Jump to content

HTC EVO 4G LTE for Sprint review -- Engadget


cletus

Recommended Posts

Engadget has some of the most inconsistent reviewers ever. I just don't understand that site at times, not to mention if you call them out on anything you'll probably get banned.

 

That and if you break one of their commandments such as, "Thou shall not talk bad about the iPhone!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of gender, I was just pointing out that it was very unprofessional and kills any credibility of the review or interview.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

Don't worry, none of us intended on taking anything to a personal level but like you said the lack of professionalism that comes from engadget at times is appalling and they should know better than to publish some of the things they do at times. They have really gone down hill over the last few years or so. For the most part I go there mainly for entertainment purposes in the comment sections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well balanced in my opinion. I usually discount any Sense related reviews, pro or con, because Sense inspires pretty polarizing opinions in folks. I like it so having it is a plus. I'm running CM now and I miss some of my Sense widgets. The battery life seemed a little low but you never really know what "used it a bit" means from person to person. I'm looking forward to laying my eyes on the screen as I keep hearing raves about it.

 

I haven't heard any reports on whether this will be shipping with an unlocked bootloader or if it will be easily unlockable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what's the deal with the LTE SIM being embedded in the device rather than easily removable like other carrier LTE devices?

 

It was probably a choice between embedded memory like the One X and removable sim or expandable memory and embedded sim. I think Sprint made the right decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I want to know if HD voice reduces voice lag. Right now there's 300 ms of one directional lag on a cell-to-cell call, or 600ms round-trip. Reducing that to 150ms or less (what you get now with a land line to cell call) would improve calls a lot more than wide band audio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

You mind elaborating?

 

I think people would prefer to have expandable memory over being able to hot swap sim cards, especially when they are used to not being able to do so on a cdma network.

 

For me, I like to listen to music on the go, but sometimes My signal falls in and on( especially when I am on the train). I'd rather have my music stored on the phone and not in the cloud.

 

And for Sprint benefit, They see less unnecessary usage. Think about if most people had to switch to cloud storage for music. Their internet usage would go through the roof. ATT/Verizon/tmobile benefit from overage charges, but sprint would not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think people would prefer to have expandable memory over being able to hot swap sim cards, especially when they are used to not being able to do so on a cdma network.

 

For me, I like to listen to music on the go, but sometimes My signal falls in and on( especially when I am on the train). I'd rather have my music stored on the phone and not in the cloud.

 

And for Sprint benefit, They see less unnecessary usage. Think about if most people had to switch to cloud storage for music. Their internet usage would go through the roof. ATT/Verizon/tmobile benefit from overage charges, but sprint would not.

 

I was actually referring to the SIM situation. But I agree with you regarding MicroSD. However it seems that google is going doing away with expandable memory (http://www.phonearena.com/news/Why-Google-wants-to-kill-SD-cards-and-whats-holding-them-back_id23986), only time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I was actually referring to the SIM situation. But I agree with you regarding MicroSD. However it seems that google is going doing away with expandable memory (http://www.phonearena.com/news/Why-Google-wants-to-kill-SD-cards-and-whats-holding-them-back_id23986), only time will tell.

 

the sim was an assumption on my part. The mircoSD card slot is in the same spot as the One S MircoSim slot.

 

Edit: It is also in a similar spot as the One X microSIM slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waiting for the beast 4G LTE, Quad Core, 2GB Ram, LG Phone. I would be all over that thing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't get why they simply don't allow people to have access to the SIM card.

 

Sprint probably hasn't set up the support infrastructure for it yet; their assumption from the start has been that the only ID for a phone is the MEID. And really there's no pressing need the way Sprint is set up at the moment: the only LTE phones that work on their network's frequencies are Sprint-branded (and that's unlikely to change until at least iPhone 5), there are no CDMA phones in North America that use SIMs for CDMA (even the "world phones" that Sprint and Verizon sell use the SIMs only for GSM/UMTS access; CDMA activation is at the device level, not tied to the SIM); and SIM standards are changing anyway.

 

Once Nokia and Apple (or, more likely, EU regulators) sort out which "nano-SIM" wins Sprint can just adopt that across the board for new phones and save themselves a world of headaches that everyone else is going to have if it turns out that nano-SIM isn't mechanically compatible with mini or micro and people start wedging them into their phones anyway.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint probably hasn't set up the support infrastructure for it yet; their assumption from the start has been that the only ID for a phone is the MEID. And really there's no pressing need the way Sprint is set up at the moment: the only LTE phones that work on their network's frequencies are Sprint-branded (and that's unlikely to change until at least iPhone 5), there are no CDMA phones in North America that use SIMs for CDMA (even the "world phones" that Sprint and Verizon sell use the SIMs only for GSM/UMTS access; CDMA activation is at the device level, not tied to the SIM); and SIM standards are changing anyway.

