Jump to content

Moto X 2015 "Pure Edition" [users thread]


nexuss4g

Recommended Posts

Bands

UMTS GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

UMTS/HSPA+ (800, 850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz)

4G LTE (B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 28, 40, 41)

 

http://www.motorola.com/us/smartphones/moto-x-pure.html#specs-moto-x-pure-us

 

No band 26?

 

Phone looks good for the price-point, main concern would be the battery size to handle that QHD display.

We will have to find out the model number and check that device against the FCC docs. Maybe be a mistaken omission. It's also missing VZW B13.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bands

UMTS GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

UMTS/HSPA+ (800, 850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz)

4G LTE (B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 28, 40, 41)

 

http://www.motorola.com/us/smartphones/moto-x-pure.html#specs-moto-x-pure-us

 

No band 26?

 

Phone looks good for the price-point, main concern would be the battery size to handle that QHD display.

No band 26, not for Sprint Spark then. Does those bands in the spec sheet coincide with the FCC docs?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two tenths of an inch is a deal breaker for you? That's about the width of this O. If you can live with 5.5, you can live with 5.7.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

Also the screen could be bigger, and the phone could remain relatively the same size (e.g. This phone looks to have a bigger screen (5.7) than the LG G4 (5.5), yet the style is almost exactly the same width as the G4).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No band 26, not for Sprint Spark then. Does those bands in the spec sheet coincide with the FCC docs?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

This is just for the Pure Edition.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They seem to have kept the bezel size at bay, making it alot more manageable, not much bigger than a GS6.

 

Here is a screen shot for a comparison
DSC_0737.0.jpg

 

To be honest, the Nexus 6 really is great once you get used to the size, its hard to go back to a tiny 5inch display. 

 

My sister has a Nexus 5, and its incredible how much more precise you need to be while typing.

 

But I do believe 5.5-5.7 could be the sweet spot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the screen could be bigger, and the phone could remain relatively the same size (e.g. This phone looks to have a bigger screen (5.7) than the LG G4 (5.5), yet the style is almost exactly the same width as the G4).

 

153.9 x 76.1 X Style

159 x 83 N6

142 x 72 S5

148 x 76 G4

 

So pretty much G4 sized as you say.  That's doable 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the screen could be bigger, and the phone could remain relatively the same size (e.g. This phone looks to have a bigger screen (5.7) than the LG G4 (5.5), yet the style is almost exactly the same width as the G4).

Another excellent point.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will have to find out the model number and check that device against the FCC docs. Maybe be a mistaken omission. It's also missing VZW B13.

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

I think right now they are only listing specs for the "pure" edition (FCC ID IHDT56UC2). As they get closer to release they'll probably also list the other variant (FCC ID IHDT56UC1) too. That one has band 26.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They seem to have kept the bezel size at bay, making it alot more manageable

 

 

https://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/wABq8WHwi7xJuDrlr8Ys7Djksq8=/1020x0/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3913308/DSC_0737.0.jpg

 

To be honest, the Nexus 6 really is great once you get used to the size, its hard to go back to a tiny 5inch display.

 

My sister has a Nexus 5, and its incredible how much more precise you need to be while typing.

 

But I do believe 5.5-5.7 could be the sweet spot!

I have gotten used to my Nexus 6. Although one hand typing is a bear. And every time I think I'm good with it, I pick up my wife's Moto X 2014 and I fall back in love with it. I'm looking forward to dropping down to the 5.7 again. And I think I like the light adjustments Moto makes to Android. I miss being able to wave my hand over my phone and see the time. The Nexus 6 almost feels like a step backward from the Moto X 2014.

