Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - East Michigan Market (Detroit/Flint/Ann Arbor/Tri-Cities)


ReyBanz

Recommended Posts

Here is the SCP capture of site in Fenton (PCI 241) with the second Band 41 carrier. Notice there are 2 LTE "neighbor cells" detected from PCI 241. Interesting considering we are in the IBEZ and I was considerably far away enough from the site that I do not believe the phone was detecting another sector.

Screenshot_2015-06-06-18-09-00.jpg

 

Engineering screen capture while connected to PCI 241 Sector 01 showing I am on the commonly found EARFCN 40978.

Screenshot_2015-06-06-18-08-54.png

 

This is what initially caught my attention. Sector 04 in a Samsung market?? Hmmm.....

Screenshot_2015-06-06-18-01-49.jpg

 

Engineering screen capture confirming a second Band 41 carrier from PCI 241.

Screenshot_2015-06-06-17-59-46.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the SCP capture of site in Fenton (PCI 241) with the second Band 41 carrier. Notice there are 2 LTE "neighbor cells" detected from PCI 241. Interesting considering we are in the IBEZ and I was considerably far away enough from the site that I do not believe the phone was detecting another sector.

attachicon.gif Screenshot_2015-06-06-18-09-00.jpg

 

Engineering screen capture while connected to PCI 241 Sector 01 showing I am on the commonly found EARFCN 40978.

attachicon.gif Screenshot_2015-06-06-18-08-54.png

 

This is what initially caught my attention. Sector 04 in a Samsung market?? Hmmm.....

attachicon.gif Screenshot_2015-06-06-18-01-49.jpg

 

Engineering screen capture confirming a second Band 41 carrier from PCI 241.

attachicon.gif Screenshot_2015-06-06-17-59-46.png

Second carriers have the same serving cells if from the same sector. 03/04/05 signifies second second and the 41176 earfcn is the center frequency for the 20 MHz block immediately adjacent to 40978.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the SCP capture of site in Fenton (PCI 241) with the second Band 41 carrier. Notice there are 2 LTE "neighbor cells" detected from PCI 241. Interesting considering we are in the IBEZ and I was considerably far away enough from the site that I do not believe the phone was detecting another sector.

 

This is what initially caught my attention. Sector 04 in a Samsung market?? Hmmm.....

attachicon.gifScreenshot_2015-06-06-18-01-49.jpg

 

Engineering screen capture confirming a second Band 41 carrier from PCI 241.

attachicon.gifScreenshot_2015-06-06-17-59-46.png

 

Are you on the latest SignalCheck version? You should be seeing a little "2" in the app indicating the second carrier.. it will show up for 04/05/06 sectors. Currently working on adding an indicator for Ericsson users who see 03 as a second carrier as well.

 

-Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you on the latest SignalCheck version? You should be seeing a little "2" in the app indicating the second carrier.. it will show up for 04/05/06 sectors. Currently working on adding an indicator for Ericsson users who see 03 as a second carrier as well.

 

-Mike

Running 4.28 and checked Google Play to verify no updates are available.

 

What you see is what you get with the screen shots. The only thing I altered was I blacked out site addresses.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you on the latest SignalCheck version? You should be seeing a little "2" in the app indicating the second carrier.. it will show up for 04/05/06 sectors. Currently working on adding an indicator for Ericsson users who see 03 as a second carrier as well.

 

-Mike

Are you sure your code is called while on band 41? Band 41 second carrier is not wide spread yet maybe the lack of an indicator has gone unnoticed. Looks like it was not working in florida nv2 sector "3B" also.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure your code is called while on band 41? Band 41 second carrier is not wide spread yet maybe the lack of an indicator has gone unnoticed. Looks like it was not working in florida nv2 sector "3B" also.

 

He's talking about 2nd PCS LTE carrier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First two are at Schoolcraft, Middlebelt, and Merriman.

uploadfromtaptalk1434175735483.pnguploadfromtaptalk1434175744239.png

The second two are at Newburgh and 5 Mile.uploadfromtaptalk1434175914072.pnguploadfromtaptalk1434175921934.png

Hopefully these upload correctly.

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does one tell whether they are on the second carrier or not? I know to check the EARFCN but I'm not sure what to look for.

Same tower different frequency. GCI sector gives a hint it maybe second carrier but you should check for a different frequency to make sure.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your profile shows you using a LG G3.I get to the engineering screens on my LG G2 and G Flex by dialing ##DEBUG#.

Does this help.

uploadfromtaptalk1434291189974.png

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does one tell whether they are on the second carrier or not? I know to check the EARFCN but I'm not sure what to look for.

A little detective work using a couple different tools. For example, I know that in my area of SE Mich that Band 41 is primarily on 40978 on Sectors 00, 01, and 02 (Samsung market). Now we're seeing Sectors 03, 04, and 05 popping up and checking the LTE Engineering screen is showing us that the "new" sectors are using 41176.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little detective work using a couple different tools. For example, I know that in my area of SE Mich that Band 41 is primarily on 40978 on Sectors 00, 01, and 02 (Samsung market). Now we're seeing Sectors 03, 04, and 05 popping up and checking the LTE Engineering screen is showing us that the "new" sectors are using 41176.

Thank you, now I know what to look for.

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...