Jump to content

Breaking Band: Tri-band LTE / eCSFB issues thread


Recommended Posts

----

EDIT:

 

If this is your first time to this thread, please read this article by Robert (S4GRU Admin): 

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?%2Fblog%2F1%2Fentry-357-nexus-5-and-lg-g2-experience-temporary-sprint-lte-connectivity-issues-due-to-circuit-switched-fallback-technology%2F

 

 

OP:

----

 

As more and more inconsistent LG G2 and Nexus 5 user observations have filtered in over the past few days, S4GRU has decided to reopen a thread that we created as a placeholder to address LTE connectivity issues, if necessary.

 

So, if you have a Sprint Spark tri band device -- especially but not limited to the LG G2 and Nexus 5 -- please report your LTE connectivity experience and location.

 

See my two hypothetical examples below...

 

 

Handset:  LG G2

LTE connectivity:  Great, LTE in places never had before

Location:  Smallville, AB 22222

 

Handset:  Nexus 5

LTE connectivity:  Weak, loses LTE or refuses to connect

Location:  Capital City, YZ 33333

 

 

Please keep this thread objective and factual.  Complaining about the situation serves no productive purpose. But gathering anecdotal evidence that we can cross reference with our Network Vision progress maps can help get to the bottom of the current issues.

 

Finally, expect further edits to this top post, especially as additional insider information and/or S4GRU technical analysis becomes available.

 

Thanks in advance for your reports...

 

AJ

 

------------------------------------------------

 

EDIT:

 

Follow this link for a Sprint memo explaining why Tri-Band devices are not connecting to LTE in some areas: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/5001-tri-band-lteecsfb-issues-thread/page-3?p=235876&do=findComment&comment=235876

 

Follow this link for a breakdown of incumbent and non-incumbent markets, and what that means for your Tri-Band ("Spark") device: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhjoCbLKCt72dHJKMTVrc3lrSE95cklOTnB0V0c0M1E&usp=drive_web#gid=0

 

We're still looking for additional reports, as this does not account for all issues.

 

-David

  • Like 17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thread is open.  Start submitting your reports.  S4GRU is on the case...

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG G2:

 

No LTE Connectivity al all.

 

Harrisburg, PA 17104, 17111

 

Hershey, PA 17033

 

Hummelstown, PA 17036

 

Steelton, PA 17113

 

No modifications or configuration changes to the handset. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG G2:

 

No LTE Connectivity al all.

 

Harrisburg PA 17113, 17104

 

Ah, yes, please include in the report your chosen handset -- and if you have made any modifications or configuration changes to it.  I will make the appropriate revision to the top post.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raleigh, NC market. NEXUS 5.

 

LTE if forced in engineering, but no mobile network if set as such, cant make or receive calls. Phone must be set to 3G.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

Edited by smorcy11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats funny is I was having this issue for almost 2 days when I got the device but then it started working normally.

My guess is I was connecting to legacy 3g while 4g was coming from a different tower. They just finished upgrading my towers 3g so the issue went away.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same as smorcy11 ^ above.  N5, Raleigh, NC market. I haven't tried forcing it from debug menu but zero LTE except when switching back and forth from Global/LTE, whereupon the icon switches momentarily to LTE but goes back to 3G.

Edited by cswiii
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG g2, nexus 5. Lincoln, NE. 68504. No lte. (Connects for 1-2 seconds then falls back to 3g) -4g only accepted sites

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

. Will test the sites west of town that are 4G / 3G accepted.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG G2

 

Excellent 4G reception with no loss of voice or sms

 

Merrmiac, MA, 01860

 

Note: Traveling between Worcester MA and in the Greater Boston area today, 4G LTE worked as well as it did on my Note 3 so it seems to be fine in Central to Northeastern MA where LTE has been live for quite some time.

Edited by jfenton1957
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far all these areas look 'purple' to me.

 

Right.  And this "purple" hypothesis is what we want to test.  Scientific method -- you will not find that at a lot of other sites.  But S4GRU holds itself to a higher standard.  We hope that is why you keep coming back.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right.  And this "purple" hypothesis is what we want to test.  Scientific method -- you will not find that at a lot of other sites.  But S4GRU holds itself to a higher standard.  We hope that is why you keep coming back.

 

;)

 

AJ

well that and the funny videos. Keep up the good work :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nexus 5

Midtown Manhattan 10022

Connects to LTE but data speeds are slower than 3G

Same results before and after I enabled all bands.

 

Live in NJ, 07083, no official LTE but my N5 sometimes shows it is connected but slower than 3G speeds.

 

So is my issue related to what is going on here? I show that I am connected to LTE but my speeds are roughly .25 to .50 Mbps down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am currently in the virgin islands and lte is working perfect on my nexus 5 but I will be back home in atlanta on thursday which has lots of band 41 sites all over the place.  I will give an update then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Handset:  Nexus 5


When connected to LTE then going to making a phone call, will always default to 1x voice and not 1x800. (I'm in a heavily saturated 800SMR area)


Location:  Sycamore, IL 60178 & DeKalb, IL 60115


Link to comment
Share on other sites

. Will test the sites west of town that are 4G / 3G accepted.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

. LTE works great west of Lincoln for the 3G/4g accepted sites

 

 

Screenshot_2013-11-09-19-35-17_zps6a7935

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • It took NINE MONTHS for contractors to replace the traffic light pole they took down for this, but Verizon contractors finally returned to install an oDAS unit in Downtown Brooklyn. I only saw it in the states of having no antennas and then mmWave antenna, so I'm not sure if they added more on top. I'm once again very confused by the placement of this site since it's on the same block as a macro site with mmWave, and standing in this position I can get 2.5Gbps download speeds. What is Verizon doing?
    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz.  Pics of antennas I spotted and speed tests:
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...