 

I can't believe I have gotten excited over Motorola products. I have not been a Moto fan in the past. But I'm saving my pennies to try to be able to move up to the Moto X 2015 this year. But pennies have been hard to come by in 2015. At least for me.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have gotten used to my Nexus 6. Although one hand typing is a bear. And every time I think I'm good with it, I pick up my wife's Moto X 2014 and I fall back in love with it. I'm looking forward to dropping down to the 5.7 again. And I think I like the light adjustments Moto makes to Android. I miss being able to wave my hand over my phone and see the time. The Nexus 6 almost feels like a step backward from the Moto X 2014.

 

I can't believe I have gotten excited over Motorola products. I have not been a Moto fan in the past. But I'm saving my pennies to try to be able to move up to the Moto X 2015 this year. But pennies have been hard to come by in 2015. At least for me.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

I just installed PureNexus rom that has full Sprint DM support, really tough to start over..

 

I will concede 6 is a tiny bit too big.

 

But I would never go back to anything smaller than 5.5.

 

But this 5.7 device looks the part!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think right now they are only listing specs for the "pure" edition (FCC ID IHDT56UC2). As they get closer to release they'll probably also list the other variant (FCC ID IHDT56UC1) too. That one has band 26.

Yeah, it's the Pure Edition. We already have a writeup on the Wall regarding FCC docs on the Sprint model, and it includes B26. But I am still hoping that the FCC docs on the Pure Edition model shows B26 available. I know many of our S4GRU member set would like to have an unlocked Pure Edition model over the Sprint model, if possible.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's the Pure Edition. We already have a writeup on the Wall regarding FCC docs on the Sprint model, and it includes B26. But I am still hoping that the FCC docs on the Pure Edition model shows B26 available. I know many of our S4GRU member set would like to have an unlocked Pure Edition model over the Sprint model, if possible.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

 

If I were getting this, it'd be the Pure Edition, not the Sprint edition, so hopefully the Pure does really have the B26 it needs.  Otherwise, I'm holding out for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's the Pure Edition. We already have a writeup on the Wall regarding FCC docs on the Sprint model, and it includes B26. But I am still hoping that the FCC docs on the Pure Edition model shows B26 available. I know many of our S4GRU member set would like to have an unlocked Pure Edition model over the Sprint model, if possible.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

 

Sure, but I'm guessing Sprint doesn't.  Wouldn't surprise me if they keep the Spark enabled version for themselves as a differentiator.  So you'll have a choice between universal network compatibility or network performance on Sprint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will have to find out the model number and check that device against the FCC docs. Maybe be a mistaken omission. It's also missing VZW B13.

I think right now they are only listing specs for the "pure" edition (FCC ID IHDT56UC2). As they get closer to release they'll probably also list the other variant (FCC ID IHDT56UC1) too. That one has band 26.

Yeah, it's the Pure Edition. We already have a writeup on the Wall regarding FCC docs on the Sprint model, and it includes B26. But I am still hoping that the FCC docs on the Pure Edition model shows B26 available. I know many of our S4GRU member set would like to have an unlocked Pure Edition model over the Sprint model, if possible.

 

Tim basically covered all of this in our article on The Wall three weeks ago and our discussions prior to that in the staff FCC OET thread.  What we can add to that now is the "UC2" variant will be sold as the Pure Edition.  But there is absolutely no chance it is usable on Sprint.

 

The Pure Edition does indeed lack band 26.  It is a curious omission, since it includes band 5 and covers all other Sprint LTE bands.  Additionally, it supports 2x CA -- just not on band 41.  Most damningly, the Pure Edition specs from Motorola claim CDMA2000 support, but that was never authorized in the FCC OET testing.  The CDMA2000 is just a latent capability of the Snapdragon X10 modem on board the Snapdragon 808 chipset.

 

So, in a nutshell, the "UC1" variant is the only one for Sprint.  And it also covers VZW -- should VZW not have its own Droid version this time around.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-389-teaser-hello-moto-x/

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... It is a curious omission, since it includes band 5 and covers all other Sprint LTE bands.  Additionally, it supports 2x CA -- just not on band 41.

...

