Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Missouri Market (includes St. Louis)


riddlebox

Recommended Posts

Anyone using the Nexus 5 with the .15 radio have any CSFB issues? I'm gonna be in the city next week and wanna make sure I don't miss calls/texts.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I haven't had any in the STl metro area

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone using the Nexus 5 with the .15 radio have any CSFB issues? I'm gonna be in the city next week and wanna make sure I don't miss calls/texts.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

There is one site on the Illinois side causing issue. Don't know of others.

 

Rickie

Tapatalk on my LG g2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is one site on the Illinois side causing issue. Don't know of others. RickieTapatalk on my LG g2

 

Its not actually Zumbehl and 94, Port West is closer but it only goes off to the side of 94 across from the billboard site and the rental storage place it's just outside of. They are putting up the panels right now in the snow and freezing rain. Cool, you go guys. Now to make from the car to the apartment without falling on my butt. Sent from my SPH-L900
Live LTE this morning but no time to grab pci, if it's on I will on the way home. Sent from my SPH-L900Hasn't been on since while I'm near it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone using the Nexus 5 with the .15 radio have any CSFB issues? I'm gonna be in the city next week and wanna make sure I don't miss calls/texts.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

We have actually had reports of 3 sites with CSFB issues. 2 on the MO side and one near Granite City IL. Also any newly accepted 4G site will cause problems too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sunday-Wednesday

 

Map is updated!

 

3G-                       100/774-12.9%

4G-                       215/774-27.8%

3G/4G-                 279/774-36.0%

3G/4G/800-          2/774-0.3%

3G/800-               12/774-1.5%

RRU-                    4/774-.0.5%

In Progress/Permit-37/774-4.8%

4G?-                    1/774-.1%

Legacy/Unknown-124/773-16.0%

 

NV Complete-608/774-78.6%

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must end up in the 21.4% a lot. Building penetration is a joke. They have to be embarrassed at this fiasco.

The 800 rollout isn't near as far along. Give it time and the indoor coverage will increase.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must end up in the 21.4% a lot. Building penetration is a joke. They have to be embarrassed at this fiasco. 

 

Embarrassed at what "fiasco"?  Network Vision deployment is an ongoing.  It will be largely complete later this year, and that was the plan.  If you cannot be patient, find another provider.

 

Also, tone it down.  S4GRU does not host Sprint complaints.  Read the rules:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1197-s4gru-posting-guidelines-aka-the-rulez/

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Embarrassed at what "fiasco"?  Network Vision deployment is an ongoing.  It will be largely complete later this year, and that was the plan.  If you cannot be patient, find another provider.

 

Also, tone it down.  S4GRU does not host Sprint complaints.  Read the rules:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1197-s4gru-posting-guidelines-aka-the-rulez/

 

AJ

 

C'mon, AJ. It wouldn't be a NV Sites Complete % update without Killswitch complaining about indoor signal penetration!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

C'mon, AJ. It wouldn't be a NV Sites Complete % update without Killswitch complaining about indoor signal penetration!

 

Exactly!  ;)

 

Sorry I am not a fanboy and can't hold your hands and skip down the hall singing Kumbaya! 

 

Sprint should have never sold LTE phones in a market that can't support them. When I got mine in August I was told by the CSR that it would work perfectly and it was 100% better than the 4G (That worked perfectly for me!) When it didn't, I took it back to return it and they refused. So sue me for having a bitter taste in my mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly!  ;)

 

Sorry I am not a fanboy and can't hold your hands and skip down the hall singing Kumbaya! 

 

Sprint should have never sold LTE phones in a market that can't support them. When I got mine in August I was told by the CSR that it would work perfectly and it was 100% better than the 4G (That worked perfectly for me!) When it didn't, I took it back to return it and they refused. So sue me for having a bitter taste in my mouth.

You had 14 days to return or exchange it and you also still had the WiMax phone you could reactivate. Would you rather Sprint have stuck with WiMax? I think Sprint's Network Vision is pretty darn ambitious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You had 14 days to return or exchange it and you also still had the WiMax phone you could reactivate. Would you rather Sprint have stuck with WiMax? I think Sprint's Network Vision is pretty darn ambitious. 

 

Maybe we could all pitch in a few bucks to pay Killswitche's ETF so we don't have to hear him complain all of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stopped checking this forum around 2 months ago, mostly because I was too lazy to install Tapatalk on my new OS. Looks like nothing much has changed since January...Updates are still rolling in and Killswitch is still complaining.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have actually had reports of 3 sites with CSFB issues. 2 on the MO side and one near Granite City IL. Also any newly accepted 4G site will cause problems too.

I ran into that grabbing the gci/pci for one of the newly accepted sites today off 94. 

 

 

 

Edit. I just reread the wall post about eCSFB  and I guess the fix is to get 3G up to NV accepted. Have any of the 3 got 3G updates and did the problem go away?

 

Edited by DaQue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran into that grabbing the gci/pci for one of the newly accepted sites today off 94. 

 

 

 

Edit. I just reread the wall post about eCSFB  and I guess the fix is to get 3G up to NV accepted. Have any of the 3 got 3G updates and did the problem go away?

 

 

Ericsson has weird problems with CSFB. Unlike Samsung, they are able to install it on legacy sites, but it's not rock solid. Most of the time it works, but some sites have problems, and the 3G upgrade side of things doesn't seem to affect whether it works or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're price for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...