Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 5 User Thread


COZisBack

Recommended Posts

Note5_01.png

Model Name: Samsung Galaxy Note 5

Model Number: SM-N920P

Processor: 2.7 GHz Quad-core Processor

Display: Quad HD+ Super AMOLED

  • 5.7 inches Quad HD+ Super AMOLED / 2560 x (1400+160)

Cellular Bands:
LTE

  • Band 2 (PCS A-F)
  • Band 4 (AWS)
  • Band 5 (CLR 850)
  • Band 12 (Lower 700 A-C)
  • Band 25 (PCS A-G)
  • Band 26 (ESMR 800 + CLR 850)
  • Band 41 (BRS/EBS 2600)

CDMA:

  • Band Class 0
  • Band Class 1
  • Band Class 10

GSM/W-CDMA:

  • GSM 850/1900
  • W-CDMA Bands 2/5

Wireless:

  • 802.11a/b/g/n Wi-Fi
  • Bluetooth 4.1 wireless technology
  • NFC

Notes:

  • Sprint Spark
  • Sprint Direct Connect Now
  • HD Voice
  • Wi-Fi Calling
  • Band 41 Carrier Aggregation certified
  • Fully CCA/RRPP Compliant
  • Currently no Sprint VoLTE capabilities
  • No SVLTE (Spark devices don't support SVLTE)

Link to Wall article.

Link to Rumor thread.

FCC Source: A3LSMG920P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Battery seems to be good. I'm at 6h 27m on battery with 4h 20m of SOT and my battery is at 40%. AC WiFi is pretty good in my house as well. N is good, but I don't have to drop down to N unless I'm out in my driveway.

 

I mentioned this in the rumor thread, but I haven't had any signal issues, either. Out and about yesterday it was updating Samsung apps and syncing my Moto 360 apps, and that caused some issues. It was in a part of town that's generally overloaded, however, and once the watch was done doing its thing everything was a-ok.

Edited by afazel
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just received the Note 5. Since I won't have LTE coverage until Thanksgiving break, I can't really post an LTE comparison between the device and the One Max, among the other phones I own (Unless GMOs suddenly get converted in PA). However, I have found a peculiar setting in the roaming options. Here it is. I apologize if its been discussed already. 

 

pEuCaFK.jpg?1

 

Has CCA roaming been enabled from GSM partners? Or is it just part of the Samsung software?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stopped by Best Buy last night to pick up something my Wife wanted and made a side trip to the samsung experience kiosk to try out the Note 5 and Edge+..... Hand feel wise I still prefer to Note 5 over the Edge+ which matches my expereince comparing the S6 vs the S6 Edge.  The Edge just feel too sharp on the metal body edge on either side of the phone making it less comfortable to hold.  Mobile radio was disabled and I didn't see a menu under setting to enable them so I couldn't even compare signal strength

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://phandroid.com/2015/08/20/samsung-galaxy-note-5-active-rumor/

 

Note 5 Active coming?  Might be an AT&T only phone though like the S6 Active.

 

That's there's still phones with exclusivity in 2015 is a pain in the arse. 

 

I realize you can buy upfront an unlocked version and put it on T-Mobile with B12 support, but still. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said that I wouldn't get the Note 5 because of the lack of sd card and removable battery. But I have to admit I am a sucker for new devices. I don't know. I think I'll wait for the LG Pro or whatever is coming with a stylus and see how it compares.

 

TS

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said that I wouldn't get the Note 5 because of the lack of sd card and removable battery. But I have to admit I am a sucker for new devices. I don't know. I think I'll wait for the LG Pro or whatever is coming with a stylus and see how it compares.

 

TS

It may be the most impressive Samsung device I've seen yet. I really like the Note 5 design. I just wish they offered it in Gold Platinum in the US. I see the band classes on this dual SIM Note5 and I think it's a beast. Too bad CDMA is owned by Qualcomm.

 

http://www.expansys-usa.com/samsung-galaxy-note5-n9200-dual-sim-unlocked-lte-32gb-gold-platinum-281821/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After looking at it at Best Buy here, it seems like a very solid, yet flawed phone. I loved the display and build quality. The camera opened amazingly fast. I was surprised to see them (BB) selling T-Mobile in Eastern Iowa. The poor RF performance on the wall post makes me nervous on getting the phone since I frequent areas with gaps in LTE coverage. The computing power compared to my G2 was impressive though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I decided to get a Note 5 today. So far around town LTE performance was very good. I didn't have SignalCheck installed yet due to two factor authentication (and me forgetting the backup passes), but latency and download/upload seemed much better than my G2. Camera pulls up (ready to use) incredibly fast. The fingerprint scanner works quick every time for me  At home my closest tower does not have LTE broadcasting at all, and I was able to connect to B26 on a more distant tower which my G2 would never hold on to. So far I'm very happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I'm going on over 24hrs on first full battery charge and so I'm impressed all ready compared to the g4. This phone does run smoother than the G4. But my biggest thing is battery life. rf performance so far seems to be on par with the G4,but then again i have only used this for a day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have had the 64 GB since Friday and one thing I have noticed continually......the Note 5 is almost constantly on Band 41 where as my Note 4 would bounce between 25 and 26 and once in a while show it to be on Band 41. I am even picking up band 41 all over southern NH in the Salem to Manchester area (I live in MA on the border), whereas I never saw that with the note 4.

 

Also, since my hearing sucks and I wear hearing aids, I find the earpiece to be a fair bit better for me and the speaker to be a whole lot better for call use...for my ears at least.

 

What is still frustrating is that the signal in the house stinks. It goes from 26 to 3G to 31 and seems to get stuck between the three just like the Note 4.

 

1/8 mile away I have very fast 41 connection and it does show exactly this on the Sprint coverage map. Frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am able to clearly make calls at home most of the time...although there are times when zero bars are present (I know this is a rather useless signal strength indicator) and I am on 3G that things get pretty scratchy / garbles for a few seconds...but that is infrequent.

 

Most other places the call quality is excellent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say, this is the first phone I've consistently been connected to 4G without needing any cycling of airplane mode. On my G2 I don't think I would have known Sprint had LTE in many places if I wouldn't have manually cycled the radio - that phone stuck on 3G way too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that Samsung can improve on (and Sprint can help them with it), even if the phone RF isn't as good, is rescanning for LTE.  It seems the iPhone does a really good job at that.  My Note 4 takes a bit of time to go back on 4G if it drops to 3G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RF wise band 41 is doing better on this device by a few db better than my S6, M9, LG Flex, or LG G3.

Strongest signal and about double the speeds I normal get inside at home. I'll need to do some more testing, but so far a positive surprise!

Anyone else notice anything about b41 performance good or bad?

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...