AJ

Yeah, that is a darn shame because once a device already supports B5, then from a technical perspective, adding support for B26 is a relatively minor effort (compared to adding say B41 to a US device which might otherwise doesn't support super-high bands and/or LTE TDD). Not sure what was Motorola's thinking on this one, especially given they put B41 support in the device.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find this whole naming system to be really dump. X Style, Play, Pure? Its confusing.

 

It also doesnt help that not only are the sizes all different, but so are the specs. I dont like the Iphone but Apple has the naming system right.

 

Anyone know if the battery is removable?

 

Do these phones have pedometers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that is a darn shame because once a device already supports B5, then from a technical perspective, adding support for B26 is a relatively minor effort (compared to adding say B41 to a US device which might otherwise doesn't support super-high bands and/or LTE TDD). Not sure what was Motorola's thinking on this one, especially given they put B41 support in the device.

 

The band 41 support is important to some international operators, so there is that explanation.  But I suppose when Motorola knew at some point that the Pure Edition was going to include band 29 supplemental downlink for AT&T and never going to land on Sprint, it was not worth any added expense to include band 26 and test CDMA2000.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The band 41 support is important to some international operators, so there is that explanation.  But I suppose when Motorola knew at some point that the Pure Edition was going to include band 29 supplemental downlink for AT&T and never going to land on Sprint, it was not worth any added expense to include band 26 and test CDMA2000.

 

AJ

True, however, the Nexus 6 does have support for bands 29 and 26 so at least there is precedent for a recent Motorola handset which supports both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tim basically covered all of this in our article on The Wall three weeks ago and our discussions prior to that in the staff FCC OET thread.  What we can add to that now is the "UC2" variant will be sold as the Pure Edition.  But there is absolutely no chance it is usable on Sprint.

 

The Pure Edition does indeed lack band 26.  It is a curious omission, since it includes band 5 and covers all other Sprint LTE bands.  Additionally, it supports 2x CA -- just not on band 41.  Most damningly, the Pure Edition specs from Motorola claim CDMA2000 support, but that was never authorized in the FCC OET testing.  The CDMA2000 is just a latent capability of the Snapdragon X10 modem on board the Snapdragon 808 chipset.

 

So, in a nutshell, the "UC1" variant is the only one for Sprint.  And it also covers VZW -- should VZW not have its own Droid version this time around.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-389-teaser-hello-moto-x/

 

AJ

 

UC1 per FCC docs

LTE bands 2 4 5 7 12 13 17 25 26 41

 

UC2 per FCC docs

LTE bands 2 4 5 7 12 17 25 29 41

 

Specs per Motorola for Pure edition

LTE bands 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 12 17 20 25 28 40 41

 

Misprints aside and given the UC2 is the Pure edition, why the discrepancies between the Motorola spec page and the FCC docs for the UC2 as far as LTE bands? Like the inclusion of B29 for UC2 (not listed on Pure edition) or the omission of B1, 3, 8, 20, 28, and 40 for the UC2.

 

Also, why are they marketing pure edition as universal if it won't work on sprint?

 

Thanks

Edited by always_learner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, however, the Nexus 6 does have support for bands 29 and 26 so at least there is precedent for a recent Motorola handset which supports both.

 

Very different price points, though.  This Pure Edition is being sold at $399, correct?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Misprints aside and given the UC2 is the Pure edition, why the discrepancies between the Motorola spec page and the FCC docs for the UC2 as far as LTE bands? Like the inclusion of B29 for UC2 (not listed on Pure edition) or the omission of B1, 3, 8, 20, 28, and 40 for the UC2.

 

Most/all of those others bands are non US.  FCC OET authorization documents typically do not include them, as they are not the purview of the FCC.  And band 29 is a supplemental downlink only band -- meaning reception, not transmission.  So, band 29 is a special case, a very odd case.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My personal concern is will sprint whitelist the Moto X variant for their network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...