Jump to content

Softbank - New Sprint - Discussion


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

Sprint owns the usable WCS in the south east. I think it is time for a wcs for PCS swap. Even if they don't get much PCS. AJ is right. In year old discussions he and others valued Sprints wcs holdings.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint owns the usable WCS in the south east. I think it is time for a wcs for PCS swap. Even if they don't get much PCS. AJ is right. In year old discussions he and others valued Sprints wcs holdings. Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

I doubt they'll want to swap, AT&T will probably just buy it from Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as a hypothetical, deep in the future, can Sprint get hold of the 2.5Mhz left over from the lower CLR band, since each CLR allocation is 12.5MHz? Can we somehow rationally reallocate the spectrum so that each carrier gets 10+10Mhz?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wondering what Sprint will do in the southeast now, with SoLinc coming to some sort of nationwide agreement with whoever it was they were in talks with...I'd really like to see Sprint acquire some of the SoLinc holdings to use it...

 

Heck, I'd be happy if they would just Co-Locate on the tower that's 1 mile from my house, which the fiber under my driveway feeds. One can dream I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting write up by Masayoshi Son himself about learning from the past and not repeat mistakes.

Interesting to note how he has not held back and has yelled at Sprint Executives to get their act together.

Seems all existing marketing contracts have been cancelled since they haven't worked. (Those recent Sprint commercials are atrocious).

 

What was even more interesting is how he states

"Just like Vodafone in Japan, Sprint has gotten used to being a loser. It is perpetually stuck in third or fourth place in the U.S. telecommunications market. Some say the poor quality of its networks explains its position. This kind of excuse keeps Sprint from breaking the vicious cycle in which it is caught. There is a need for a change in mindset."

 

 TS

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting write up by Masayoshi Son himself about learning from the past and not repeat mistakes.

Interesting to note how he has not held back and has yelled at Sprint Executives to get their act together.

Seems all existing marketing contracts have been cancelled since they haven't worked. (Those recent Sprint commercials are atrocious).

 

What was even more interesting is how he states

 

TS

Totes Magotes!

 

Posted Image

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting to note how he has not held back and has yelled at Sprint Executives to get their act together.

 

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting write up by Masayoshi Son himself about learning from the past and not repeat mistakes.

Interesting to note how he has not held back and has yelled at Sprint Executives to get their act together.

Seems all existing marketing contracts have been cancelled since they haven't worked. (Those recent Sprint commercials are atrocious).

 

 TS

Do you have a link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

opps sorry I thought I put it in the post.

 

ok post edited and here it is too. 

 

TS

Glad to see he is doing what he is doing. I feel like he is right. Sprint definitely needed a push or a shove forward. They've been sitting on the hiatus forever now, its time to take the dive and make it or break it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint definitely needs a kick in the Fannie. Hesse and Company have been in crisis management mode for so long. Hunkered down in the bunker trying just to keep the company afloat. They don't know where to go next. They may be shell shocked and not capable of making the next moves. And Sprint's marketing is weak!

Hesse and Sprint executive leadership need to snap out of it fast. Otherwise it may be time to end that last era at Sprint and start fresh with a new one. Some new blood, starting at the top.

Sounds like Son is giving Hesse a reset button. He gets to start the last six months over again and take charge now and sweep in the new era Son demands. If he doesn't drag the team forward into the competitive fray, I don't expect Hesse around much longer.

Dan can either be the hero that was on top when Sprint finally turned the page. Or he can be the last relic of the old and dead Sprint. The choice is his. But I don't think Son has much attention span or patience. And in that regard, he does not fit the Japanese stereotype.

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint definitely needs a kick in the Fannie. Hesse and Company have been in crisis management mode for so long. Hunkered down in the bunker trying just to keep the company afloat. They don't know where to go next. They may be shell shocked and not capable of making the next moves. And Sprint's marketing is weak!

 

I think it's a very exciting time for Sprint.  I think Son will set a new expectation at Sprint.

 

I still remember Dan Hesse when original network vision came around - he said "We are going to under promise and over deliver."

