Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Las Vegas Market


Timbax

Recommended Posts

Got some LTE 26 love while visiting my friends room on the 8th floor at excalibur this weekend. Whenever using the web it would roll back to B25 and B41. Its getting there. Ill upload a screenshot in a few.Screenshot_20160903-231405.png

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Visiting Vegas this week. Notice B26 appearing few times compared to last time.

Also notice the ping is very high on B41. I don't normally see ping over 100.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

I also noticed the same on Band 41 in Minnesota yesterday. Consistent pings above 105. Maybe it's related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's my home market. I don't see ping above 100 on B41

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

3eb616c4bd71fd69066c7d737de489e8.jpg

 

2nd-4th results are Band 41 3rd carrier from yesterday. But that's not normal, and could really just be the test server. But, I've never had that high pings with any server before.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still lots of improvement needed in Vegas when it comes to the casinos. Where a lot of people walk through.

Last trip I had friends with AT&T and T-mobile where they got LTE and I'm sitting on 3G.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still lots of improvement needed in Vegas when it comes to the casinos. Where a lot of people walk through.

Last trip I had friends with AT&T and T-mobile where they got LTE and I'm sitting on 3G.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

They just started rolling out band 26 last month. I'm sure in about 4-6 months our phones will never see 3G again in that market

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They just started rolling out band 26 last month. I'm sure in about 4-6 months our phones will never see 3G again in that market

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I so doubt that. These casinos need a DAS.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I so doubt that. These casinos need a DAS.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

 

Perhaps. But some already do. I'm sure next summer it'll be a much better experience. Vegas is already is solid market for S

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I so doubt that. These casinos need a DAS.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Perhaps. But some already do. I'm sure next summer it'll be a much better experience. Vegas is already is solid market for S

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Many already do have a DAS. Some of them are still 3G though.

 

Sent from my LG G5

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many already do have a DAS. Some of them are still 3G though.

 

Sent from my LG G5

True. All the casinos I have walked through get 3G. I don't think I have seen LTE in any casinos I have stepped in.

Now LTE outside and in the conventions centers.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet...Make sure you map it on Sensorly when you start seeing it live

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If I can remember to bring my LG G Pad, I definitely will!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now just remember, I'm still 5 miles from the serving tower, and so for a signal of -115, speeds are expected at the Speedtest posted.

 

3ebaf7697b4c29e90caaee2b7b036cb3.png

 

dd4f64079b2532896999896a9a87a8f7.png

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now just remember, I'm still 5 miles from the serving tower, and so for a signal of -115, speeds are expected at the Speedtest posted.3ebaf7697b4c29e90caaee2b7b036cb3.pngdd4f64079b2532896999896a9a87a8f7.png

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

crazy, is that antenna amount correct? Or is it the typical iOS field test screen fail?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

crazy, is that antenna amount correct? Or is it the typical iOS field test screen fail?

You mean the 4tx antennas? I'm not sure. I hope it's correct, but who knows. If there is a way to tell on the debug screen on my LG G Pad I will look it up and see.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now just remember, I'm still 5 miles from the serving tower, and so for a signal of -115, speeds are expected at the Speedtest posted.

You are lucky to even get anything at 5 miles on band 25.   Flat land helps you.   But a receive level of -115 to -119 is not good. Just barely usable.   Hope you get band 26 soon.  Band 26 will be much better, but many at places it gets congested and speeds are not good.    Is this site your only site or will you have a better one nearer your location?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are lucky to even get anything at 5 miles on band 25. Flat land helps you. But a receive level of -115 to -119 is not good. Just barely usable. Hope you get band 26 soon. Band 26 will be much better, but many at places it gets congested and speeds are not good. Is this site your only site or will you have a better one nearer your location?

This is my only location on this side of Pahrump. And this is in testing. So hopefully they turn up the power since they only have 2 sites covering the whole valley, but yes, once they launch B26, it'll help. As of yesterday, B26 is still not scheduled.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...