Jump to content

HTC 10 Rumor Thread (Was HTC One M10 Rumor Thread)


Overstew

Recommended Posts

So they got rid of having the front facing speaker on the bottom. Dumb, I mean if they had decided to increase the screen real estate you could make the argument... but they put a big physical button there so you don't gain any space. But you still need virtual buttons for back and menu.... Makes no sense. Plus it looks basically indistinguishable from a Samsung phone in front.

 

And the headphone jack gets moved to the bottom... Maybe I'll just buy an M9 on clearance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they got rid of having the front facing speaker on the bottom. Dumb, I mean if they had decided to increase the screen real estate you could make the argument... but they put a big physical button there so you don't gain any space. But you still need virtual buttons for back and menu.... Makes no sense. Plus it looks basically indistinguishable from a Samsung phone in front.

 

And the headphone jack gets moved to the bottom... Maybe I'll just buy an M9 on clearance.

 

I believe there are capacitive buttons on either side of the fingerprint scanner for back and apps/menu. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like everything except the front of the device.  Looks way too much like Samsung.

 

That may be the intent.  Most consumers are woefully uninformed.  Sell them the Samsung Galaxy HTC One M10.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll just drop what I said on ars:

 

 

I think they might finally have a winner. I can't find any hardware specs to complain about and the software experience is probably gonna be the best they've ever offered (obviously far ahead of Samsung, but they pretty much already were).

With their past launches, there was always either at least one big spec shortcoming, and if not it was some software goof. I just hope it's not too late. I honestly think this device has more mainstream appeal (re: appearance, practicality, etc) than an S7, but I question HTC's ability to get that point across to the mainstream itself.

 

My parents will probably be picking these up for their upgrades in the Fall regardless. (I've invested so much time into teaching them Sense that it's really too late to get them anything else.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm due for an upgrade this summer.  I have been considering the LG G5 but seeing what I've seen of this device online this morning... I have to admit it's very tempting.  I wonder if it has FM radio.  Haven't seen that listed anywhere, but it usually isn't something advertised up front.  (The G5 has it, I think.)

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was checking out this page, but dont see the Sprint bands listed in the US model.  Anyone know why that is?  http://www.htc.com/us/smartphones/htc-10/

 

  • #WL SKU(America)
  • 2G/2.5G - GSM/GPRS/EDGE
  • 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
  • CDMA: 800/1900 with EVDO Rev A
  • 3G UMTS
  • 850/AWS/900/1900/2100 MHz
  • 4G LTE (up to 450Mbps)
  • FDD: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 29, 30
  • Support Cat 9 LTE, download up to 450 Mbps, upload up to 50 Mbps

 

The Japan model has band 26 and 41 though.

  • #UHL SKU(Japan)
  • 2G/2.5G - GSM/GPRS/EDGE
  • 800/850/1800/1900 MHz
  • 3G UMTS
  • 850/900/1900/2100 MHz
  • 4G LTE (up to 450Mbps)
  • FDD: Bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 13, 17, 19, 21, 26
  • TDD: Bands 38, 41
  • Support Cat 9 LTE, download up to 450 Mbps, upload up to 50 Mbps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the specs, but how good is the radio on this.

Do we have any numbers on it yet?

 

Sent from my HTC One M9

Don't worry about the numbers, from what I have heard, its by far the best rf performing htc device on sprint thus far.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I was checking out this page, but dont see the Sprint bands listed in the US model.  Anyone know why that is?  http://www.htc.com/us/smartphones/htc-10/

 

  • #WL SKU(America)
  • 2G/2.5G - GSM/GPRS/EDGE
  • 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
  • CDMA: 800/1900 with EVDO Rev A
  • 3G UMTS
  • 850/AWS/900/1900/2100 MHz
  • 4G LTE (up to 450Mbps)
  • FDD: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 29, 30
  • Support Cat 9 LTE, download up to 450 Mbps, upload up to 50 Mbps

 

The Japan model has band 26 and 41 though.

  • #UHL SKU(Japan)
  • 2G/2.5G - GSM/GPRS/EDGE
  • 800/850/1800/1900 MHz
  • 3G UMTS
  • 850/900/1900/2100 MHz
  • 4G LTE (up to 450Mbps)
  • FDD: Bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 13, 17, 19, 21, 26
  • TDD: Bands 38, 41
  • Support Cat 9 LTE, download up to 450 Mbps, upload up to 50 Mbps

 

If the Japanese version has the specs Sprint needs I don't think it will be a problem for Sprint to get HTC to make a version that works for them (possibly Japanese frequency support and american software, or some sort of blend like that). Between Brightstar and Softbank Sprint has the buying power and logistics to get that done. And they'll be able to distribute that to their CCA / RRRP partners as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry about the numbers, from what I have heard, its by far the best rf performing htc device on sprint thus far.

