Jump to content

Comments related to the NV Running List Thread


Recommended Posts

Can't get backhaul to support it at the site location. Could not negotiate changing the leases with the site owner. Zoning changes that allow grandfathered operations but not new operations. And I am sure there are others. However, it is such a small fraction of sites that will not get LTE 1900 that is almost not worth noting.

 

Robert

 

Ah, well that makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any word on the "West Iowa/Nebraska" market? I understand they are working more densely populated areas first but Omaha is the 42nd most populous city. Just curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any word on the "West Iowa/Nebraska" market? I understand they are working more densely populated areas first but Omaha is the 42nd most populous city. Just curious.

 

It is not in the first two rounds of Network Vision at this time. My market is even larger as the 32nd largest city, and no dice. Unfortunately, with a deployment plan, there will be some early winners. Not everyone can be in the beginning. We can commiserate together. :(

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Robert, maybe I'll go with a WiMax phone when I upgrade in August and get an LTE phone in 2014. Even though Sprint doesn't officially have WiMax here there are some Clear towers with coverage at least where I work, I can roam on those right?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Robert, maybe I'll go with a WiMax phone when I upgrade in August and get an LTE phone in 2014. Even though Sprint doesn't officially have WiMax here there are some Clear towers with coverage at least where I work, I can roam on those right?.

 

Yes, you can use all Clearwire WiMax sites as native coverage until 2015. I too occasionally use WiMax protection sites here in New Mexico. I'm not certain when I'm going to upgrade yet, either.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea when Sacramento, CA is getting Lte. Sprintfeed is saying that Stockton is testing Lte.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Edited by Juned
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea when Sacramento, CA is getting Lte. Sprintfeed is saying that Stockton is testing Lte.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

The Upper Central Valley market is not in the first two rounds of Network Vision. SprintFeed is not even around any more, when did they say that? Also, I do not see any LTE FIT's in the Stockton area. By my information, planning and design is not yet completed in this market. They can't deploy anything without it being designed first.

 

It doesn't appear to me that anything is going on in Stockton at all. The closest activity I see to Stockton is in the SF Bay market. In the Brentwood and Altamont Pass areas. There will be some sites in those areas that are scheduled to begin work in July. However, there have been lots of delays in the SF Bay market deployment. So I don't even know if those dates are still good.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was tweeted my Mark today. Here is a linkhttp://www.technobuffalo.com/news/wireless/sprints-network-vision-4g-lte-additional-markets-revealed/

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was tweeted my Mark today. Here is a linkhttp://www.technobuf...rkets-revealed/

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

I have seen this slide. These are not markets. These are dates that 4G cores will be ready. Sprint is housing a 4G core in Stockton. I better get a hold of Mark.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I have seen this slide. These are not markets. These are dates that 4G cores will be ready. Sprint is housing a 4G core in Stockton. I better get a hold of Mark.

 

Robert

4G core?

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Think switch, but for 4G LTE data.

 

Robert

 

Like the main switch building I noted in moorisivlle, nc long ago?...if so that's a big build out there as I thought they would of just upgraded it to run through same locations if possible...actually having to build out main switch centers is something I never thought of during this whole thing ..

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the main switch building I noted in moorisivlle, nc long ago?...if so that's a big build out there as I thought they would of just upgraded it to run through same locations if possible...actually having to build out main switch centers is something I never thought of during this whole thing ..

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

I'm not certain why they are separate from switches, but in most cases they are.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not certain why they are separate from switches, but in most cases they are.

 

Robert

 

Only guess is they those instances they don't have enough space to fit needed switches in those already built centers?...

 

I guess I just assumed if current switches couldn't be upgraded to handle the extra data on top of reg stuff then they'd add to the location...guess that's not possible at all places...

 

Tossing darts to see what sticks there. Lol

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only guess is they those instances they don't have enough space to fit needed switches in those already built centers?...

 

I guess I just assumed if current switches couldn't be upgraded to handle the extra data on top of reg stuff then they'd add to the location...guess that's not possible at all places...

 

Tossing darts to see what sticks there. Lol

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

Sounds good to me!

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sounds good to me!

 

Robert

 

Haha, very confident. Lol

 

To be clear here: 4G Node= 4G switch center correct.?

 

Like the big cdma switch centers that handle multiple towers and such...just LTE instead of cdma/evdo handling...

 

 

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, very confident. Lol

 

To be clear here: 4G Node= 4G switch center correct.?

 

Like the big cdma switch centers that handle multiple towers and such...just LTE instead of cdma/evdo handling...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

Based on the context of how I see them in the documents I have read, 4G LTE Cores and LTE DDC's are used synonymously and have always discussed with CDMA switch centers. I can also see through schematics that ALL 4G LTE data gets routed from the site, through backhaul to the 4G LTE Core that each site is assigned to and then gets distributed to the internet.

