Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Tucson/Yuma Market


jasper7821

Recommended Posts

Ok, I was just been told by Sprint that the tower next to my house between Broadway and 22 nd east of Houghton is an LTE tower but I cannot test it because I don't have an LTE phone yet, can anyone confirm?

 

It's not "an LTE tower" but it may have been upgraded to Network Vision equipment. No LTE will go live until upgraded backhaul is in place, no towers have upgraded backhaul yet in Tucson thanks to the vendors supplying it taking their time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope didn't reset my phone, I did try to update prl and profile...nada. I wasn't out there yesterday, could be the tower was just down. Although I was out by the Wal-Mart on 8e and 32nd, could only pull Evdo still

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope didn't reset my phone, I did try to update prl and profile...nada. I wasn't out there yesterday, could be the tower was just down. Although I was out by the Wal-Mart on 8e and 32nd, could only pull Evdo still

 

Kind of strange, but I've had that happened to me on my phone and after resetting radios, or power cycle the phone, I get Ehrpd back.

 

 

I will say though; yesterday was the first time in a very long time that 3G was working well during peak hours. It hovered around 2 -300 kbps down and about 700kbps up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea when Sprint will start the LTE in tucson? I remember I has been told around July 10th but this was not the case..

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

No one know exact dates. We are all hoping for soon.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea when Sprint will start the LTE in tucson? I remember I has been told around July 10th but this was not the case..

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

No one know exact dates. We are all hoping for soon.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

Exactly, if we knew when it was coming, this would be the first place to know!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I am not clear what NV means then, I just travelled to the Dallas FW area and this should be a good LTE/NV area, now I don't have an LTE phone to test yet but let me tell you, 3G sucks bad! Is this what NV is? Am i missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I am not clear what NV means then, I just travelled to the Dallas FW area and this should be a good LTE/NV area, now I don't have an LTE phone to test yet but let me tell you, 3G sucks bad! Is this what NV is? Am i missing something?

 

NV - Network Vision. Sprint is in the process of overhauling the entire network. LTE and 3G are two different steps. Likely what you were experiencing was the 3G upgrades that are not yet complete. Dallas is an Ericsson upgraded market, which means they went through and LTE first, and are just now going back and updating the 3G side of things. 

 

Additional updates for 800 1x and 800 LTE are coming soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work at the air station in yuma. Speeds suck until about midnight. During the day downloads go at about 20-30kbps at midnight 120-150

Down in the valley; by Ave B and 16th street, speeds have slightly getting better. We can consistanly download at about 200kbps and upload maintains at about 300kbps during peak hours. However, in the morning at this location, I can download at approx 1700kbps and upload at approx 800kbps to 1.2mbps.

 

We were in the teens for a while befor these speeds started showing up. Keep your head up. Things are getting better Very SLOW but they are getting better.

 

 

This is currently during peak hours

 

 

 

http://s42.photobucket.com/albums/e334/Hypeo/?action=view&current=2013-08-20_17-15-36.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work at the air station in yuma. Speeds suck until about midnight. During the day downloads go at about 20-30kbps at midnight 120-150

I agree for the past couple of weeks speeds at the air station have been garbage...Used to be decent, but not as of late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree for the past couple of weeks speeds at the air station have been garbage...Used to be decent, but not as of late.

 

Dang, just after I posted those speeds on my previous post, I start slowing down too.   currently pulling 20kbps.  :-(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope something good is happening soon, and by good i mean LTE. I work overnights and the speed is always about 1.6 Mbps but recently its gone down to about .70 to .80 Mbps, still not bad but lower. My phone has been constantly loosing eHRPD and connects at EV-DO since last week and it hasn't done this as frequently before.

 

Any day now.. any day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me most of the time sprints slow data doesn't bother me as I am not a "heavy" data user. However not sure if the fact I am not a heavy data user is due to sprints slow speeds.

 

Only time will tell, can't wait for lte

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so I got some good news, and I have some GREAT news.. Which one you guys want first???

Give us both. We can take it. ;)

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the good news is that I just saw a buddy of mine that I haven't seen since high school..  It was great

 

The Great news is that he works for Century Link and they were installing back haul to the tower at Ave B and 20th street.  He said they are starting to work on the toweres in town already..

 

They were connecting everything in the cabinet today and we just have to wait for Sprint to accept it..

 

 

:-)  Makes me a happy camper.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the good news is that I just saw a buddy of mine that I haven't seen since high school..  It was great

 

The Great news is that he works for Century Link and they were installing back haul to the tower at Ave B and 20th street.  He said they are starting to work on the toweres in town already..

 

They were connecting everything in the cabinet today and we just have to wait for Sprint to accept it..

 

 

:-)  Makes me a happy camper.

 

 

does this information extend to Tucson proper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

does this information extend to Tucson proper?

They work for Yuma sector. He didn't mention anything about Tucson.

 

Didn't stay to ask them many questions since I was running late for my fishing trip. I hope to see him again when I come back

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the good news is that I just saw a buddy of mine that I haven't seen since high school..  It was great

 

The Great news is that he works for Century Link and they were installing back haul to the tower at Ave B and 20th street.  He said they are starting to work on the toweres in town already..

 

They were connecting everything in the cabinet today and we just have to wait for Sprint to accept it..

 

 

:-)  Makes me a happy camper.

 

Another information source to develop! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope something good is happening soon, and by good i mean LTE. I work overnights and the speed is always about 1.6 Mbps but recently its gone down to about .70 to .80 Mbps, still not bad but lower. My phone has been constantly loosing eHRPD and connects at EV-DO since last week and it hasn't done this as frequently before.

 

Any day now.. any day.

 

Same thing has been happening to me in Rio Rico. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...