Jump to content

My Coworkers Interesting call with AT&T


Recommended Posts

My coworker just received text from ATT they will be throtlling his account as he is above 3gb. He is obviously not happy and checked logs there was 500mb+ usuage at midnight which he has no clue how that happened. Anyways he wants to move his 4 lines to Sprint and ATT escalated the matter to supervisor. Here it gets interesting..supervisor told my coworker Read fine line at Sprint.."They also throttle after 5GB".

 

 

wow did not know ATT would resort to lying to keep customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I would be getting that Supervisor's name and escalating to at&t upper management, along with contacting dan at sprint dot com (Dan Hesse's office) and reporting what at&t is doing. While there is no corp policy to spread lies, this should be nipped in the bud ASAP.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I would be getting that Supervisor's name and escalating to at&t upper management, along with contacting dan at sprint dot com (Dan Hesse's office) and reporting what at&t is doing. While there is no corp policy to spread lies, this should be nipped in the bud ASAP.

 

 

He has contacted ATT and told them customer services supervisor lied. He is also planning on contacting Huffington post.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it were just a regular CS rep, I wouldn't be so shocked, but the fact that it was a supervisor is a little disturbing. Resorting to lying about your competitor in order to retain customers is absurd and you wonder how many times they've done this already.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Par for the course for AT&T. They don't have the best network now (Verizon does), they won't have the best network later (Sprint will) and they don't have the best pricing for a nationwide network (T-Mobile and Sprint do). They don't even have an exclusive on the iPhone or the iPad. It's a wonder they keep getting net adds.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I went to visit my closest tower a couple months ago some guys were there working on AT&T's equipment. Talked to them for a bit and they also said Sprint was one of the worst about throttling their customer's data speeds. In my head I knew better, but it seems to be a common lie for those associated with AT&T to spread.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently those techs (and others AT&T) are willing to confuse poor data performance (which Sprint does have issues with...but those are being fixed) with outright throttling by the provider (which CricKet and T-Mobile do after you hit their respective capped plans' caps).

 

Of course, this is another reason Sprint needs to get NV and band-aid fixes pushed through as quickly as possible, because 400 kbps is no way run run a modern cellular network (and 400 kbps is on the high end of what some people see these days).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

Of course, this is another reason Sprint needs to get NV and band-aid fixes pushed through as quickly as possible, because 400 kbps is no way run run a modern cellular network (and 400 kbps is on the high end of what some people see these days).

 

That's for sure... when I hit 400kbps I'm having a really good day. Typically 200kbps or less downloads and uploads rarely show over 100kbps. And my tower now shows it had a data speed upgrade in the past 6 months. I've been waiting for them to say it was finally done, but it hasn't really improved my speeds.

 

I did see 1Mbps down on a single speed test early one morning but that was short-lived and it was only once. Guess noone else was on then. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My coworker just received text from ATT they will be throtlling his account as he is above 3gb. He is obviously not happy and checked logs there was 500mb+ usuage at midnight which he has no clue how that happened. Anyways he wants to move his 4 lines to Sprint and ATT escalated the matter to supervisor. Here it gets interesting..supervisor told my coworker Read fine line at Sprint.."They also throttle after 5GB".

 

 

wow did not know ATT would resort to lying to keep customers.

 

http://shop2.sprint.com/en/stores/popups/4G_coverage_popup.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Sprint reserves the right to throttle but does not actually do it. I believe I saw an interview with Dan Hesse where he talked about this.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

yes I remember that and there was immediate followup from Sprint to clarify Hesse did not mean smartphones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I jumped to Sprint after ATT did this. Only they didn't "escalate" to a supervisor. After an annoying email thread, I replied that I'd rather jump in a pool filed with salt and razor blades before doing business with them again. They proceeded to call me after I had been with sprint for a month (hows that for customer service!) but I hung up. I didn't want to hear their stories. I'd advise everyone to do the same (avoid them).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has contacted ATT and told them customer services supervisor lied. He is also planning on contacting Huffington post.

 

Good luck with that. I worked at a call center.

 

Let me translate for you.

 

Cust: A rep/sup/manager lied to me, I want it reported to upper management! And have them call me back

Rep: I am so sorry to hear that and apologize for the miscommunication, I will definitely pass that along and someone will get back to you when it's resolved

Cust: Thank you so much, Im giving you a ten on a survey!

 

 

What actually happens:

 

Cust: A rep/sup/manager lied to me, I want it reported to upper management! And have them call me back

Rep: Yeah, lots of people here are uninformed idiots or lie to get good surveys. Im lieing to you right now because there is no mechanism in place to report any coworkers outside of serious issues like fraud. But if I tell you that, youll get angry at me. So I'll say Ill pass it along when in reality I'm enjoying this call because it is fast and reduces my handle time. No one will ever call you back and theres nothing you can do about it.

Cust: Thank you so much, Im giving you a ten on a survey!

 

 

 

AT&T is not the only major wireless company that has reps saying that Sprint throttles.

 

Neither AT&T or the other companies release memos saying "tell custs sprint throttles" but they Do tell their agents "make the cust happy about being with us and discourage changing providers, also, pass your survey or else"

 

Thats why theres so much lying going on when you call customer service. The agents number one priority is to make you think theyve resolved your issue. Solving it is secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep.. Exactly why we hear sprint reps telling customers network vision is updating their towers and it will be fixed soon. When in reality network vision won't start in that area for another year. Just smooth talking them to get them off the phone and the customer is now happy.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I jumped to Sprint after ATT did this. Only they didn't "escalate" to a supervisor. After an annoying email thread, I replied that I'd rather jump in a pool filed with salt and razor blades before doing business with them again. They proceeded to call me after I had been with sprint for a month (hows that for customer service!) but I hung up. I didn't want to hear their stories. I'd advise everyone to do the same (avoid them).

