Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Miami/West Palm Market


Mondays In Flames

Recommended Posts

Talk about Nokia showing up with their 8t8r, a record low ping Of 14 just WOW !! Anyone can feel free to to correct me if I'm wrong but I don't recap anything close to 14 being report in this forum.

Screenshot is on WiFi tho... Not sure if SRS.... [emoji52]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got to love B26. Inside Braman Honda in Lake Worth, never had an LTE signal unless you were within 10 feet from a door or wall. Now there's LTE even the middle of the building. Hopefully once full power, or optimization of the frequency, or whatever other reason there is for it being slower than what's supposed to be, it's finished or resolved, it should be awesome.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screenshot is on WiFi tho... Not sure if SRS.... [emoji52]

Again this is my home tower that phone connect everyday, i got my settings on Dropbox to upload pic on WiFi only and that's why it was on at the time I took the signal check screen shot.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/sc/3ads88u3fr0hurz/AABMX0Iv1uGZyZB8QRawsODza

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got to love B26. Inside Braman Honda in Lake Worth, never had an LTE signal unless you were within 10 feet from a door or wall. Now there's LTE even the middle of the building. Hopefully once full power, or optimization of the frequency, or whatever other reason there is for it being slower than what's supposed to be, it's finished or resolved, it should be awesome.

Im so excited that it's finally getting turned on down there. Next time I visit I should have service everywhere I go. Last time I was down there b41 and 25 did a pretty good job, but 26 wAs definitely needed. And now it's happening!

 

Yay. 8t8r and b26 activations everywhere. And we are only half way through the first month of the new year.

 

Oh. I forgot to say hi to Fabian since I know he likes to keep in touch with his favorite poster, and favorite wireless provider (sprint). :)

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 using Crapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Can someone explain to me how in the world is possible that I got those speeds, on b25, and horrible signal?

Sometimes with the best signal possible I don't even get 10mbps down on b25!

Clearly you are connected to b41, probably signal check fail to update but looking at it there is no way that could be b25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly you are connected to b41, probably signal check fail to update but looking at it there is no way that could be b25.

I was at that address for over an hour and it was b25 all the time. As soon as I left to another area, it immediately showed b41, ect...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at that address for over an hour and it was b25 all the time. As soon as I left to another area, it immediately showed b41, ect...

Usually the GCI is correct (despite it not displaying B41), most likely it was Sprint B41, and not Clear, definitely not B25.

 

Progress is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you saying there is a considerable difference in clear vs sprint B41 towers?

Right this moment the difference is minimal between Sprint Band 41 and Clear Band 41, they are both broadcasting similar technology. But that will change soon once Sprint enables another Carrier (20Mhzx2 instead of just 20Mhz) Basically Sprint equipment is superior, but currently there isn't much of a difference.

 

Now the difference between Band 25 vs Band 41!? its much bigger..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right this moment the difference is minimal between Sprint Band 41 and Clear Band 41, they are both broadcasting similar technology. But that will change soon once Sprint enables another Carrier (20Mhzx2 instead of just 20Mhz) Basically Sprint equipment is superior, but currently there isn't much of a difference.

 

Now the difference between Band 25 vs Band 41!? its much bigger..

Unless backhaul have not being upgraded on Clear b41, with Sprint b41 Backhaul has to be upgraded before the install 8tr8.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

bf39d7922e467903c0a62c4954db2a39.jpg

 

Can someone explain to me how in the world is possible that I got those speeds, on b25, and horrible signal?

Sometimes with the best signal possible I don't even get 10mbps down on b25!

 

 

I was at that address for over an hour and it was b25 all the time. As soon as I left to another area, it immediately showed b41, ect...

Your Signal Check screenshot GCI indicates you are on Sprint B41. You NEED to update SCP, it would have shown LTE 2500 if you were running the updated version.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the center of Downtown Miami. I've caught B26 here at my job. Inside my building I get ZERO reception, not even roaming. Att has 3 bars LTE. Why won't I get LTE inside, now with B26???

Does the nearest Sprint site have B26 live yet? And if it does, I can almost guarantee you it has not been optimized, yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No screen shot, also only one device supports CA (note4)

The Sprint Note 4 does not support Carrier Aggregation. However, the Sprint Note Edge does support 2xCA on Band 41.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's live because I've seen my phone land on it before, but only on my lunch break outside the building.

Well, you are saying that you are connecting to Band 26 outside, but do you know which Band 26 site? It could be a farther one away and not the nearest one at all.

 

And since no Band 26 is optimized in South Florida yet, it doesn't matter much. They fire up B26 at reduced power to minimize interference between sites. Then they go back afterward and increase broadcast power levels and fully optimize the site to correctly overlap adjacent sites.

 

So in your instance you can expect further B26 improvement. Definitely when B26 optimization occurs, and possibly also when a closer site goes live if you aren't currently connecting to the closest site. But it will not reach inside every building in every instance. No provider can guarantee that.

 

Where you currently receive B26, its strength and its speed is not as good as it is going to get. It's going to get much better all around South Florida. And beyond.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you are saying that you are connecting to Band 26 outside, but do you know which Band 26 site? It could be a farther one away and not the nearest one at all.

 

And since no Band 26 is optimized in South Florida yet, it doesn't matter much. They fire up B26 at reduced power to minimize interference between sites. Then they go back afterward and increase broadcast power levels and fully optimize the site to correctly overlap adjacent sites.

 

So in your instance you can expect further B26 improvement. Definitely when B26 optimization occurs, and possibly also when a closer site goes live if you aren't currently connecting to the closest site. But it will not reach inside every building in every instance. No provider can guarantee that.

 

Where you currently receive B26, its strength and its speed is not as good as it is going to get. It's going to get much better all around South Florida. And beyond.

This helps, Thx! I just don't know why launch a frequency without optimization...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This helps, Thx! I just don't know why launch a frequency without optimization...

 

Even at low power it is providing extra capacity. The other option would be to block access and wait until all the sites are live, then optimize, then allow access.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys i took some screenshots of my phone being on band 26 and the location is inside dolphins mall I'm here right now sitting at the eating tables next to the arcade section killing time since our movie won't start till 11:45pm well here's the screenshot and a speed test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...