Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

I've seen the second carrier quite frequently, but not the B26, I guess I'll pay more attention to signal check and dump the log again to double check :)

 

Well now that i paid more attention, yes I see B26 popping up every now and then here in metro chicago area, but a bit different than compared to when i was in austin texas where I was almost exclusively on B26, the rest of the time I'm more llkely to be on B41.

 

In Chicago, I'm still mostly on B25 (original or USCC channel), only occasionaly do I see B26, and B41 services are still spotty in area I frequents

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If band 26 was a person, I'd give her a hug, and a small pat on the rear. I'm in a supply room at my fiance's work in Oakbrook. 4 cinder block walls where she used to get Sprint 1x/Verizon roaming data. Now it's -108dBm b26 with 8mbps speeds. :)

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was the network able to handle the Pride parade?

I think the news said over a million people were there. It's doubtful any cellular network was functioning during the parade.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If band 26 was a person, I'd give her a hug, and a small pat on the rear. I'm in a supply room at my fiance's work in Oakbrook. 4 cinder block walls where she used to get Sprint 1x/Verizon roaming data. Now it's -108dBm b26 with 8mbps speeds. :)

Now do the same using the test drive promotion #magenta and see what happens. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If band 26 was a person, I'd give her a hug, and a small pat on the rear.

 

Uh, band 26 is a man, and you just patted him on the butt.  Deal with it.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now do the same using the test drive promotion #magenta and see what happens. :D

 

I love to see people's reaction to the Test Drive promotion. A fairly large number of people I've seen online said that when they were on 4G it was fast, but they lose it too easily, or they're on 2G way to much for their liking. This is probably wrong for me to say but, I was kinda glad people were taking shots at T-Mobile's network for once. T-Mobile loves to act like their network is so perfect but in reality it has more weak point than others.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you know? Was b26 in the gym locker room with you?

 

Everyone knows band 26 has an e-penis.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

B41=e-Porn star!

 

Band 26 is short but thick, while band 41 is Long Dong Silver.

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure Vince regretting slappin that B26 butt now, unless he doesn't, that's fine too...LOL!

Nah, I'm marrying a lady, but I'm cool with it. It's like a football kind of butt smack. "Good signal penetration out there today, bro."
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love to see people's reaction to the Test Drive promotion. A fairly large number of people I've seen online said that when they were on 4G it was fast, but they lose it too easily, or they're on 2G way to much for their liking. This is probably wrong for me to say but, I was kinda glad people were taking shots at T-Mobile's network for once. T-Mobile loves to act like their network is so perfect but in reality it has more weak point than others.

I'm tempted to try it out for a week. I would rather wait until b26 is completely deployed here though.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm tempted to try it out for a week. I would rather wait until b26 is completely deployed here though.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's AWS spectrum LTE, It might have a wider pipe, I believe its 10x10 in Chicago, so speeds should be great, even during peak times, but its signal propagation characteristics are probably quite similar to the B25 we have now.  I'm sure LTE drops off just as much if not more than our B25 in the same profiles; basements, building interiors, parking garages, elevators, subway stations, old crappy brick/cinder buildings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile does have a lot better spacing in some parts of Chicago though. The University of Chicago campus and most of Hyde Park is an absolute deadzone for LTE (and 3G sometimes too, hopefully it will get better with optimized B26) but T-Mobile has smaller sites on campus and in the area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's AWS spectrum LTE, It might have a wider pipe...

 

T-Mobile has a wide pipe?  I thought that it would be a long pipe.  Okay, this penis metaphor is getting confusing...

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's one thing that agitates me about all this... Sprint is still 4th in the latest RootMetrics measurements in Chicago for call reliability. 

 

http://www.streetinsider.com/Press+Releases/RootMetrics+Report%3A+T-Mobile,+Verizon+Share+Recognition+as+Best+Overall+Carriers+in+Chicago/9585816.html

 

I throw my hands up at this. I thought CDMA 1X Advanced would have jetted Sprint to the top of the metrics here. It hasn't. 

 

I've racked my brain trying to come up with an explanation. I can't. 

 

 

Making calls in Chicago should be a smooth experience on any of the four networks. Verizon and AT&T led the pack and shared the Call RootScore Award with scores of 99.5 and 99.3, respectively. T-Mobile ranked third with a score of 98.9, and Sprint ranked fourth at 94.7.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...