Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy S5 User Thread


LuisBOSS302

Recommended Posts

The S4 had issues with enforcing a dock mode due to voltage requirements of the USB and the new "home" modes of Android 4.2+. There are a bazillion threads on it over at XDA. I'm certain that enforcing a dock mode with a car dock (ie, click phone in and a new screen pops up like it did with the S3) is a thing of the past. And wouldn't be surprised if the S5 lacked it too. It would be best to use Trigger or something to recognize your car Bluetooth and enforce dock mode. Or some other sort of trigger.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The S4 had issues with enforcing a dock mode due to voltage requirements of the USB and the new "home" modes of Android 4.2+. There are a bazillion threads on it over at XDA. I'm certain that enforcing a dock mode with a car dock (ie, click phone in and a new screen pops up like it did with the S3) is a thing of the past. And wouldn't be surprised if the S5 lacked it too. It would be best to use Trigger or something to recognize your car Bluetooth and enforce dock mode. Or some other sort of trigger.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

I'm not really asking anything about triggering it.....I'm more interested in verifying that it exists in the Sprint S5 and if so, the functionality of the driving mode itself.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the S5 and the screen is gorgeous. The only thing is the rf performance is slightly worst than my S4T by 4-6dBm on average. Maybe a future update will fix it. The default setting is Global by the way.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not really asking anything about triggering it.....I'm more interested in verifying that it exists in the Sprint S5 and if so, the functionality of the driving mode itself.

Gotcha, sorry. Misunderstood the question.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the S5 for my brother today and played with it.  Very impressed.  LTE signal isn't quite as strong as N5, but it's a hair stronger than the G2 (only tested Band 25.)

 

My initial gripe was that my universal USB car charger doesn't fit it.  Samsung has apparently changed the way the USB port is shaped and limited the amount of chargers it supports. 

 

Aside from that, the size, shape, and software is nifty.  I dislike Knox as well, but I knew that prior to picking up the device.  

 

P.S. Ain't got nothin' on my G2.  :ninja:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one laugh but I'm interested in a comparison of RF performance between the S3 and the S5. Obviously only on the bands in common.

 

As far as everything else it looks like the S5 is a night and day improvement to the S3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one laugh but I'm interested in a comparison of RF performance between the S3 and the S5. Obviously only on the bands in common.

 

As far as everything else it looks like the S5 is a night and day improvement to the S3.

The galaxy s5 is supposedly in the range between the LG g2 and Nexus 5 so about 10-15 dBm better than the gs3 at the same spot

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the S5 for my brother today and played with it. Very impressed. LTE signal isn't quite as strong as N5, but it's a hair stronger than the G2 (only tested Band 25.)

 

My initial gripe was that my universal USB car charger doesn't fit it. Samsung has apparently changed the way the USB port is shaped and limited the amount of chargers it supports.

 

Aside from that, the size, shape, and software is nifty. I dislike Knox as well, but I knew that prior to picking up the device.

 

P.S. Ain't got nothin' on my G2. :ninja:

Usb 3.0 will still accept a regular micro usb charger. It will just charge a little slower. Was there a case on the phone partially blocking the port?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usb 3.0 will still accept a regular micro usb charger. It will just charge a little slower. Was there a case on the phone partially blocking the port?

No case. I've had two chargers not fit in it. My LG G2 charger and Samsung works, the RocketFish rapid charger I got from BBY didn't fit and my older Micro USB charger doesn't work (forget what phone it came from. Lol)

 

But all four chargers (aside from the new Samsung charger) works on my G2.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This phone charges lightning fast. Really impressed! Tested lte in the south bay and it was a bit spotty with B41

 

Battery life is goos but android os and android system are the two major sources of battery drainage.

 

The phone is super fast and so far haven't had any lags with TouchWiz or in general

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone started running ART? I'd be interested to see how the battery life goes on ART vs dalvik on this phone.

I was under the impression it didn't have ART, like the S4.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Galaxy note 2 vers galaxy s 5 rf. S5 has 5dbm better than note but both signal are same some times , then s5 drop lower after awhile. Speed test with bad signal -115 galaxy note 2 3.0 to 4.5 megs down and galaxy s5 had same siganl and pulled 7.5 to 10 megs down. Going baltimore and dc today check band 41 speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone started running ART? I'd be interested to see how the battery life goes on ART vs dalvik on this phone.

 

I saw this question asked on XDA too, and I have to ask....what is ART?

 

Edit:  Nevermind, I finally found it once I stopped doing searches associated with Samsung and Galaxy S and switched to Android.  For anyone else in the dark as well, here you go:

 

http://www.xda-developers.com/android/the-art-of-android/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, you can go do Developer mode and turn it on.

 

Go to Settings>About Device 

Tap on Build number 6 or 7 times, it will turn on Developer Mode

Go back to Settings and Develop Options appears

Can change from Dalvik to ART.  (I haven't tried this)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, you can go do Developer mode and turn it on.

 

Go to Settings>About Device

Tap on Build number 6 or 7 times, it will turn on Developer Mode

Go back to Settings and Develop Options appears

Can change from Dalvik to ART. (I haven't tried this)

I know how to do it.

Is the option even there is the main concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know how to do it.

Is the option even there is the main concern.

Yes.

That's amazing really. I heard they weren't supporting ART until next iteration of Android.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would like to see a signalcheck pro screenshot of an LTE site from the g5. Thanks

 

sent by tapatalk from my LS-980 (G2)

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...