Jump to content

Paynefanbro
 Share

Recommended Posts

They are a match made in heaven, I can't stand either of them. I have flown on US airways quite a few times and I would say that 75% of the times there was always a delay of some sort and american airlines have some of the worst looking planes not to mention their maintenance record is poor. Hell, just last month I flew from atlanta to miami on american and after the plane had landed I just so happen to look outside at the wing and noticed that there was about a 10 to 12 inch section of the flaps that had broken off. Now I am not an aeronautical engineer but that can't be safe at all. I took a picture of it and as I was getting off the plane I showed it to the pilot and he just kind of shrugged it off like it was no big deal. Anyway I hope both airlines can turn things around and get back on the right track.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are a match made in heaven, I can't stand either of them. I have flown on US airways quite a few times and I would say that 75% of the times there was always a delay of some sort and american airlines have some of the worst looking planes not to mention their maintenance record is poor. Hell, just last month I flew from atlanta to miami on american and after the plane had landed I just so happen to look outside at the wing and noticed that there was about a 10 to 12 inch section of the flaps that had broken off. Now I am not an aeronautical engineer but that can't be safe at all. I took a picture of it and as I was getting off the plane I showed it to the pilot and he just kind of shrugged it off like it was no big deal. Anyway I hope both airlines can turn things around and get back on the right track.

 

I would love to see said picture

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMAG0318_1.jpg

 

I would love to see said picture

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Here you go, I took this pic last month.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I avoid both of them like the plague. US Airways has more modern planes. American has the MD 80/88 fleet that's like a noose around their necks. They also have way too many other plane types, making maintenance difficult and mistake prone and expensive. I hope they get to modernize their fleet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Pilot was right, something that small will cause no impact to flight at all.

even so, there is no way that the rest of the flap where the piece came off is not at the least slightly damaged, making the possibility for other pieces to fail pretty likely. I would be flipping a nut if I saw that in my aircraft. Maybe that is just my paranoid engineer self, but still. I'm sure faa would love to see that pic.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pilot was right, something that small will cause no impact to flight at all.

 

Something that small? It may be small in relation to the over all size of the wing but that is still very significant. Also if they blatantly left it like that who knows what else is wrong with the plane? These things cruise at 550 mph, why take that kind of chance with peoples safety?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something that small? It may be small in relation to the over all size of the wing but that is still very significant. Also if they blatantly left it like that who knows what else is wrong with the plane? These things cruise at 550 mph, why take that kind of chance with peoples safety?

 

Yes, small. It is on the back edge of the wing where it has pretty much no wind resistance. Remember the planes that still flew with a huge chunk missing from the cabin? Planes can take more then you think they can. But yes, I would be concerned about this too though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I avoid both of them like the plague. US Airways has more modern planes. American has the MD 80/88 fleet that's like a noose around their necks. They also have way too many other plane types, making maintenance difficult and mistake prone and expensive. I hope they get to modernize their fleet.

 

Ah, yes...aviation. My second favorite subject beyond wireless. I love the DC-9/MD-80 series. The 2+3 seating is very convenient. However, these planes are really old and very inefficient. Time for something new.

 

The last I heard the Bombardier C series was a 2+3 seater. Bombardier is the maker of the CRJ and is expanding into the larger 100-130 seat class narrow body jet category.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMAG0318_1.jpg

 

 

 

Here you go, I took this pic last month.

 

Very cool. I work as a crash/rescue fire fighter at an airport, and am always eager to see stuff like this. Do you happen to know what type of plane it was? 737? Looks low enough to the ground to be a 73. I will keep my eyes open, see if i notice anything like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I avoid both of them like the plague. US Airways has more modern planes. American has the MD 80/88 fleet that's like a noose around their necks. They also have way too many other plane types, making maintenance difficult and mistake prone and expensive. I hope they get to modernize their fleet.

 

Not to mention pilots having to be trained/certified on different aircraft.

 

Southwest operates the Boeing 737 and that's it. Saves money all the way around. It will be interesting to see what they do going forward since the merger with Air Tran.

 

I'm lucky, Southwest has a big presence here in RI and offers direct flights to Fort Lauderdale (I winter in Hallandale a lot.) as well as Tampa and Vegas .

 

Jet Blue just started flying out of PVD and it's been great since they created fare wars between the two.

 

My last purchase was 140.00. R/T.

 

Sent from my EVO LTE using Tapatalk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very cool. I work as a crash/rescue fire fighter at an airport, and am always eager to see stuff like this. Do you happen to know what type of plane it was? 737? Looks low enough to the ground to be a 73. I will keep my eyes open, see if i notice anything like it.

 

Yeah, it was a 737. When I saw it I was like wtf? Maybe it wasn't that big of a deal to them but it definitely gives the wrong impression when a passenger looks outside and see a section of the wing missing. I love to fly, I probably fly 60k miles a year and this is the first time I have ever seen anything like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's possible that it got dinged up somehow and this was maintenance's answer to a quick repair. The edge looks too clean and rounded. There is concern about asymmetrical flap deployment, on a small aircraft, that might be of concern but on a larger, not so much.

