Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

On 8/24/2017 at 5:33 PM, gusherb said:

I found another new site going up and this time it's not AT&T or Verizon (Verizon is already on this tower). It doesn't look like TMO....So could it actually be a new Sprint macro!? The only thing I could tell that it might be Sprint is the two equal sized outer panels and shorter inner panel (two B26/25 and one B41 panel in the middle), but I'm holding reservation about it being Sprint just because they don't really ever add sites, and there's already a Sprint site right in that area. 

 

8eE81Iw.jpg

2jdi9kz.jpg

SX29gVR.jpg

nyEE3BL.png

 

 

On 8/25/2017 at 8:03 AM, Dkoellerwx said:

 

It looks like it might be T-Mo to me. No indication of a new Sprint site going in in that area.

Turned out to be T-Mobile

mSJTacG.jpg

uP7ad8w.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, bucdenny said:

Is it live?  What speeds are you getting?

30-40 megs. The dead zone in Woodman's has been fixed.  In the store it was more like 10-15megs.  Much Better then no service or 3G.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, runagun said:

30-40 megs. The dead zone in Woodman's has been fixed.  In the store it was more like 10-15megs.  Much Better then no service or 3G.  

Awesome to see the pace of small cell deployments coming up! Now they just need to get them in the parking lots of every big box store so B41 doesn't cut out :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 3/10/2018 at 1:44 PM, runagun said:

Yay! The current antennas (Verizon, etc) on the water tower were proposed to the administration by me back when I was in HS! Glad to see Sprint catching up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2018 at 9:30 PM, Paynefanbro said:

Wow, those are unattractive. Do other parts of Chicago have rules about how these are supposed to look that go beyond "make it the same color as the pole it's on"?

Who cares what it looks like? I didn't know this was the Victoria Secret Fashion Show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This seemed like a rather odd placement for a small cell, on a pole in an alley. Not sure anyone's getting the best use out of it there as opposed to being along the actual main road instead.

w0Mpxqp.jpg

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gusherb said:

This seemed like a rather odd placement for a small cell, on a pole in an alley. Not sure anyone's getting the best use out of it there as opposed to being along the actual main road instead.

 

 


Very inconspicuous :P 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I'm having a strange issue that just started happening 1-2 weeks ago.  I have a Pixel XL (1st gen), and as I move around the city (walking, car, bus, el, etc.) I will lose LTE data -- the signal strength bars will be just an empty outline.  A few seconds later, it'll be full strength but roaming with an "R" next to it, then empty outline again.  Then it will come back up full strength LTE.  This repeats frequently-- every 1-2 minutes.  It doesn't seem to be an issue when I'm stationary at home or at work.

After performing all self-troubleshooting I could (remove/clean/reseat SIM card, reset network settings, *#*#SCRTN#*#*, factory reset entire device, etc.) I contacted Sprint for assistance last night.  I was transferred to level 2 tech support in OKC.

The tech said that it was because there were so many magic boxes that have come online in my area, and that's straining the network; she said all of the cells around me were "2.5g, slow data only, with the nearest full LTE tower 2+ miles away", and when I clarified-- 2.5 GHz LTE or truly 2.5 G data speeds, she said the latter.  That doesn't sound right to me-- I've never had issues like this anywhere in the city, and this was happening to me all over.  Edgewater, Lakeview, Lincoln Park, even on the south side along the Dan Ryan.  But, isn't happening anywhere else outside the city.  Was in Central Illinois all weekend and didn't have a single issue once I got out of Chicagoland.

I also did a search online, and found some people complaining about something similar back in 2016 in Chicago and Indy, but nothing in the last 1.5 years.  It's just strange this started happening, and I am not sure if the tech support person I spoke with either fully understood the issue or provided me with the correct answer.  She basically said, "I'll put in a ticket, but there's nothing else we can do right now." 

After having experienced this for almost 2 weeks, I'm wondering if there is value in trying to call back and speak with someone else for a second opinion.  Could an influx of new magic boxes really be causing this problem for me?  And am I the only one experiencing this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having a strange issue that just started happening 1-2 weeks ago.  I have a Pixel XL (1st gen), and as I move around the city (walking, car, bus, el, etc.) I will lose LTE data -- the signal strength bars will be just an empty outline.  A few seconds later, it'll be full strength but roaming with an "R" next to it, then empty outline again.  Then it will come back up full strength LTE.  This repeats frequently-- every 1-2 minutes.  It doesn't seem to be an issue when I'm stationary at home or at work.
After performing all self-troubleshooting I could (remove/clean/reseat SIM card, reset network settings, *#*#SCRTN#*#*, factory reset entire device, etc.) I contacted Sprint for assistance last night.  I was transferred to level 2 tech support in OKC.
The tech said that it was because there were so many magic boxes that have come online in my area, and that's straining the network; she said all of the cells around me were "2.5g, slow data only, with the nearest full LTE tower 2+ miles away", and when I clarified-- 2.5 GHz LTE or truly 2.5 G data speeds, she said the latter.  That doesn't sound right to me-- I've never had issues like this anywhere in the city, and this was happening to me all over.  Edgewater, Lakeview, Lincoln Park, even on the south side along the Dan Ryan.  But, isn't happening anywhere else outside the city.  Was in Central Illinois all weekend and didn't have a single issue once I got out of Chicagoland.
I also did a search online, and found some people complaining about something similar back in 2016 in Chicago and Indy, but nothing in the last 1.5 years.  It's just strange this started happening, and I am not sure if the tech support person I spoke with either fully understood the issue or provided me with the correct answer.  She basically said, "I'll put in a ticket, but there's nothing else we can do right now." 
After having experienced this for almost 2 weeks, I'm wondering if there is value in trying to call back and speak with someone else for a second opinion.  Could an influx of new magic boxes really be causing this problem for me?  And am I the only one experiencing this?
Are you experiencing these issues in the suburbs too?

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tongboy said:

Are you experiencing these issues in the suburbs too?

I'm afraid I can't answer that-- I don't really go to the suburbs.  However, when I was on my way out of town Friday afternoon, I didn't experience any issues once I got on I-57 (from I-94) and then to I-80 to Joliet. The only place I've experienced this is in the city proper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My current temp job takes me from Crystal Lake to Naperville to Oak Lawn, even to a few neighborhoods in Chicago (e.g. Bronzeville, Ravenswood), but I never had a problem that severe. Well, maybe when I go to a nearby park called Lake Park in Des Plaines - my Pixel XL may switch from LTE to 3G, and then back. Maybe its "large" body of water degrades the signal?

I do a fair amount of driving on the expressways and tollways, especially when on a job earlier this year, but had no issues with my Pixel phone - in fact, sometimes it worked better than my work Verizon phone when going back and forth on the southern portion of the I-294 tollway. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

These are the earfcn that I have seen in chicago.

8290/8665/8763/41374/41176/40978/41111/40913

8290 should be 10x10 which has 1875 Mhz uplink. But that is just from my logs need in person to be sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Sprint plans to start turning on its 5G network in Chicago during the first half of this year.

Representatives from T-Mobile, AT&T and Verizon all declined to comment on specific Chicago plans.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. 93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...