 

However, I don't have much more understanding about the LTE Cores than this. I will admit where my knowledge is short so I don't have someone come along and try to discredit me. However, I am picturing it exactly the way you are outlining above.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure I've seen this officially published by Sprint. Sprint says here that their 4G LTE will average 6 to 8 Mbps on the down-link with peak speeds of 25Mbps

http://shop2.sprint.....html#tab_where

 

Also, note that Unlimited is continued to be emphasized. :)

 

In comparison:

VZW states: 5-12 Mbps for the download.

http://aboutus.veriz...Advantages.html

ATT states: 5-12 on their 4G LTE

http://www.att.com/g...fairs?pid=20879

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure I've seen this officially published by Sprint. Sprint says here that their 4G LTE will average 6 to 8 Mbps on the down-link with peak speeds of 25Mbps

http://shop2.sprint.....html#tab_where

 

Also, note that Unlimited is continued to be emphasized. :)

 

In comparison:

VZW states: 5-12 Mbps for the download.

http://aboutus.veriz...Advantages.html

ATT states: 5-12 on their 4G LTE

http://www.att.com/g...fairs?pid=20879

 

Thanks Ben. Sounds very consistent to what I reported in this article: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-83-new-network-visionlte-deployment-details-and-central-jersey-market-work-is-under-way-with-several-sites-live/

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Based on the context of how I see them in the documents I have read, 4G LTE Cores and LTE DDC's are used synonymously and have always discussed with CDMA switch centers. I can also see through schematics that ALL 4G LTE data gets routed from the site, through backhaul to the 4G LTE Core that each site is assigned to and then gets distributed to the internet.

 

However, I don't have much more understanding about the LTE Cores than this. I will admit where my knowledge is short so I don't have someone come along and try to discredit me. However, I am picturing it exactly the way you are outlining above.

 

Robert

 

Well then we must be right then. Hehe

 

 

Least till AJ chimes in and drops bombs of knowledge. LOL

Seriously AJ you know too much. Jkjk

We need to organize a sponsors quiz of AJ's spectrum knowledge...I think he'd dominate 95% scoring easily! Lol

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea when Sacramento, CA is getting Lte. Sprintfeed is saying that Stockton is testing Lte.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

I have written a response article to the TechnoBuffalo piece: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-162-clarification-on-reported-new-sprint-4g-lte-cities/

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not certain why they are separate from switches' date=' but in most cases they are.

 

Robert[/quote']

 

Here's my educated guess:

 

Sprint is installing shiny new site equipment with new backhaul (microwave, fiber, or what have you). So they set up shiny new network "cores", or data centers, with all the network routers and such. Cutover is probably much simpler and less disruptive than trying to work with the legacy locations.

 

That's what I figger anyway.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • About 2/3 Done with finding Dish sites in Columbus traditional metro. Signal from some sites travels across the county. On a practical basis that means you might need to search a 4 county area to find a site. It also means more interference and less signal where it should be.  I would think the ideal site coverage would be half or a bit more of surrounding sites unless an edge site (ie boomer site). Comments welcome.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/smartphones-devices/will-network-operators-cheer-a-google-v-apple-ai-battle- Also mentions glasses and other devices.
    • This site is built but not live. No mmWave or LAA but there is any empty fourth mount, probably for C-band or mmWave at some point down the line. eNB 41150 is still live. eNB 41188 is decommissioned but as far as I can tell the site at 200 West 55th is not built yet. This site is live gNB 1346302. This site is live gNB 1092074 This site is live gNB 1371671 This site is live gNB 1371860 — — — — — Sprint eNB 6156 -> T-Mobile gNB 1349260 Sprint eNB Unknown -> T-Mobile gNB 1325016 — — — — — Bonus T-Mobile 5G small cell, gNB 1348688 in Queens:  
    • FTTH JVs are city by city as well, so it's not going to really be sector by sector. It sounds like TMo wants to be able to sell everyone home broadband, but if that requires building additional infrastructure that infra will take the form of FTTH builds rather than mobile densification. Which involves tradeoffs, but the product is better than e.g. what AT&T is doing for me right now, which is offering only Internet Air in an area where they have 100/20 DSL available but not (yet) fiber.
    • Hopefully they do not wait until these sectors get so overloaded that they start getting nasty reviews and people abandon them. Getting fiber coverage to the area of a overloaded sector can take a year or more. I also question if this can all be managed.  Lots of sectors all over the country can get congested fairly quick.  Lots of work and money to get fiber installed and there goes the profitability on the venture.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...