Jump to content

Comments related to the NV Running List Thread


Recommended Posts

Well my fault for not reading everything completely. Laziness lol. Ok well in that case it doesn't look like the first round is anywhere near being complete...

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

It will take several months to complete many of the markets, as it is not uncommon for a single given market to have over 1000 towers. However, even without all the towers being complete, Network Vision/LTE should be pretty usable across the market. And, Many second round markets are scheduled to start before the first round markets are complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It will take several months to complete many of the markets, as it is not uncommon for a single given market to have over 1000 towers. However, even without all the towers being complete, Network Vision/LTE should be pretty usable across the market. And, Many second round markets are scheduled to start before the first round markets are complete.

 

Thank you Ben! Ok so having said that do they work in the larger cities of a certain market first? For instance the Orlando market... I live more in the central part of Florida. Polk County, 33884 area. Not a huge area in my opinion, but heavily populated. It is in desperate need of some better signal.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need to change that verbiage. I have since learned more about the deployment since then and that is not completely accurate.

 

Backhaul is one of the biggest factors in a market start. Sprint has dozens of backhaul contractors working around the country. The backhaul is not being performed by the NV OEM's. But enough needs to be complete before they can get started in any market. This is one of the biggest causes of issues in the SF Bay market.

 

Almost all of the work in each market is being done by subcontractors hired by each OEM. The OEM acts like a general contractor, managing the work performed by the subcontractors. The OEM also provides the equipment. OEM's have hired many subcontractors. Sometimes a sub will work in several markets for that OEM, sometimes only one.

 

For the most part, preceding markets do not have a lot of effect on the market starts in the next round. Only if the OEM doesn't have the people to manage the new market because they are tied up handling issues at the previous market. Or in the case of a carry over subcontractor.

 

I think I will go clear up the language in the NV Running thread.

 

Robert via Galaxy Nexus using Forum Runner

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Ben! Ok so having said that do they work in the larger cities of a certain market first? For instance the Orlando market... I live more in the central part of Florida. Polk County, 33884 area. Not a huge area in my opinion, but heavily populated. It is in desperate need of some better signal.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Thats a little too specific for me to answer... from what I've seen, the deployment is rather random in some of the markets that have started, IMO. So, I really cannot answer that part with certainty. However, The schedule maps in the premier sponsor area do give dates of when each individual tower is expected to be upgraded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Thats a little too specific for me to answer... from what I've seen, the deployment is rather random in some of the markets that have started, IMO. So, I really cannot answer that part with certainty. However, The schedule maps in the premier sponsor area do give dates of when each individual tower is expected to be upgraded.

 

Ok yea I thought it might have been. I appreciate the help though man. I'm already a sponsor. How much of a donation to become a premier sponsor?

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok yea I thought it might have been. I appreciate the help though man. I'm already a sponsor. How much of a donation to become a premier sponsor?

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Once your cumulative total donations reach $100 then you get upgraded to Premier Sponsor and you never lose that level.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NV sites are spaced apart based on 1900 propagation characteristics. Even if Clearwire was on every NV tower, their coverage would look like a bunch of islands covering a city. They would still need to come back in and infill between NV towers.

 

