Jump to content

Sprint Small Cell Deployment


Recommended Posts

Here's the last public information Sprint gave about small cells.  Insiders may know more.  I would say at some point in 2014 once NV is close to done.  A similar time frame for LTE-A

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprints-tarazi-promises-hetnet-focus-network-vision-20/2012-10-04

 

 

Sprint's Tarazi promises HetNet focus in Network Vision 2.0
October 4, 2012 | By Mike Dano

iyad%20tarazi.jpgIyad Tarazi, Sprint Nextel's (NYSE:S) vice president of network development and engineering, said the next phase of the carrier's Network Vision network modernization plan involves integrating small cells and Wi-Fi to create a seamless connection for users. In comments to FierceBroadbandWireless, Tarazi said Sprint's Network Vision 2.0 will integrate the carrier's CDMA network and its LTE networks at 1900 MHz and 800 MHz with picocells, femtocells and Wi-Fi. Specifically, Sprint is ramping up an LTE picocell deployment strategy with an initial focus on indoor deployments followed by outdoor deployments in 2013-2014. Alcatel-Lucent's (NASDAQ: ALU) lightRadio metrocell architecture and Samsung's small cell gear will play a role. Tarazi discusses Sprint's overall HetNet strategy in this Hot Seat.


Read more: Sprint's Tarazi promises HetNet focus in Network Vision 2.0 - FierceWireless http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprints-tarazi-promises-hetnet-focus-network-vision-20/2012-10-04#ixzz2Wp2el5LO
Subscribe at FierceWireless

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is already developing Small Cells for FIT deployment this year.  Small Cells should be a big part of capex starting in 2014.

 

Robert

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats good to hear

 

Sprint is already developing Small Cells for FIT deployment this year.  Small Cells should be a big part of capex starting in 2014.

 

Robert

 

 

Here's the last public information Sprint gave about small cells.  Insiders may know more.  I would say at some point in 2014 once NV is close to done.  A similar time frame for LTE-A

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprints-tarazi-promises-hetnet-focus-network-vision-20/2012-10-04

Thats good to hear, thanks for the info

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"There are no small cells, only small e-penises."

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Any update on thier small cell deployment?

 

I don't think small cell deployment will occur until 2015.  With the Clearwire purchase their macro cell deployment plans went exponentially up.  Sprint needs to get on the ball and start deploying 2.5 GHz on every single Sprint tower as soon as 800 MHz LTE NV 1.0 is wrapping up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think small cell deployment will occur until 2015. With the Clearwire purchase their macro cell deployment plans went exponentially up. Sprint needs to get on the ball and start deploying 2.5 GHz on every single Sprint tower as soon as 800 MHz LTE NV 1.0 is wrapping up.

 

Supposedly they are starting in q2 with 2.5 deployment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supposedly they are starting in q2 with 2.5 deployment.

 

Hopefully we will get some more information on Sprint tower 2.5 GHz at the Q4 CC.  In terms of the Q2 2014 start, I wouldn't be surprised if its delayed.  They still haven't finished upgrading all the Clearwire sites which to me should be #1 priority since the 2.5 GHz infrastructure is already in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully we will get some more information on Sprint tower 2.5 GHz at the Q4 CC. In terms of the Q2 2014 start, I wouldn't be surprised if its delayed. They still haven't finished upgrading all the Clearwire sites which to me should be #1 priority since the 2.5 GHz infrastructure is already in place.

Cant thwy still start the deployment on the network vision sites even though they havent finished the clearwire sites...

 

I know they said 2.5 will be their main focus but i really hope they deploy it faster than the 1900 roll out. Seems like data demands increase higher and higher each day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant thwy still start the deployment on the network vision sites even though they havent finished the clearwire sites...

 

I know they said 2.5 will be their main focus but i really hope they deploy it faster than the 1900 roll out. Seems like data demands increase higher and higher each day

 

In a perfect world  they probably could but the problem right now I would imagine is equipment and manpower.  Unless Sprint has the same NV crews who do all parts of the NV equipment installation for 800/1900/2500 MHz (which currently doesn't happen...Sprint has different crews for all aspects of installation.  Ex: cabinet installers, LTE integration crews, antenna panel/RRU installers, electrical power crews, backhaul crews,etc), I don't see this happening.  Sprint's goal right now is to ensure all 39K Sprint sites are upgraded with NV equipment first.  Once a site is finished these crews should be moving to upgrading the rest of the sites still in that market that have not been touched with NV OR upgrading those sites that have just 3G only accepted to 4G.  There are still way too many red dots on the NV Complete maps that still need LTE 1900 upgraded which tells me that a lot of upgraded NV equipment sites still need backhaul and couldn't support 2.5 GHz LTE anyways.

