Jump to content

Sprint Organic Network Expansion Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

From here: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-382-sprint-planning-large-network-expansion-adding-9000-new-lte-sites-nationwide/

  • 1,100 - Decommissioned iDEN sites converted for new Sprint CDMA/LTE coverage and increased density in some key under served areas (Dualband and Triband)
  • 1,600 – New coverage expansion sites targeting high roaming areas and key identified market expansion areas (Dualband and Triband)
  • 800 – New Dualband sites in exurban and new suburban areas places with new or projected population growth
  • 500 – New Triband sites in Urban and Suburban areas to infill coverage where 1900 and 2600 currently do not reach or reach well and 800 capacity would also be improved
  • 5,000 – New Urban and Suburban TDD-LTE 2600 “Spark” only sites infilling existing coverages for better signal quality, indoor performance, and capacity. It is not known if these are all macro sites or a mix of macro and pico cells.

Project Ocean 

In additional to this new Expansion Project, Sprint also already has two existing projects under way for targeted regional expansion based on recent acquisition. In Missouri and Central Illinois, Sprint is working on Project Ocean, which involves adding more than 100 former U.S. Cellular sites.

...

Project Cedar

A thousand miles to the northwest, Sprint is embarking on Project Cedar in Montana. A plan to add 230 sites to the Sprint network in the Treasure State. Sprint purchased the defunct network assets from Chinook Wireless back in August of 2014. Chinook Wireless operated their service under the Cellular One name in Montana. Project Cedar takes the Chinook Wireless decommissioned sites and adds Network Vision DualBand and TriBand sites in their place.

... 

 

 

What are your thoughts? What do you expect? Is it just another daily topic to feed the sheeple? Are we leading the lambs to slaughter? Stay tuned next week for more ESS FOUURR GREWWWWW... errr.

 

Discuss people. 

  • Like 22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tower's in my area have not been touched,this will just make it that they still don't get touched way to go Sprint.

 

Uhhh, no.  Network Vision still continues.  In fact, there are some internal conversations about a push to finish up LTE to remaining sites via microwave.  We also have seen some evidence of this in Grand Junction, Colorado where permitting recently started to microwave all the remaining sites in that area.

 

Sprint is being much more aggressive in completing existing work as well as adding more scope.  This is all good news, no matter where you live.  Also, i expect some iDEN sites to replace some sites in rural locations like yours, too.

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhhh, no.  Network Vision still continues.  In fact, there are some internal conversations about a push to finish up LTE to remaining sites via microwave.  We also have seen some evidence of this in Grand Junction, Colorado where permitting recently started to microwave all the remaining sites in that area.

 

Sprint is being much more aggressive in completing existing work as well as adding more scope.  This is all good news, no matter where you live.  Also, i expect some iDEN sites to replace some sites in rural locations like yours, too.

I have been hoping that they would do that, all this waiting around while equipment is ready to go has been really frustrating. Do you think they will just use microwave in the long term or just short term until the fiber is secured?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been hoping that they would do that, all this waiting around while equipment is ready to go has been really frustrating. Do you think they will just use microwave in the long term or just short term until the fiber is secured?

 

Many of the remaining locations can be served by microwave for a very long time.  Some of the higher capacity sites may still need fiber sooner than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Sprint ever get faster at turning up MW backhaul then they were in the initial Chicago deployment? If they did the remaining sites and expansion should pick up pace.

 

Sent from my 831C using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is excellent! As we all know, many Sprint markets have outgrown their current sites and are much in need of some expansion. I can not wait to see the fruits of this project! Maybe they'll expand a little in Charlotte... ;)

 

-Anthony

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

excited1.gif

 

That said, I'm a realist and Madison probably isn't going to be a prime time spot for new build out despite all my calls and network reports. :) 

 

Now, when I visit family in St. Louis, it sounds like there is quite a bit of work being done there already for new sites from the USCC, which will be nice.  Last I was there (Nov), it's a bit rough around the edges for consistent coverage for LTE. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

while i'm definitely excited they are expanding and densifying their network i would be even more excited if they just got the GMO sites converted to full builds and got LTE live on them around here! while there are areas of the des moines metro that have outgrown the old network and could use a site here or there to help expand coverage, they would get much more bang for their buck expanding coverage, especially rural coverage, by just converting the GMO sites so they get 800 service.

 

hopefully the rumor about converting around half of the existing GMO sites is further along in planning and deployment and will get completed sooner :)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice. What time of time frame are we expecting for these projects? When will they start, and how long do we expect before the project is substantially completed?

 

Unknown.  It depends on when funding occurs, and at what rate it can be funded.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knowing that an expansion is happening, I believe reporting trouble areas via the Sprint Zone app is useful and may actually be fruitful now.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is excellent! As we all know, many Sprint markets have outgrown their current sites and are much in need of some expansion. I can not wait to see the fruits of this project! Maybe they'll expand a little in Charlotte... ;)

 

-Anthony

Speaking of this, why nothing about Clearwire? Here, Sprint towers + non-redundant Clear towers = site density matching the Deathstar (who has always had the highest density here since VZ ended up with both CLR licenses). Of course there are areas with no Clear presence (mostly brand-new suburbs and areas outside of Clear's original service area within I-485) that will probably benefit from this, in addition to areas that need more capacity. But a lot of our issues could be solved with some Clear sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of this, why nothing about Clearwire? Here, Sprint towers + non-redundant Clear towers = site density matching the Deathstar (who has always had the highest density here since VZ ended up with both CLR licenses). Of course there are areas with no Clear presence (mostly brand-new suburbs and areas outside of Clear's original service area within I-485) that will probably benefit from this, in addition to areas that need more capacity. But a lot of our issues could be solved with some Clear sites.

 

It's possible Clearwire only sites are a part of the program.  Or part of another covert project...Project Clearly Awesome.  But I did not in the article the absence of this specific aspect.  I just don't know what to think of it at this time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Project Ocean include Chicago or any of its suburbs? As far as I know we had a USCC conversion in Hampshire. And I can look out my window and see a former USCC site one that would be a fantastic conversion!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yes.  There are a few USCC sites in the Chicago area part of Project Ocean.  We do not know the scope, but we expect at least a dozen.  But could be larger.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder if Albuquerque will get any love of this.

 

The source said that the project is nationwide and will likely impact every state.  So I would say yes, most likely.  But to the extent in ABQ?  I don't know.  I would expect B26 will provide complete ABQ coverage.  Some additional West Mesa and Rio Rancho sites could be helpful.  And B41 infill sites as needed for capacity.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it mean Sprint plan to spend money on new towers rather than 600Mhz?

 

No.  Completely unrelated.  600MHz will still be useful regardless of Sprint adding these 9,000 sites or not.  600MHz will be very useful to many of these sites, especially if Sprint could get a nationwide 10x10 license in 600MHz.  But 600 is far enough out now it would be foolish to wait and do nothing until after the auction and device/network ecosystem is ready for it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...