ClWR's frequencies not suitable for wide-area coverage. Only useful for hot spots to off-load capacity from G-block. Depending upon the commercial arrangement between Sprint and CLWR - let's asume it is a fixed price per site rather than usage-sensitive per GB pricing, then when multi-modality FD/TD-LTE devices are availalbe, they would search for the 2.5ghz freq first in order to off-load traffic from the 1.9ghz band, and if you are not covered by that "hot spot", then you ride the 1.9ghz band that's now presumably less congested based upon the off-load of heavy traffic to 2.5ghz. This architecture will not work if CLWR insists on usage-sensitive pricing because it turns the economics upside-down for Sprint, and it is exactly counter to the strategic capacity advantage that CLWR's "fat pipes" would offer, but CLWR has chosen to pursue dumb paths before, so who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ClWR's frequencies not suitable for wide-area coverage. Only useful for hot spots to off-load capacity from G-block. Depending upon the commercial arrangement between Sprint and CLWR - let's asume it is a fixed price per site rather than usage-sensitive per GB pricing, then when multi-modality FD/TD-LTE devices are availalbe, they would search for the 2.5ghz freq first in order to off-load traffic from the 1.9ghz band, and if you are not covered by that "hot spot", then you ride the 1.9ghz band that's now presumably less congested based upon the off-load of heavy traffic to 2.5ghz. This architecture will not work if CLWR insists on usage-sensitive pricing because it turns the economics upside-down for Sprint, and it is exactly counter to the strategic capacity advantage that CLWR's "fat pipes" would offer, but CLWR has chosen to pursue dumb paths before, so who knows.

 

Because Sprint will have usage based pricing on CLWR LTE, Sprint will likely not default to CLWR LTE first, but rather last. LTE 1900 first, then shunt users off to LTE 800 when 1900 starts to hit the predetermined congestion point, prior to performance degradation. Then 800 LTE users get shunted off to 2500 (if available) when its lone LTE carrier crosses the performance threshold.

 

2500 first would make more sense, if it weren't for the usage based pricing from CLWR. However, if Sprint should buy them out as they start deploying LTE, that could make this scenario possible of defaulting to 2500 LTE first.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Sprint will have usage based pricing on CLWR LTE, Sprint will likely not default to CLWR LTE first, but rather last. LTE 1900 first, then shunt users off to LTE 800 when 1900 starts to hit the predetermined congestion point, prior to performance degradation. Then 800 LTE users get shunted off to 2500 (if available) when its lone LTE carrier crosses the performance threshold.

 

2500 first would make more sense, if it weren't for the usage based pricing from CLWR. However, if Sprint should buy them out as they start deploying LTE, that could make this scenario possible of defaulting to 2500 LTE first.

 

Robert

 

Because 2500 first makes a lot more sense, ultimately the placeholder usage-sensitive pricing deal that exists currently will need to change. As we've seen with propagating WiMax to Boost and Virgin, because Sprint now enjoys fixed-cost "owner's economics", CLWR benefits if Sprint actually wants to use the CLWR network (because it will end up creating a longer revenue tail for CLWR) rather than having Sprint view the CLWR network as the bandwidth of last resort.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It always seemed like the Clear deal was a way to sucker other companies into funding WiMax without losing the spectrum licenses due to inability to meet coverage requirements. I agree that Sprint needs to buy them out when they return to profitability.

 

Part of Sprints problem is that they can't afford to bid on any spectrum that might come up for sale. Altel would have been a perfect buy to expand their network if they weren't hemmoraging money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, looks like Robert updated the Running List thread to include estimation dates for Chicago and LA of September 2012 without the update articles yet. Appears that those 2 markets will be next for Network Vision update articles. Can't wait to read those.

 

Also noticed the Second Round markets order has been shifted around where the Florida markets are on the top of the list now and some other markets got pushed up and down. Detroit folks should be pretty happy since they got bumped up from the 19th to the 6th spot while San Diego folks will be sad that they got bumped down from the 11th spot to the 17th spot.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, looks like Robert updated the Running List thread to include estimation dates for Chicago and LA of September 2012 without the update articles yet. Appears that those 2 markets will be next for Network Vision update articles. Can't wait to read those.

 

Also noticed the Second Round markets order has been shifted around where the Florida markets are on the top of the list now and some other markets got pushed up and down. Detroit folks should be pretty happy since they got bumped up from the 19th to the 6th spot while San Diego folks will be sad that they got bumped down from the 11th spot to the 17th spot.

 

Nice catch! I find it ironic that Chicago is not even officially listed as an initial LTE market, yet Chicago has the most sites complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow' date=' looks like Robert updated the Running List thread to include estimation dates for Chicago and LA of September 2012 without the update articles yet. Appears that those 2 markets will be next for Network Vision update articles. Can't wait to read those.