 

At some point, Sprint needs to complete their 1900 MHz rollout 100% before trying to install new bands.  Critics of Sprint already claim that Sprint is all over the place and can't focus on a single task.  There are plenty of Sprint customers all over the US that have still not had a lick of LTE in sight so I would say that 2.5 GHz is not as high of a priority currently than LTE 1900 deployment.  The Clearwire 2.5 GHz LTE sites should be able to hold over many of the major markets in the mean time until Sprint can get to it.  The scope of the NV project is too big and keeps getting larger and larger as we add more puzzle pieces into the mix especially post Softbank.   I know we all have a tendency to want Sprint to do 10 things at once but that is just not reality.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perfect world they probably could but the problem right now I would imagine is equipment and manpower. Unless Sprint has the same NV crews who do all parts of the NV equipment installation for 800/1900/2500 MHz (which currently doesn't happen...Sprint has different crews for all aspects of installation. Ex: cabinet installers, LTE integration crews, antenna panel/RRU installers, electrical power crews, backhaul crews,etc), I don't see this happening. Sprint's goal right now is to ensure all 39K Sprint sites are upgraded with NV equipment first. Once a site is finished these crews should be moving to upgrading the rest of the sites still in that market that have not been touched with NV OR upgrading those sites that have just 3G only accepted to 4G. There are still way too many red dots on the NV Complete maps that still need LTE 1900 upgraded which tells me that a lot of upgraded NV equipment sites still need backhaul and couldn't support 2.5 GHz LTE anyways.

 

At some point, Sprint needs to complete their 1900 MHz rollout 100% before trying to install new bands. Critics of Sprint already claim that Sprint is all over the place and can't focus on a single task. There are plenty of Sprint customers all over the US that have still not had a lick of LTE in sight so I would say that 2.5 GHz is not as high of a priority currently than LTE 1900 deployment. The Clearwire 2.5 GHz LTE sites should be able to hold over many of the major markets in the mean time until Sprint can get to it. The scope of the NV project is too big and keeps getting larger and larger as we add more puzzle pieces into the mix especially post Softbank. I know we all have a tendency to want Sprint to do 10 things at once but that is just not reality.

Yea you are right. I hope we get a more detailed plan about their network and marketing goals this year. Like I said before, for sprint to publicly say 2014 is their year and,not tmobiles,they must have something up their sleeves but of course they cant do anything until the network is decent enough for them to market their services.

 

I just hope the final result will be worth the wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

A light reading article interview with John Saw on the topic of what is 5G and sprints involvement. http://www.lightreading.com/mobile/5g/sprints-saw-5g-opp-is-moving-signal-closer-to-customers-/d/d-id/709571?_mc=RSS_LR_EDT

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

June 2015 any small cells out there yet. Sprint so far behind on what they predicted in future . I guessoney talks first not ideas.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/842-network-visionlte-shentel-market-shenandoah-valleyhagerstownharrisburg/page-37

See post 725 in the above thread.  Photos of in-service site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

http://www.rcrwireless.com/20150709/network-infrastructure/sprint-small-cell-deployment-update-tag4

 

 

Sprint’s small cell rollout has been a hot topic all summer, and even though it has not been announced yet, recruiters and installers are getting ready to move fast. Sprint has confirmed nothing, but hopeful vendors are now expecting the carrier to deploy up to 70,000 outdoor picocells.

...

 

Mobilitie is expected to a primary partner for Sprint, charged with securing the sites and negotiating terms for deployment. Deployment of 70,000 outdoor small cells would require the acquisition of roughly the same number of discrete sites. Operators typically look for utility poles, lamp posts, church steeples and other structures that rise above most roof levels. Most sites will require zoning, permitting and negotiations with municipal authorities.

...

In addition to Mobilitie, Nokia and Airspan have been named as potential Sprint vendors for its small cell rollout. Airspan has developed outdoor small cells that are optimized for pole-mounted deployments and that leverage a virtualized radio access network. Nokia’s Flexi-Zone microcell/picocell base stations support the most common LTE bands and support integrated Wi-Fi.

..

 

Samsung B25 & B41, Ericsson RBS 64xx/65xx B25, Nokia Flexi Zone 2.5, ALcatel-Lucent MCO B25 & B41 + Airspan Airsynergy B41. 

 

Soon™

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Soon *TM  (soon means sometime in the next 50 years)

 

j/k

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...