Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Kansas Market (including KC, Topeka, Wichita, St. Joseph)


Rickie546

Recommended Posts

Hey there! I'm near the K7 & Prairie Star Parkway aka 95th Street and I am not seeing the B41 yet but I have noticed my B25 signal went from full bars to about 50% and sometimes almost no bars. I am getting a 04D GCI off of Signalcheck app. Let me know and I can help you get some readings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey there! I'm near the K7 & Prairie Star Parkway aka 95th Street and I am not seeing the B41 yet but I have noticed my B25 signal went from full bars to about 50% and sometimes almost no bars. I am getting a 04D GCI off of Signalcheck app. Let me know and I can help you get some readings.

 

04D would indicate 8T8R B41, take this over to http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/5585-kansas-nv-20-map-and-spreadsheet/page-6 (premier thread) and we can do some more investigating! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint said they got 1 site done. Is Nokia keeping them from turning it on? It's pretty much right in the middle of the city.

Nokia does not have the equipment for sprint. What equipment they produce and ship over is going to the highest priority sites.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotcha, thanks, is that the same issue for the Western Iowa market then?

No. Samsung is going full steam.

 

Nokia and Alcatel-Lucent are affected the most by equipment shortages. Nokia is the worst affected if the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is backhaul the hold up for deploying band 41 in Wichita? If not what could be the hold up? Sprint is saying it's going to be another 3-6 months before it gets there.

 

Not 3-6 months. Sites are already being installed. However it will be a slow process, in part due to the shortages Tim mentioned. However, we already know of at least 2 sites that are installed. More are scheduled to be installed shortly. 

 

Now, it may take 3-6 months for them to officially announce Wichita as a Spark market, but that doesn't mean you won't see any B41 at all. You should be seeing it very soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So I was down at the arvest bank theater last night/this morning for a concert and Sprint held up to the ~5k people inside pretty well. Videos wouldn't upload, but pictures would. Basically anything that needed downlink worked though and as soon as I hit the street again everything had sent/uploaded before I could get mg phone out of my pocket to make a call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well this makes me very happy! Just happened to open LTE discovery and found this. Can't wait for this to hit the rest of Wichita.

Let us know if you find any more sites online!

 

Wasn't I just telling someone a couple weeks ago Spark wasn't that far off for Wichita...? Hm.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2f2b1790fdcee8b1aa7c5736baca495e.jpg

 

This wasn't online a month or so ago, so I'm assuming its new. Fills in a nice gap where I used to have trouble keeping a very fringe b25 signal or crappy 3g. Also this just popped up as I was typing this. Haven't seen b26 out here either yet. 10c73c2470112db3823ea59036568505.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For HD voice, are you guys seeing both 1900 and 800 being used? In doors here is what I get, and the voice quality isn't that good. Wonder if trying to switch to 800 would give better sound quality / reception on the nexus 5?

post-13073-0-92605400-1419098977_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

For HD voice, are you guys seeing both 1900 and 800 being used? In doors here is what I get, and the voice quality isn't that good. Wonder if trying to switch to 800 would give better sound quality / reception on the nexus 5?

 

HD voice is deployed on both 1900 and 800. However, it is very dependant on the connection you have, and who you are calling. The problem may not be on your end, it's hard to tell.

 

Picking up some band 41 in Wichita. Saw a whopping 9 down a few times. Easy sprint. What's the easiest way to report dead spots and does it make a difference?

 

The Sprint zone app allows you to report issues. You can also call support and try to get a ticket opened. Sometimes it helps, sometimes it doesn't. Often depends on who you get on the support call.

 

9 down isn't terrible. It will get better as more sites are online. Only 5 or 6 are broadcasting at this point, which are likely swamped by the number of Spark devices in range. What device do you have? Your profile still says EVO LTE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah not bad but I ran a speed test on my T-Mobile nexus 7 waiting at sonic and got 60 down while my sprint phone had no LTE. So thats what i have to compare it to. I just want them to be able to compete. I have an LG G2.

 

30-50 down was common earlier this week in Kansas City, which has more Spark sites online than Wichita, so it will get there. Just will take a little more time. Nokia has ramped up equipment production, so the shortage that we were dealing with last year shouldn't be a problem anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah not bad but I ran a speed test on my T-Mobile nexus 7 waiting at sonic and got 60 down while my sprint phone had no LTE. So thats what i have to compare it to. I just want them to be able to compete. I have an LG G2.

 

This was near the Speedway on Tuesday.

2015-01-07%2003.17.19.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah not bad but I ran a speed test on my T-Mobile nexus 7 waiting at sonic and got 60 down while my sprint phone had no LTE. So thats what i have to compare it to. I just want them to be able to compete. I have an LG G2.

 

The same entity that deployed T-mobiles fearsome and well engineered network in your region and across many regions in the US is now ramping up production for Sprint with deployment now being accelerated as component shortages are not an issue anymore. 

 

If you need the 60 mbps speed tests right now then by all means t-mobile is the one for you and no one would fault you as Sprint is playing catch up network wise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...