Jump to content

Sprint: 800 MHz rebanding project nearing completion


Rawvega

Recommended Posts

 

Sprint (NYSE: S) told the FCC that its rebanding efforts in the 800 MHz band are nearing completion, according to a filing the carrier made with the commission. The declaration comes nearly a decade after the FCC ordered the rebanding of the 800 MHz band to alleviate interference to public-safety licensees in 800 MHz band caused by commercial cellular licensees.

 

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-800-mhz-rebanding-project-nearing-completion/2014-07-14

 

sprint-800-reband.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice find. I am shocked though that detroit is complete with rebanding given its next to canadian border. Hopefully California can be rebanded soon since it seems no part of California is 100% rebanded.

 

I am curious why seattle hasnt been rebanded already given how detroit was able to get it done.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in terms of non-border areas, NorCal, Nevada, Florida, Oklahoma, Arkansas, PR/USVI and three regions in Texas each only have licensee left. Does anyone know who all of these holdouts are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in terms of non-border areas, NorCal, Nevada, Florida, Oklahoma, Arkansas, PR/USVI and three regions in Texas each only have licensee left. Does anyone know who all of these holdouts are?

 

Yes, Robert and I probably do know the holdouts.  But we decided long ago not to write about them at S4GRU.  They are spectrum speculators.  Any publicity they get only increases their buyout value.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Robert and I probably do know the holdouts.  But we decided long ago not to write about them at S4GRU.  They are spectrum speculators.  Any publicity they get only increases their buyout value.

 

AJ

 

Is this something that can be disclosed in the sponsor or premier sponsor section since that wouldn't be viewable by the general public? I do now recall the identity of the spectrum squatter in Puerto Rico as there was a discussion about them in 800 MHz spectrum map thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this something that can be disclosed in the sponsor or premier sponsor section since that wouldn't be viewable by the general public? I do now recall the identity of the spectrum squatter in Puerto Rico as there was a discussion about them in 800 MHz spectrum map thread.

 

I think this recent filing in the FCC's 800 MHz reconfiguration docket will answer your question.  Seriously.

 

http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017840577

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this is all great news, I just wish it would help those of us in Mid/West Michigan figure out why there is no SMR Voice or LTE being rolled out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, but! What about Seattle!

 

That's not fair that they're dragging their feet with WA State!

 

Make a deal with the FCC, and give Canadians some headway with their future slices of low-band spectrum rebranding plans. Sell 40Mhz of EBS/2.5Ghz in order to get it done! Do something!!!

Edited by EmeraldReporter
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the best posts I've ever read on here.  Classic.

 

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."

 

- Winston Churchill (or, at least, oft attributed)

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this is all great news, I just wish it would help those of us in Mid/West Michigan figure out why there is no SMR Voice or LTE being rolled out.

The Canadian IBEZ will be sorted out before the end of the year. The Mexican IBEZ on the other hand...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Canadian IBEZ will be sorted out before the end of the year. The Mexican IBEZ on the other hand...

West Michigan is out of the 140mile exclusion zone, Mid michigan is out of the 100 mile, but in the 40 mile buffer zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mexican IBEZ on the other hand...

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://theconversation.com/carlos-slims-empire-broken-up-but-oligarchs-still-control-mexico-29072

 

Maybe the Carlos Slim empire getting broken up will help. Maybe not.

NII will know which Mexican officials to bribe, I mean lobby, to get it done :)

Edited by bigsnake49
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want a source for that Canadian IBEZ resolution please.

 

Please, please, please!

 

http://www.800ta.org/content/reporting/QPR_03.31.14.pdf

 

Look at Chart 1. The actual physical returning is nearing completion. All that is left is the verification. and that chart was of 3/31/2014.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rebanding is a separate issue than the IBEZ.  Rebanding can complete along the Mexico and Canada borders and the IBEZ will still persist.  This rebanding is affecting American providers in the SMR band, not international providers in the same spectrum.

 

Until Mexican and Canadian providers stop using narrowband transmissions within Sprint's 800 SMR spectrum holdings on the other side of the border, there will be no resolution to the IBEZ problem.  Until Mexico and Canada rebands themselves, the problem will will not go away.  AFAIK, there is no rebanding occurring north or south of the border.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Probably not worth the fiddling given that that's a few percent of the band. Also, if they really wanted to push my assumption is there are still guard bands in play for the n41 carriers so they could fit two "100 MHz" carriers into 194 MHz anyway. Looks like minimum guard band is less than 1 MHz and a 100 MHz channel is only 273 30 KHz resource blocks, which is a bit over 80 MHz total, so if they really wanted to pull another 5% or so capacity out they could.
    • Saw that for a while. Now back to n25 + n71 + n41-100Mhz + n41-90Mhz.
    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...