 

Once Nokia and Apple (or, more likely, EU regulators) sort out which "nano-SIM" wins Sprint can just adopt that across the board for new phones and save themselves a world of headaches that everyone else is going to have if it turns out that nano-SIM isn't mechanically compatible with mini or micro and people start wedging them into their phones anyway.

 

Makes perfect sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Engadget's review has been updated. One quote I found of interest:

 

"Update: We finally put the EVO 4G LTE through our usual battery rundown test (looping a video with brightness and volume set to 50%, Bluetooth disabled, WiFi turned on but not connected and CDMA plus LTE enabled) and the phone lasted eight hours and 55 minutes, just like AT&T's One X -- this despite a larger 2000mAh battery (vs. 1800mAh on its cousin) and a strong CDMA signal. The difference is likely due to the LTE radio being enabled without a network available. We were unable to test HD Voice because the feature is not expected to start rolling out on Sprint's network until "late 2012", according to a spokesperson. Regular calls, however, sounded clear on both ends and reception was problem free."

 

http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/10/htc-evo-4g-lte-for-sprint-review/

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Engadget's review has been updated. One quote I found of interest:

 

"Update: We finally put the EVO 4G LTE through our usual battery rundown test (looping a video with brightness and volume set to 50%, Bluetooth disabled, WiFi turned on but not connected and CDMA plus LTE enabled) and the phone lasted eight hours and 55 minutes, just like AT&T's One X -- this despite a larger 2000mAh battery (vs. 1800mAh on its cousin) and a strong CDMA signal. The difference is likely due to the LTE radio being enabled without a network available. We were unable to test HD Voice because the feature is not expected to start rolling out on Sprint's network until "late 2012", according to a spokesperson. Regular calls, however, sounded clear on both ends and reception was problem free."

 

http://www.engadget....-sprint-review/

 

I am not tech guru but doesn't cdma use more juice than gsm? Also if they said they had it set up as cdma/lte(with no lte signal) versus just cdma which would also cause it to use a little more juice. So maybe I am reading this wrong but its almost as if they are saying that they were slightly disappointed since it has a slightly larger battery compared to the one x. Anyway, to me it would seem like the evolte will have excellent battery performance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not tech guru but doesn't cdma use more juice than gsm? Also if they said they had it set up as cdma/lte(with no lte signal) versus just cdma which would also cause it to use a little more juice. So maybe I am reading this wrong but its almost as if they are saying that they were slightly disappointed since it has a slightly larger battery compared to the one x. Anyway, to me it would seem like the evolte will have excellent battery performance.

 

If the phone wasn't constantly searching for LTE it would have gotten better battery life overall. They may have purposely did this to try to discredit the bigger battery, or they were just being dumb. I'm sure it gets better battery life overall once it's always connected to LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a reasonable battery test to run it in CDMA/LTE mode, just not a definitive test. Once LTE starts lighting up in markets around the country there will be many people who leave the LTE radio on so that when they are in range of a signal they will get the faster speed. We know that even when all markets are active there will not be 100% LTE everywhere.

 

I do think they should have also run the battery test in CDMA only mode to accurately represent what consumers will be facing once the device becomes available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the phone wasn't constantly searching for LTE it would have gotten better battery life overall. They may have purposely did this to try to discredit the bigger battery, or they were just being dumb. I'm sure it gets better battery life overall once it's always connected to LTE.

 

Really? I was under the impression that LTE was an overall battery drain. My friend has a thunderbolt (not known for it's battery longevity, granted) and he leaves his LTE radio on 100% of the time but the majority of the battery drain seems to happen when he is actually using the phone to transfer files etc. As a mobile hotspot he said it lasted 2 and a half hours for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are no CDMA phones in North America that use SIMs for CDMA (even the "world phones" that Sprint and Verizon sell use the SIMs only for GSM/UMTS access; CDMA activation is at the device level, not tied to the SIM); and SIM standards are changing anyway.

 

I would almost agree with you except that I can hot swap my verizon sim into any verizon LTE phone and it will pick up my account without having to make any calls to anyone. works just like AT&T or T-Mobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would almost agree with you except that I can hot swap my verizon sim into any verizon LTE phone and it will pick up my account without having to make any calls to anyone. works just like AT&T or T-Mobile.

 

I agree - playing with some Verizon phones I was just swapping SIMS around and it was grand.

 

Just a heads up - you can activate new phones at sprint.com/activate or from your sprint.com account. Beats having to call someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.phonearen...E-Review_id3030

 

A nice detailed review, including some info that I have not read before on pg 3 of the review:

 

"Videos looked wonderful on the large, highresolutiondisplay. The EVO 4G LTE was able to handle all the different file types we threw at it (DivX, XviD, H.264 and MPEG-4) in all manner of resolutions. The stock video player has some tricks up its sleeve, like the aforementioned image capture, and the HTC Movie Editor app lets you edit your video clips on the go."

 

My only gripe about the review is that he says it has a good to very good camera (except in low light) and then lists the camera in the "cons" section.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...