 

I think they call back anyone that cancels service. When I cancelled my U-Verse internet, I got a callback from them a month or so later asking why I left and what they could do to get me back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they call back anyone that cancels service. When I cancelled my U-Verse internet, I got a callback from then a month or so later asking why I left and what they could do to get me back.

 

Yeah I'd be inclined to agree with you, but the voicemail they left was in specific response to my complaint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just installed the update, and it's good!  As you recommended, I turned off both TA adjustments, and turned on displaying it when it's zero.  The value is basically spot-on.  It's bouncing between 18 and 19 for the Cameron Valley site, and it is in fact between 0.87 and 0.92 miles, as displayed in the app.  This is probably a better estimate of the TA values than any other device I own provides. As far as the -44 goes, I'll have to take it out and verify that it no longer records those cases. If this device didn't have that annoying reset problem, and got the Android 14 update (and in so doing supported TA on NR and continued to allow band locking), it would easily be the best device I own.  Easily.  And would be the device I standardize on for the 5G era.  I'll probably have to wait for a future device to come out with Android 14 and then see what happens. And I know I didn't have to, but I love SCP.  It is my primary tool for tracking the goings-on of the various networks and is very easy to use and work with across my 10 phones.  I am very happy to send a token of my appreciation your way now and then.  Thanks again! - Trip
    • Sorry, I misread your message -- yes, the app would show 0 if an invalid value was being reported. I don't think I had any MediaTek devices myself, but the beta testers have had a decent variety of devices over the years.   Sorry, I didn't word that very well in my last post -- I added an option to control display of LTE TA when it is 0. By default it will now be hidden (sadly a lot of devices do not show it) but anyone who wants to display it can adjust accordingly. There will be 3 user-selectable options related to LTE TA now -- the existing correction option, correction on LTE-TDD (which is independent/in addition to the existing correction option), and TA:0 display. In your case, I'd disable the TDD option and enable the TA:0 option; the defaults will be the opposite of what I think you need.   You did not have to do that, but I sincerely appreciate it, thank you! Beta update is rolling out now, let me know how it goes.
    • In order: This is very helpful to know.  Thanks. That makes a lot of sense, though it's showing me zero rather than nothing; it looks like if it's calculating a negative number, I'm seeing zero instead.  It makes me wonder how many devices you've tested against which use the MediaTek chipset.  This is only the second one I've used, and the first one was very, very old (didn't have B41), so it's possible that the MediaTek chip doesn't need the correction while others do.  Separately, I doubt that a real world case will ever see 1282, so I imagine any value above 1281 could be ignored. I would ask you to please not hide TA values of 0, or if you hide them by default, add an option to not hide them.  I am aware that, for example, the S22 doesn't report a valid TA value and always reports zero, but zero is a legitimate value and is useful to know when trying to identify sites. I'll look forward to your impending update, and I'm going to send along another donation if I can find the link.  Thanks so much, as always!  - Trip
    • I received the reports, thanks! You didn't catch it happening (it captures the diagnostics as soon as you hit send or long-click the connection banner on the main screen), and I had sent you an e-mail to clarify which value was -3.. but your screenshots confirmed my hunch that you meant RSRQ!   I know exactly what is happening here. Somewhere along the way, I learned that TD-LTE bands (33-53) needed a TA correction of -19 applied, and I confirmed it on several devices. Perhaps that is no longer universally true.. but what you're seeing SCP display matches that correction. Below 19 you see nothing, at 19 you see 0, and above that you see TA-19. The upper limit is 1282, which is why you see 1263. Your phone must report 1282 when the TA is unknown, which is not technically safe but I can work around that. Funny enough, I had a change to TA coming in the next update that had nothing to do with your issues.. TA:0 will be hidden moving forward, since several devices report 0 when it cannot be identified. I'll have an app update out shortly that addresses all of this, let me know how it works for you and thanks for the detailed feedback!
    • Mike, We ended up going out this morning to do errands in spite of the tropical storm.  I locked the phone on LTE B41, turned off the TA correction checkbox, and watched it carefully while out and about.  I have four screenshots for you. https://imgur.com/a/kCPTCnB First, I happened to get a screenshot of it doing the -44 dBm thing.  I also tried to send you at least one set of diagnostics showing the -44 dBm but I don't know where precisely in the process it collects the diagnostics.  Hopefully there's something useful in them. The rest of the screenshots are far more interesting.  All three were taken within seconds of each other in the CVS parking lot.  The phone's diagnostic screen shows a TA of 17, and oddly, the SCP diagnostics screenshot also appears to show a TA of 17.  But SCP's normal display is showing 0.  Not entirely sure what to make of that.  It looks like SCP won't show me a value other than 0 until I hit about 19 according to the phone diagnostic screen. It also appears that when SCP is showing a TA of 1263, that's the equivalent of a null value for the TA--no TA is calculated.  The phone diagnostic screen appears to show just "12" when that's happening; the SCP diagnostic screen shows 1282 in the TA section when that happens, a difference of 19, which is highly convenient given what I noted above about the TA value.  (I can't test that the phone diagnostic screen is limited to two characters and is thus truncating 1282 to just "12" as I suspect given where I am right now.  Had I known to be looking for it, I'd have tested in the middle of nowhere yesterday.) Anything catch your eye?  Anything I can do to help more?  - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...