 

I am curious where it will compare to the S7.  I was a Evo, then S3, then M8 guy.  So really, my next phone is going to come down to RF performance and CA abilities.  If they are nearly identical, I will probably go HTC and stop my flip flop pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HTC has plenty of talk about how wonderfult the audio is on this device, yet they are not listing the model information on the amps and DACs, unlike how Vivo does for their smartphones. This worries me, as I want to know what exactly they are using. I'm almost wondering if it might be better just to get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge on the Samsung Forever plan on Sprint, then order the Oppo DAC/Amp unit to connect to it.

 

I'm also not happy about the weak waterproof rating on the HTC 10, along with not coming out with the specifications for the Sprint version, unless what they are listing is the Sprint version, which in that case no band 41. That would be beyond just awful, though I can't see how they could do this really. To release a product though with so many questions left unanswered is quite bad, and sad. If HTC were to answer these issues though, then I could see buying this device. However, with a waterproof case, which really is a must for me to get on a non-waterproof device.

 

Oh, one more thing, there is no word yet on which Apt-X this is using.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am curious where it will compare to the S7. I was a Evo, then S3, then M8 guy. So really, my next phone is going to come down to RF performance and CA abilities. If they are nearly identical, I will probably go HTC and stop my flip flop pattern.

So far, rf performance seems to be really good on the s7/s7 edge for sprint and the 10 for sprint appears to be very comparable to that.........according to my peeps. So trust me when when I say that htc fans should be pretty happy with the 10 this time around. I won't buy one on release but I will wait a month or two and get one at a lower price.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they got rid of having the front facing speaker on the bottom. Dumb, I mean if they had decided to increase the screen real estate you could make the argument... but they put a big physical button there so you don't gain any space. But you still need virtual buttons for back and menu.... Makes no sense. Plus it looks basically indistinguishable from a Samsung phone in front.

 

And the headphone jack gets moved to the bottom... Maybe I'll just buy an M9 on clearance.

 

The headset jack is on the top, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HTC has plenty of talk about how wonderfult the audio is on this device, yet they are not listing the model information on the amps and DACs, unlike how Vivo does for their smartphones. This worries me, as I want to know what exactly they are using. I'm almost wondering if it might be better just to get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge on the Samsung Forever plan on Sprint, then order the Oppo DAC/Amp unit to connect to it.

 

I'm also not happy about the weak waterproof rating on the HTC 10, along with not coming out with the specifications for the Sprint version, unless what they are listing is the Sprint version, which in that case no band 41. That would be beyond just awful, though I can't see how they could do this really. To release a product though with so many questions left unanswered is quite bad, and sad. If HTC were to answer these issues though, then I could see buying this device. However, with a waterproof case, which really is a must for me to get on a non-waterproof device.

 

Oh, one more thing, there is no word yet on which Apt-X this is using.

 

That would make zero sense not to include B41 CA.

 

As far as the chipset information for the DAC and such, we'll have to wait for a breakdown from iFixit or something similar. 

 

This is my new phone, day one purchase. 

 

Goodbye Galaxy S6.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HTC has plenty of talk about how wonderfult the audio is on this device, yet they are not listing the model information on the amps and DACs

 

 

Has HTC ever listed that information? All I know is that whatever is in there will absolutely be an upgrade over my S7 Edge. The output power is so much lower than I was used to with my M9. I used to take audio for granted on my phones cuz I've always had HTC but I've learned my lesson. And don't get me started on the difference in fluidity and responsiveness of the UI in general. That has left me a bit disappointed since switching to the S7 from having an M7, M8 and M9 for the past 3 years. I miss HTC's super smooth UI.

 

Also I highly doubt they would exclude Band 41 on the Sprint version when it's such a focal point in Sprint's LTE connectivity. Sprint will undoubtedly demand that it be on there so I wouldn't worry about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has HTC ever listed that information? All I know is that whatever is in there will absolutely be an upgrade over my S7 Edge. The output power is so much lower than I was used to with my M9. I used to take audio for granted on my phones cuz I've always had HTC but I've learned my lesson. And don't get me started on the difference in fluidity and responsiveness of the UI in general. That has left me a bit disappointed since switching to the S7 from having an M7, M8 and M9 for the past 3 years. I miss HTC's super smooth UI.

 

Also I highly doubt they would exclude Band 41 on the Sprint version when it's such a focal point in Sprint's LTE connectivity. Sprint will undoubtedly demand that it be on there so I wouldn't worry about that.

 

I've been very interested in this device as my primary go-to device if I switch to Sprint. Although admittedly, while it still is a fine device for GSM, there are other international devices that are better than the HTC 10 for GSM. Some of those devices, such as the Vivo Xplay 5 Elite which right now is the best device technically available, list the model information for both the DACs and amps used in it. Literally, the Vivo is an audiophile's dream device, which the HTC 10 might be coming close to.

 

On the introductory video posted on YouTube (its also on another thread here on S4GRU, though I'll make a post of it here in this thread, for reference) many people in the comments section on the video are asking for model information of the DACs and amps. It is important information for audiophiles, as there are differences between the vendors supplying them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...