Jump to content

Sprint TD-LTE 2500/2600mhz Discussion


Recommended Posts

Well folks now we know how that huge $16 Billion Network investment over 2 years will factor into future Sprint.

 

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like it to be 800>1900>2600. Off load to next band as each one gets loaded to ALMOST full Capacity. But ya are they experts and are probably right in how they will handle this 

I think ideally, the reverse makes more sense since decent 2600 signal (as we've seen from Roberts testing) would offer up the most performance, and drop down to 800 when signal strength is of essence.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did not think of that part. Most of our phones show 1x on the signal bars anyways. So for the non S4gru member it will appear if LTE and everything has great signal even though you may be riding voice on 1x and LTE might be on 2600 or 1900 and you only have a fair signal. But to a normal consumer they see full bars and love their service for that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think ideally, the reverse makes more sense since decent 2600 signal (as we've seen from Roberts testing) would offer up the most performance, and drop down to 800 when signal strength is of essence.

Yea i just know at my house I need 800 to get me even just 3 or 4 bars. But i will just have to see when they complete my tower how my phone acts and what channel it rides on most of the time. Ultimately i just want great voice calls inside for now. Decent LTeEservice would be great but voice is on my list first.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those look like those Samsung RRUs.

 

They do, huh.  He is going to try to take some zoomed in photos for us when he gets a chance.

Robert

 

I've got more servers than I know what to do with, but thanks for the offer. :-D

 

I'll probably drop these on Flickr so I can keep them Geotagged (and super res).

 

Weather permitting, the shots will be up around 9am Central.

 

Samsung TD-LTE RRUs are virtually indistinguishable from their PCS RRUs but pretty sure that pic is of a TD-LTE setup. Going to be fun for those in the IBEZ trying to figure out if they're using PCS only setups or td-lte setups. 

 

0LthV9d.png

 

zwpkuFY.png

 

LjQRS7B.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDMA1X 800 will take care of that.

 

AJ

Yes, as long as they leave us all idle on 800, we all have a boatload of bars and great service. I question how long it will be until the 800 1X can handle the load and they have to do something.  Right now, only some of the customers are on the 800, As more are able to get 800, can it be overloaded??  If they force some of us to idle on 1900, the bars decrease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't give the higher ups any ideas! 

 

No ideas necessary.  Perfunctory "signal bars" have long been based on CDMA1X signal, not on EV-DO nor LTE signal.  What do you want, two, three, or even four sets of "signal bars"?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea i just know at my house I need 800 to get me even just 3 or 4 bars. But i will just have to see when they complete my tower how my phone acts and what channel it rides on most of the time. Ultimately i just want great voice calls inside for now. Decent LTeEservice would be great but voice is on my list first.

Well their is nothing stopping the phone from connecting CDMA 1x 800 voice and whatever available band on data at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No ideas necessary.  Perfunctory "signal bars" have long been based on CDMA1X signal, not on EV-DO nor LTE signal.  What do you want, two, three, or even four sets of "signal bars"?

 

AJ

This reminds me of when ATT's network was on the fritz after the iPhone, and instead of addressing the issue with JUST network upgrades, they decided that more bars displayed on the iPhone was the solution!

Edited by nexgencpu
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, a slight blip can be overcome by error correction and resending a block or two of data.    But any significant drop in the stream will surely bother video.

IMHO you should not be watching video driving 75 mph.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now, only some of the customers are on the 800, As more are able to get 800, can it be overloaded??

 

Idle state mobiles camped on CDMA1X 800 do not increase the carrier loading at all.  They are just "there."

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No ideas necessary.  Perfunctory "signal bars" have long been based on CDMA1X signal, not on EV-DO nor LTE signal.  What do you want, two, three, or even four sets of "signal bars"?

 

AJ

cough *cough* Signal check pro! love them bars!!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO ou should not be watching video driving 75 mph.

Passengers? Carpools? Trains? Airplanes ;)

 

I am happy for today's news mostly because it points to a quicker upgrade to the GMOs that I am 4 to 8 miles from (quicker 800mhz to hopefully stop relying on an airrave)...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idle state mobiles camped on CDMA1X 800 do not increase the carrier loading at all.  They are just "there."

 

AJ

But But, Can you have a mobile camped on 800 just for the bars and then send it a call on 1900 without causing any havoc. Is the system capable of doing this??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cough *cough* Signal check pro! love them bars!!

 

What "bars"?  SignalCheck Pro provides signal strength figures in dBm units.  No one is disputing the value of that.  But the hoi polloi, who could barely pass high school chemistry, would see those negative sign metrics and emit a collective, "HUH?!"

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But But, Can you have a mobile camped on 800 just for the bars and then send it a call on 1900 without causing any havoc. Is the system capable of doing this??

 

Absolutely.  VZW has had dual band CDMA1X 850/1900 networks for years.  This is nothing new, guys.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With 2500 LTE going to NV siters now will S4GRU add tracking for LTE 800 and 2600  like the current 1900 LTE, 800 CDMA, and good old 3G? Any guess if Robert will get any 2500 site acceptance reports? or 800 LTE later?  

 

Which will come first on the average NV site 800 LTE on a NV site or 2500?

 

Tri band panels seem more reasonable to expect eventually now to me, but I think they won't be available in time for current sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well their is nothing stopping the phone from connecting CDMA 1x 800 voice and whatever available band on data at the same time.

Also, you might end up in a situation where the Clearwire site might even be closer than the Sprint site. It could end up being the best of both worlds, and eventually, even better signal if sprint decides to add NV to the Clear site (unlikely but you never know) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What "bars"?  SignalCheck Pro provides signal strength figures in dBm units.  No one is disputing the value of that.  But the hoi polloi, who could barely pass high school chemistry, would see those negative sign metrics and emit a collective, "HUH?!"

 

AJ

Bars or dBm readings, its used for the same reference one more accurate than the other, but I get your point..another thing, dont underestimate high school chemistry, I graduated in 97 and their is no way in shit hell I would pass that right now! LOL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...another thing, dont underestimate high school chemistry, I graduated in 97 and their is no way in shit hell I would pass that right now! LOL 

 

Maybe I should have used high school biology instead.  You know, those who could barely understand anything beyond "penis" and "vagina."

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With 2500 LTE going to NV siters now will S4GRU add tracking for LTE 800 and 2600 like the current 1900 LTE, 800 CDMA, and good old 3G? Any guess if Robert will get any 2500 site acceptance reports? or 800 LTE later?

 

Which will come first on the average NV site 800 LTE on a NV site or 2500?

 

Tri band panels seem more reasonable to expect eventually now to me, but I think they won't be available in time for current sites.

Once I start receiving official LTE 800 or LTE 2500 site acceptances, I will definitely add them to our maps. As far as triband panels, I don't think so. The downtilt difference between 800 and 2600 can be so much more disparate to make a single panel to not be practical.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With 2500 LTE going to NV siters now will S4GRU add tracking for LTE 800 and 2600  like the current 1900 LTE, 800 CDMA, and good old 3G? Any guess if Robert will get any 2500 site acceptance reports? or 800 LTE later?  

 

Which will come first on the average NV site 800 LTE on a NV site or 2500?

 

Tri band panels seem more reasonable to expect eventually now to me, but I think they won't be available in time for current sites.

 

Actually the industry already calls the ones installed for 800/1900 triband since there are three distinct sections inside the antenna unit.  The 6 cables are divided between the 3 bands.  It just so happens that the ones they are installing have two of the same bands.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure excited about all this. I can't wait to have a triband phone, but Sprint tells me I will have to wait till June of next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...