 

I hate all airlines, but they are necessity of life for some. I spent about 4 years flying around the country for work (mostly up and down the east coast) Glad I only time I fly now is in my friend's Platus PC-12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention pilots having to be trained/certified on different aircraft.

 

Southwest operates the Boeing 737 and that's it. Saves money all the way around. It will be interesting to see what they do going forward since the merger with Air Tran.

 

I'm lucky, Southwest has a big presence here in RI and offers direct flights to Fort Lauderdale (I winter in Hallandale a lot.) as well as Tampa and Vegas .

 

Jet Blue just started flying out of PVD and it's been great since they created fare wars between the two.

 

My last purchase was 140.00. R/T.

 

Sent from my EVO LTE using Tapatalk.

 

AirTran only flies Boeing 737 and 717 and they will get rid of the 717s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

AirTran only flies Boeing 737 and 717 and they will get rid of the 717s.

There is no such aircraft as a Boeing 717. It starts like this 707, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, and finally 787 then you have the McDonnell Douglas Merger which brings into play MD-90's , MD-10's AND MD-11' s. AirTrans has MD-90's and 757's and then there are the smaller jets which are Embraer's. There are also some Airbus 319's also.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no such aircraft as a Boeing 717. It starts like this 707, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, and finally 787 then you have the McDonnell Douglas Merger which brings into play MD-90's , MD-10's AND MD-11' s. AirTrans has MD-90's and 757's and then there are the smaller jets which are Embraer's. There are also some Airbus 319's also.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

You might want to read this link:

 

http://www.airtran.com/aircraft/new_717_jets.aspx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might want to read this link:

 

http://www.airtran.c...w_717_jets.aspx

 

And if you go there, the only other aircraft listed is the 737-700

 

According to Wikipedia:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AirTran_Airways

 

Airtran only has 737 and 717s

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks more like a updated MD80. That did come out after the merger with MD.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

Yes it is but they did not make very many of them and the program was terminated soon after.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are phasing out our 727's, A300's , A310's, MD-10's amd MD-11's and replacing them with 757's and 767's and the 777's we have are being used for international routes.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are phasing out our 727's, A300's , A310's, MD-10's amd MD-11's and replacing them with 757's and 767's and the 777's we have are being used for international routes.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

Who is we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • The Kendall/Kerr/Gillespie PCS swap is a very nice win-win for AT&T and T-Mobile. Means both of them will have a 20x20 PCS channel, though in exchange T-Mobile goes from 10x10 to 5x5 on one of their spectrum blocks. I figure AT&T will start running n2 DSS on that channel, as they have enough customers in those areas to need the capacity, while T-Mobile will probably just run B2 LTE, as once Auction 108 finally clears they'll have plenty of n41 to play with. Guessing we'll see the non-G-block 5x5 slice running n25, but it would get aggregated with n71 rather than n41 I figure as n71 will remain 20x20 there until the STA goes away (and maybe after that, as if T-Mobile gets 700 MHz as the result of VZW buying West Central Wireless's spectrum there's no reason to run LTE in 600). Which makes me think that the next move is T-Mobile trading 700A for the 5x5 of orphaned PCS (E block) to VZW once the WCW transaction closes, as that would give VZW 20x20 PCS in the area, and would give T-Mobile 700 MHz in an area where they have none. Then VZW can either trade 700B to T-Mobile as well in exchange for the AWS I block in those areas (gives T-Mobile 10x10 B12, gives VZW 15x15 B66) or they can cut a deal with AT&T to give AT&T 10x10 B12 (AT&T has the lower C block), but I'm not sure what that deal would be if trading like for like (vs. AT&T handing VZW their upper tiny slice of B5, giving VZW 15x15 to play with in that band post-WCW-acquisition). EDIT: Just looked at AWS spectrum again, and if AT&T would rather have 10x10 B12 than 2x 10x10 AWS, they could swap AWS-D for VZW's 700B block. That would give VZW 20x20 AWS, and would take AT&T down to 10x10 + 5x5...which they'd likely be fine with as they have 20x20 PCS, small cells in the busy areas, and as a result of the transaction three 10x10 chunks of spectrum in the area below 1 GHz. And if VZW traded 700A to T-Mobile for PCS-E VZW would have 20x20 PCS as well. Which is quite useful in an area that's macro-only for VZW and likely not dense enough for proper mobile usage of CBRS or C-Band (and an area where VZW doesn't even run DSS now).
    • Yeah, $250 credit for an S22 is awful. tbf last year they didn't have solid upgrade credits until mid-late April, which is when I paid $225 to swap my S21 for an S22. Happy to wait 'til then for that kind of deal, though I'll be annoyed at battery life in the mean time.
    • Miserable upgrade credits from Samsung this year unless you want to rely on carrier financing. Sticking with S22U for a while. 
    • So far we've documented close to 100 Sprint conversions in NYC with permits still rolling in and that's only what we've identified manually. Tons of sites get converted/updated without permits so there's potentially a lot more that we haven't spotted yet. There are also dozens of sites that are still broadcasting the keep PLMN, some have been decommissioned but historically the vast majority have been converted.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...