 

I can't imagine the challenges of completely rebuilding a network from scratch but at the end of the day, it's your job as CEO to make sure that you have the right people and make sure they have the tools to accomplish their job.  Set the expectation and hold people accountable - that works too.

 

Maybe Steve Elfman isn't the right guy for the job.

 

I don't know any of the answers, I will say Dan has done a great job laying a foundation for the possibility of great success.  Their spectrum position is unmatched in the industry - they just need to execute.

 

Maybe they shouldn't be doing any marketing right now and invest it in their network.  When the network is rebuilt - go bonanza on the biggest marketing push ever.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Steve Elfman isn't the right guy for the job.

 

Or maybe he is just not the right Elfman.  Can we please get Jenna instead?

 

jenna-elfman-picture-3.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Sprint can afford to sit back and let T-Mobile take all the new subs in the market. And don't be mistaken.. the new ETF+phone payoff that T-Mobile is offering will definitely move people into considering T-Mobile. I overheard 2 AT&T users and 1 Sprint user at work today discussing it quite seriously. As soon as Sprint drops all contract requirements things will go better for them while also stopping the leakage of subs lured in by ETF payoff deals. The new Framily plans are really quite interesting and are a step in the right direction. I actually really, really like the offering of 1GB/3GB/Unlimited. It is a really good step forward.

 

I have been disappointed by Sprint's Network Vision progress where I live but it is mainly the delay that is causing that disappointment rather than the speed of the upgraded areas. It is easy to blame the delays on past Sprint decisions but how long can that excuse really be used? Lack of program execution on Network Vision is squarely on the shoulders of the current management and I do wonder how long that shortcoming can last before Softbank decides to really make big management changes at Sprint. I feel like Sprint right now is this huge bear waking up groggily from a long hibernation and stumbling side to side as it struggles toward the cave exit (a fully functional modern network). It will get there and it will be formidable, absolutely, but San needs a glass of water and a whip to wake Sprint up and get it really moving. 

 

 

As an aside, I think Sprint should end the preferred retailer/reseller program. Every time I have an issue and stop at these stores they redirect me to a Sprint corporate store. Additionally, the training feels really lackluster at the stores near me. I guess I feel like Sprint lacks control over these locations and how they present themselves and it shows in the experience I have there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint also needs a new website. The current one is completely dead last among the big 4 providers. Verizon is always making small changes to improve it, while Sprint's feels dated and cumbersome - it does not bring up an image of a modern wireless network

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totes Magotes!

 

1556396_10201229824047215_1322352353_o.j

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

And Sprint's marketing is weak!

 

Yeah, no kidding. They have James Earl Jones and Malcolm McDowell in a commercial and that's the best that they could come up with for them? Whoever came up with those commercials not only needs to be fired, but also banned for the advertising industry for life.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they shouldn't be doing any marketing right now and invest it in their network.  When the network is rebuilt - go bonanza on the biggest marketing push ever.

 

Well they need to market to keep their name out there but they need a better message. They have been horrible for years. Either aimless ads or talking about unlimited data while offering dial up speeds that people saw right through. Campaigns like "Can You Hear Me Now?, "Reliable" and "More Bars in More Places" resonated with customers and were effective. Of course the companies behind them backed the message up.

 

Maybe Sprint needs to be a little contrite and tell people they have listened to their customers and new management is spending billions and working hard to build a better network. Sure beats the crap they have been putting out. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I assume that any agreement is not perpetual and has an end date. - Trip
    • I think it is likely that T-Mobile will be forced to honor any existing US cellular roaming agreements in those areas as a condition of them taking over the spectrum.  In that case, there would be no improvement of service unless T-Mobile improves the service offering in those areas.
    • My understanding is the MNO carriers are the one who have objected to the use of cell phones in commercial planes.  I understand that it ties down too many cell phones at once, thus I can not see this changing. However this depends on how it is structured. Use of a different plmn for satellite service might make it possible for planes only to connect with satellite. Private pilots have been using cellphones in planes for many decades. Far fewer phones at a lower altitude.
    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...