding 600Mhz LTE on top of this would be an even better situation.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint ultimately wants to complete in rural areas, it will need more than the 5x5 below 1 GHz it effectively has now.  In most areas, Verizon and AT&T have 20x20 spread across 700 and 850 MHz, some of which is dedicated to 3G at present but will ultimately be used for LTE in the future, and Sprint's 5x5 won't touch that by a long shot. 

 

Small cells don't work in areas where there's no infrastructure to back them up.

 

- Trip

 

if anything can be learned from T-Mobile, it's that wireless carriers shouldn't and don't have to prioritize rural customers. it's part of the 'rural tax', you pay more for *everything* but real estate because you chose to live in the middle of nowhere.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AThe moment a T-Mobile customer steps out of town, they have no service.  While some people are willing to accept that, I'm sure many more do not, and even if Sprint doesn't use their 600 MHz purchase themselves, their RRPP partners will definitely use it and make Sprint service that much more attractive both to their own customers and those of the RRPP members.

 

Not going to comment on the "just move to the city!" fallacy that many people like to repeat.

 

- Trip

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AThe moment a T-Mobile customer steps out of town, they have no service. While some people are willing to accept that, I'm sure many more do not, and even if Sprint doesn't use their 600 MHz purchase themselves, their RRPP partners will definitely use it and make Sprint service that much more attractive both to their own customers and those of the RRPP members.

 

Not going to comment on the "just move to the city!" fallacy that many people like to repeat.

 

- Trip

Agreed.

 

As much of a wireless enthusiast that I am, I would never move to a new location due to cell coverage from my current provider. I'd switch cell providers first.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AThe moment a T-Mobile customer steps out of town, they have no service. While some people are willing to accept that, I'm sure many more do not, and even if Sprint doesn't use their 600 MHz purchase themselves, their RRPP partners will definitely use it and make Sprint service that much more attractive both to their own customers and those of the RRPP members.

 

Not going to comment on the "just move to the city!" fallacy that many people like to repeat.

 

- Trip

 

Yet TMO is adding postpaid phone subs while sprint is not.

Imagine how well they'll do when they finish their GMO lte upgrades.

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet TMO is adding postpaid phone subs while sprint is not.

Imagine how well they'll do when they finish their GMO lte upgrades.

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Can you just put the following blurb in your signature?

 

"TMO is adding postpaid phone subscribers.  Sprint is not.  Na Na Na Boo Boo."   

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you just put the following blurb in your signature?

 

"TMO is adding postpaid phone subscribers. Sprint is not. Na Na Na Boo Boo."

I addressed his comment about TMO not having rural coverage and it's impact.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I addressed his comment about TMO not having rural coverage and it's impact.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I'm just saying it would save you some significant time.  Instead of typing it out each time, you type it out once into your signature, then simply post "see signature."   :lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with T-Mobile. I think they are doing a great job but they are just popular and "in" right now until the next "in" thing comes around. Everything has a season.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with T-Mobile. I think they are doing a great job but they are just popular and "in" right now until the next "in" thing comes around. Everything has a season.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They have effective advertising.

Minimize their weaknesses and amplify their strengths. Legere def has created a cult for the ignorant just look at tmonews comments: it's obvious the ghetto is firmly behind Legere

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have effective advertising.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right which makes them popular and cool to be with. T-Mobile is in their season right now. Verizon, AT&T and Sprint all had theirs at one point but ended once something better came along. The same can be said for T-Mobile. They will stay this way until the next cool thing appears.

 

I just read the rest of your post you updated. LMAO!!!

 

T-Mobile has a lot of die hard cult like people but I wonder how many would stay if one day (even though it will never happen) AT&T or Verizon felt giving and gave new customers a 60 day window to sign up with them get comparable data plans as T-Mobile that will slow you down to 1-2mbps after you hit your limit?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have effective advertising.

Minimize their weaknesses and amplify their strengths. Legere def has created a cult for the ignorant just look at tmonews comments: it's obvious the ghetto is firmly behind Legere

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I should really stop reading TmoNews. People there are so oblivious to almost everything related to wireless networks.

 

That, and at work Adblock is not allowed. :(

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...