Jump to content

Sprint Launching New LTE Cities - December 2013


Recommended Posts

While no official press release has come down from Sprint, the coverage maps have been updated to indicate a new LTE launch is imminent! Below is a list Rickie and I put together approximating the cities that are to be launched in the coming days. It is not an exhaustive list, but should be fairly close!

 

Some notable launches:

 

San Diego, CA

Orlando, FL

St. Louis, MO

Panama City, FL

Birmingham, AL

El Paso, TX

Albany, NY

Louisville, KY

 

 


 

 

FULL LIST:

 

  • Ablertville, AL
  • Birmingham, Al
  • Decatur, AL
  • Florence, AL
  • Gulf Shores, AL
  • Huntsville, AL
  • Muscle Shoals, AL
  • Tuscaloosa, AL
  • El Dorado, AR
  • Little Rock, AR
  • Magnolia, AR
  • North Little Rock, AR
  • San Diego, CA
  • Lake City, FL
  • Marco Island, FL
  • Orlando, FL
  • Panama City, FL
  • Sebastian, FL
  • The Villages, FL
  • Vero Beach, FL
  • Vero Beach, FL
  • Agusta, GA
  • Albany, GA
  • Brunswick, GA
  • Columbus, GA
  • Cordele, GA
  • Bettendorf, IA
  • Cedar Rapids, IA
  • Davenport, IA
  • Boise, ID
  • Bliss, ID
  • Mountain Home, ID
  • Twin Falls, ID
  • East Moline, IL
  • Moline, IL
  • Rock Island, IL
  • Michigan City, IN
  • Louisville, KY
  • Abbeville, LA
  • Crowley, LA
  • DeRidder, LA
  • New Iberia, LA
  • Shreveport, LA
  • Alma, MI
  • Battle Creek, MI
  • Kalamazoon, MI
  • Ludington, MI
  • Midland, MI
  • Mt. Pleasant, MI
  • Muskegon, MI
  • Traverse City, MI
  • Pascagoula, MS
  • Branson, MO
  • St. Louis, MO
  • Hickory, NC
  • Lenoir, NC
  • Lumberton, NC
  • Lumberton, NC
  • Morganton, NC
  • Roanoke Rapids, NC
  • Rockingham, NC
  • Washintion, NC
  • Fargo, ND
  • Jamestown, NY
  • Albany, NY
  • Dunkirk, NY
  • Jameston, NY
  • Mina, NY
  • Schenectady, NY
  • Clumbiana, OH
  • Salem, OH
  • Bartlesville, OK
  • Clinton, OK
  • Elk City, OK
  • Norman, OK
  • Pauls Valley, OK
  • Sayre, OK
  • Lebanon, OR
  • Clinton, SC
  • Columbia, SC
  • Gaffney, SC
  • York, SC
  • Cookeville, TN
  • Martin, TN
  • Union City, TN
  • Dumas, TS
  • Abilene, TX
  • Alice, TX
  • Andrews, TX
  • Big Spring, TX
  • Carrizo Springs, TX
  • Clarendon, TX
  • El Paso, TX
  • Lubbock, TX
  • Lufkin, TX
  • Plainview, TX
  • Uvalde, TX
  • Virgin Islands, USA
  • Bremerton, WA
  • Pullman, WA
  • Silverdale, WA
  • Vancover, WA
  • Green Bay, WI
  • Madison, WI
  • Manitowoc, WI
  • Sturgeon Bay, WI
  • Like 18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can take Eunice, LA off the list.  That city has one site (southeast of the city) that is still NV 3G only.  It's the last site before roaming when traveling from south to north and from east to west through that city.  The cover map shows fringe LTE coverage near the city from the two adjacent sites in Church Point and Lawtell but that's due to the error/exaggeration in Sprint's LTE layer.

 

EDIT: Then for some reason they didn't put Opelousas on their map when in fact that site (only one in the city) has had LTE since 9/11/2013.  Maybe a CSFB thing since it's just 4G only and not 3G/4G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can take Eunice, LA off the list.  That city has one site (southeast of the city) that is still NV 3G only.  It's the last site before roaming when traveling from south to north and from east to west through that city.  The cover map shows fringe LTE coverage near the city from the two adjacent sites in Church Point and Lawtell but that's due to the error/exaggeration in Sprint's LTE layer.

 

EDIT: Then for some reason they didn't put Opelousas on their map when in fact that site (only one in the city) has had LTE since 9/11/2013.  Maybe a CSFB thing since it's just 4G only and not 3G/4G.

Dang. I didn't zoom in enough.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, Oct 29th (http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-expands-lte-coverage-map-and-turns-on-more-4g-lte-markets.htm)  So a month and a half, if you want to get technical.

A month, a month and a half, it's all the same thing :P

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we really stressing over an "official" announcement differing by 15 (ish) days.  I mean, really?  What..do you think deployment stopped during that time and just suddenly was all completed overnight for the announcement?  LOL....ok..sure.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we really stressing over an "official" announcement differing by 15 (ish) days.  I mean, really?  What..do you think deployment stopped during that time and just suddenly was all completed overnight for the announcement?  LOL....ok..sure.

Nope

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope

Good, then.  Because we all know from the wealth of knowledge available here at s4gru where all the latest accepted towers are located, months before the general public.  With that in mind the "launches," regardless of the timing of PR newsblasts,  are moot.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They put up a few LTE towers in St.Thomas. Two I know for sure. Still 3g some parts of island. My house north side for one.

There are 3 towers that have LTE on st thomas and st croix as of right now.  Not sure what's the status on the remaining 5 towers on St. thomas, the remaining 2 on st croix and the 1 on st john.  But I have seen work being done on some of the other towers that doesn't have lte so hopefully the remaining towers will come online soon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, I have been digging around the site off and on over the last few weeks since seeing it mentioned in Digiblur's XDA PRL thread hoping to find mention of 4g LTE rollout for Roanoke, VA 24012. Anyone have any info or able to direct me to an appropriate thread to monitor.

Thanks in advance.

 

Sent from my Up all Night Sleep all Day Nexus 5!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...