Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands Market


Gab2012

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Dkoellerwx said:

Is the left hand antenna dual or tri-band? If dual, I didn't know those existed but that's neat. 

Dualband 1.9 + 2.5 with the right a quad port 750 MHz antenna. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to let you know .  Att is using three band ca 15 mhz in band 2 10 mhz in band 30 and 5 mhz in band 12, in some parts they use 10 mhz of band 4 .Claro  started using  3ca with two channels of  10 mhz in band 66 and 10 mhz in band 12 these days , they were just  10 mhz of band 4 until now.T mobile was using just 20 mhz in band 4 now with 5mhz in band 2 added and Sprint as you know  uses ca where they have band 41, 5 mhz in band 25 in most parts and band 13 Openmobile coverage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/20/2018 at 10:53 PM, Robert7 said:

Just to let you know .  Att is using three band ca 15 mhz in band 2 10 mhz in band 30 and 5 mhz in band 12, in some parts they use 10 mhz of band 4 .Claro  started using  3ca with two channels of  10 mhz in band 66 and 10 mhz in band 12 these days , they were just  10 mhz of band 4 until now.T mobile was using just 20 mhz in band 4 now with 5mhz in band 2 added and Sprint as you know  uses ca where they have band 41, 5 mhz in band 25 in most parts and band 13 Openmobile coverage

Is Claro running VoLTE or not yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
1 hour ago, nexgencpu said:

Looks like microwave for backhaul.

lol.  The other middle.  Perhaps LTE 750 (700 c 10x10 from the PRWireless PR, LLC deal, dba Open Mobile)  like Verizon -- 700 a used by T-Mobile elsewhere (different bands).  Sprint also has enough 800 for only 1x800.  References:   http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/licenseMap.jsp?licKey=3069548  http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/licenseMap.jsp?licKey=1935940

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dkyeager said:

lol.  The other middle.  Perhaps LTE 750 (700 c 10x10 from the PRWireless PR, LLC deal, dba Open Mobile)  like Verizon -- 700 a used by T-Mobile elsewhere (different bands).  Sprint also has enough 800 for only 1x800.  References:   http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/licenseMap.jsp?licKey=3069548  http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/licenseMap.jsp?licKey=1935940

Still technically correct!?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dkyeager said:

lol.  The other middle.  Perhaps LTE 750 (700 c 10x10 from the PRWireless PR, LLC deal, dba Open Mobile)  like Verizon -- 700 a used by T-Mobile elsewhere (different bands).  Sprint also has enough 800 for only 1x800.  References:   http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/licenseMap.jsp?licKey=3069548  http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/licenseMap.jsp?licKey=1935940

See posts above, it's for 750.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Dkoellerwx said:

See posts above, it's for 750.

You are correct about 750.  If caught earlier I would remove it since it is redundant.  It is a different photo as implied later.

I should have just gone to sleep. Before any of these last 24 hour posts. Apologies for being snarky to nextgencpu.

Edited by dkyeager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
21 minutes ago, Robert7 said:

Anybody knows if Sprint galaxy s9 or s9+ have b71..? because i went to a sprint store and checked it didnt

All variants of Galaxy devices are exactly the same, including all bands on all variants, so to answer your question, yes they all do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
    • Lots of time if you can get close to the pole, you will see a sticky label on the box that is low enough to read. Most of the time it warns of RF exposure but also it may have a toll free number to call if there is an issue. Sometimes there is a power company meter with the name of the user. I would be surprised if there was nothing there to help identify it.  Thinking further, if this is multi-Tenant oDAS, then maybe you might only see some name like Crown Castle or maybe even a department in the city government.   An app on your phone may show the carrier(s)
    • I found a multi-carrier oDAS node at the corner of Bushwick Ave & Cedar St. You can see an upgraded Verizon macro deployment behind the node, and T-Mobile has a fully upgraded site only a block away. So, the only thing that makes sense is that this is an AT&T node with LTE+mmWave (or maybe C-Band).
    • I tried going into a Boost Mobile store and they wouldn't sell me a rainbow SIM card, said that it would be dead as soon as I put it in the Moto Edge 2023... which I know is bs... 
    • They didn't do all 2.5 with the Sprint merger, so I'm not sure why they would do that for USCC in areas arguably more rural. But I'm 100% sure they'll swap out the gear. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...