Jump to content

Contributors to this blog

[Teaser] The 9th Galaxy Arrives Early - The Galaxy S9

lilotimz

2,586 views

Tim Yu
Sprint 4G Rollout Updates
January 12, 2018 - 5:30 PM PST


"New year, new me. Am I right?"
     ~ signed Samsung

Samsung has decided that the beginning of the new year is a great time to change.  Samsung has decided its newest flagship Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus devices must meet with the FCC OET for certification far earlier than usual. With ever watchful and prying eyes, S4GRU staff discovered the twin filings for two devices with FCC IDs of A3LSMG960U and A3LSMG965U which follows the   previous Samsung numeration of the Galaxy S8 / 8+ (950u/955u) and Galaxy S7 (930u/935u) respectively. In addition, previous leaks for purported international Galaxy S9 variant have captured the ID of 960F and 965F respectively. 

To keep this short and simple, the Galaxy S9, to date, is the most technologically powerful device we've seen at least for Sprint and possibly other entities and the following technical specifications should demonstrate why.

CDMA BC: 0 / 1 / 10
GSM: 850 / 1900
WCDMA Bands: 2, 4 , 5
LTE Band: 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25 , 26 , 29, 30, 38, 41, 66, 71


Downlink Carrier Aggregation (DL CA)
5xB41 (up to 5 B41 carriers aggregated)
B25+41CA (up to 2 B41 carriers - 3 total carriers aggregated )
B26+41CA (up to 2 B41 carriers - 3 total carriers aggregated )
B25+26CA (up to 2 B25 carriers - 3 total carriers aggregated )

Uplink Carrier Aggregation (UL CA)
2xB41 

256 / 64 QAM Downlink/ Uplink

HPUE

CAT 18 Modem
4x4 MIMO B2, 4, 25, 30 , 41, 66
12 spatial streams

Holy bonanza!

This phone supports up to 100 MHz of LTE spectrum being aggregated together from 5 individual Band 41 carriers!

To add to that, it also supports FDD and TDD LTE carrier aggregation by utilizing Band 25 1900 MHz or Band 26 800 MHz as the primary component carrier which would contribute to downlink and uplink while Band 41 is aggregated to it would be downlink only secondary component carriers. Remember the saying of having B25 or B26 uplink with Band 41 downlink, anybody?

Plus  there is expansion of FDD carrier aggregation to that of between Band 25 and Band 26.  This will help a ton in areas where Band 41 and its oodles of capacity does not reach. As the recent CDMA refarming nationwide on PCS spectrum has allowed Sprint to fire up an additional Band 25 carrier,  this means in many Sprint markets there currently exists two Band 25 carriers in addition to a Band 26 carrier. This additional carrier is not forgotten and can now be used alongside the other Band 25 and Band 26 carrier for carrier aggregation.

Last but not least, this phone is "Gigabit Class" by having up to 12 spacial streams means that 4x4 MIMO can be used for 3 separate B41 carriers when aggregated together instead of 2 in the previous generation which supports only 10 spacial streams. Though it was a moot point as the entire generation of Samsung flagships from this past year did not support 4x4 MIMO on Band 41, until now!

A phone this size should not be able to pack so many technologies...but yet it does! A splendid phone and surely a must have for the S4GRU and other tech adept users! 

gs9.png

  • Like 15


18 Comments


Recommended Comments

This is what I've been waiting for. Oh! And the centrally located fingerprint scanner!  Can't forget about that.

Share this comment


Link to comment

In the case of Puerto Rico market, the DL CA,  can it  uses B13 instead of B26  or we just cant  take advantage of this..?

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

I can't comprehend what I just read!!! Launch day I must have this!!!

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment
3 hours ago, Terrell352 said:

I can't comprehend what I just read!!! Launch day I must have this!!!

oh yes me to!!! i want it ....

Share this comment


Link to comment
16 hours ago, ROBERT7 said:

In the case of Puerto Rico market, the DL CA,  can it  uses B13 instead of B26  or we just cant  take advantage of this..?

I suspect that CA with B13 is not included. I have a feeling this phone was in development before that deal happened, so the thought wouldn't have been there yet. However, you should see expanded B41 usage across the island when they are able to start upgrades again.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Man I hope the new iPhone supports all of that carrier aggregation. 

 

Hopefully Sprint does implement TD/FDD CA this year

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 1/13/2018 at 9:00 AM, ROBERT7 said:

In the case of Puerto Rico market, the DL CA,  can it  uses B13 instead of B26  or we just cant  take advantage of this..?

I haven't heard it official that Sprint is using B13 in Puerto Rico?

Share this comment


Link to comment
6 hours ago, Tengen31 said:

I haven't heard it official that Sprint is using B13 in Puerto Rico?

It is official.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Man if there is a auction on this phone I actually might get it in. Geez this thing has everything.

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

I'm assuming if there's CA with B41+B25 or B41+B26 that B25 or B26 can be used for uploads?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Just now, avb said:

I'm assuming if there's CA with B41+B25 or B41+B26 that B25 or B26 can be used for uploads?

If B25/B26 is the primary.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Do we know if Sprint's existing equipment (8T8R, mini macros, etc) can support B25+B41 or B26+B41 with a software upgrade?  Or will this require new equipment?

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • The Wall Articles

  • Wall Comments

    • Airave - Magic Box Tech Support told me yesterday these new units will not begin shipping until at least July 20th.
    • to me rural coverage matters most....because i like being able to make phone calls and send texts in remote areas of the country ...i dont care about speeds i just care about per square mile coverage and over all usability and reliability
    • Tell us how you really feel @MrZorbatron!

      I think that most cellular players exaggerate their coverage. Yes, I suspected a long time ago that T-Mobile was one of the most egregious. Now according to the merger presentation, they will end up with 85,000 macro sites. That will be enough to match the coverage of pretty much everybody.

      Like you, I appreciate not having dropped calls or undelivered texts. In my area on my T-Mobile MVNO, I don't get any but can't say it won't happen elsewhere. Once Charter offers service via their Verizon MVNO, I think I will move my 4 personal lines there. My business line will stay on Sprint/T-Mobile, well, because I can't control that.
    • I do not welcome any part of this.  I don't think T-Mobile really cares about doing anything they say they care about.  I have seen how truly bad their network is in the ways that matter for essential communication, and I want nothing to do with it.  Say what you want about Verizon, but the one thing they have in common with Sprint is that they have historically built out a solid network before trying to make it extremely fast.  I don't care about 50 Mbps to my phone.  I care about calls that don't get disconnected constantly.  I care about that stock trade getting through when I send it, even if carried by EVDO, because EVDO still gets it through. Sprint's "Outdoor coverage" maps might seem exaggerated to some, but T-Mobile's maps are a complete joke.  Maybe Michigan is a bubble, the only state where this is true, but it really is very true here.  T-Mobile is the network of dropped and undelivered calls, mysterious disconnection, and "call failed" error messages. If this goes through, look for me at the nearest Verizon store because price to me is absolutely irrelevant.  I see two things happening if this merger goes through:  1:  Sprint spectrum is used to bolster capacity at T-Mobile sites, and 2:  As much of the current Sprint network as possible goes away, even if it means losing sites that would provide valuable fill-in density.  I saw the latter happen with Sprint and Nextel, after they insisted that all Nextel sites that could serve to increase Sprint coverage would be used.  Similarly, there were locations T-Mobile could have used MetroPCS locations to improve their own coverage but didn't, even where it left holes in their network.
×