 

Also noticed the Second Round markets order has been shifted around where the Florida markets are on the top of the list now and some other markets got pushed up and down. Detroit folks should be pretty happy since they got bumped up from the 19th to the 6th spot while San Diego folks will be sad that they got bumped down from the 11th spot to the 17th spot.[/quote']

 

Yes. The Chicago and LA articles are already written. So I went ahead and updated the NV Running List thread a little early.

 

You are very observant about some shifting in the 2nd Round order. But don't read too much into it. I did start moving around some markets that were toward the bottom which need to be toward the top. I was trying to do it from memory. So it is not a completed order. It will get better sorted in the coming days and weeks.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also noticed the Second Round markets order has been shifted around where the Florida markets are on the top of the list now and some other markets got pushed up and down.

 

This is outstanding news! I'm in the Orlando Market! Hopefully NV will be here soon! Need 3G to work and LTE would be fantastic! Hope this pushes the ORL market up! I would check. But don't have the money to become a premier sponsor. Lol

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. The Chicago and LA articles are already written. So I went ahead and updated the NV Running List thread a little early.

 

You are very observant about some shifting in the 2nd Round order. But don't read too much into it. I did start moving around some markets that were toward the bottom which need to be toward the top. I was trying to do it from memory. So it is not a completed order. It will get better sorted in the coming days and weeks.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Call me a geek but the reason why I knew about the change in the 2nd round market ordering is because I made a copy of the list of the 2nd round market ordering right after the last 2nd round market was announced back in March or so and I knew Miami was not on the top of the 2nd round list. Then I just analyzed the differences between the 2 lists and noticed all the Florida markets got bumped up to the top.

 

I'll be interested to see what the updated list order is for the 2nd round markets in the upcoming weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I noticed that the Running List got updated again today and I noticed more Second Round market changes. I take it that the Second Round market list ordering is now updated with the latest information? I noticed San Diego, New Orleans and PR/VI markets got bumped up pretty high.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I noticed that the Running List got updated again today and I noticed more Second Round market changes. I take it that the Second Round market list ordering is now updated with the latest information? I noticed San Diego' date=' New Orleans and PR/VI markets got bumped up pretty high.[/quote']

 

I spent three to four hours doing in depth schedule reviews preparing for more schedule articles. There will be a little more jockeying soon. I'm only half way through the Second Round schedules.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spent three to four hours doing in depth schedule reviews preparing for more schedule articles. There will be a little more jockeying soon. I'm only half way through the Second Round schedules.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Robert, You're the Man! Thanks for keeping us so up-to-date! This is why your site is so great.

 

Can you answer me this? Is there any word/hint of those 3rd round markets getting moved into round 2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Robert' date=' You're the Man! Thanks for keeping us so up-to-date! This is why your site is so great.

 

Can you answer me this? Is there any word/hint of those 3rd round markets getting moved into round 2?[/quote']

 

Sorry. No changes there. Third round markets are all finishing up RF design and will start site planning and permitting soon.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. No changes there. Third round markets are all finishing up RF design and will start site planning and permitting soon.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Cool.. I'm just happy to be "in the know." And that is thanks to S4GRU. So is Dec - Feb still a safe estimate for those markets that "may be moving into round two?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Cool.. I'm just happy to be "in the know." And that is thanks to S4GRU. So is Dec - Feb still a safe estimate for those markets that "may be moving into round two?"

 

I don't want to say definitively until I complete this intensive schedule study I'm working on. But if I were using deductive reasoning skills based on what ive seen so far, I'd say yes.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so i was looking at the CT siting council website and T-mobile is trying to replace a guyed lattice tower to a monopine so they can add there antennas to it. as i was reading it i saw nextel was on it but not sprint. sprint could use it but will see when NV comes to town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...