Jump to content

Sprint "Open World" plan (replaces International Value Roaming)


Recommended Posts

Posted

Understood - but are they freely allowed to travel between USA and Cuba?

 

 

I suppose it ultimately depends on one's definition of "freely", but yes, it's quite possible.

 

http://www.cubaati.com/qualifications_family.html

 

http://havana.usembassy.gov/travelling_cuba.html

 

For Cuban-American dual citizens, the Cuban government requires that the traveler enter and depart Cuba on his/her Cuban passport, even though the traveler will use his/her U.S. passport to depart and re-enter the United States.  The Cuban government requires that the traveler obtain a visa prior to arrival.

 

And of course:

 

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2015/09/18/US-to-lift-travel-business-restrictions-against-Cuba-for-first-time-in-decades/5511442604750/

  • Like 1
Posted

And I just noticed this:

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/18/cuba-usa-sprint-idUSL1N11O1KC20150918

 

Sprint Corp said it plans to expand roaming to Cuba but did not offer a set time frame or any additional details.

 

A company spokeswoman told Reuters the phone carrier would be expanding to Cuba "soon" after the U.S. government eased restrictions on Friday for American companies seeking to do business in Cuba.

 

I guess I was on the same page as someone in Overland Park. :)

  • Like 2
Posted

Wow those rates!

 

$2.99 per minute and $2.05 per mb!

 

This might be the one time when I'd actually like to hear what John Legere has to say about the competition. It would be great for both he and Marcelo to provide a much better deal in Cuba than Verizon.

I remember back in analog phone days when US roaming rates were that high!

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I remember back in analog phone days when US roaming rates were that high!

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

I was thinking about that earlier today too, particularly reading those in-store brochures that listed options between analog and digital service, local or national service, and the different areas of roaming, which rates sometimes would vary depending on the selected plan.

 

Sometimes I think about whether the option to bring back local plans with roaming rates would be a good idea or not, though only as an option, not something made standard on all plans.

 

It could be offered for people who don't travel at all and never cost the carriers the high rates they pay to other carriers. In exchange, they can get more data, or data that is less costly than on plans which include roaming.

Posted

Open World works as advertised in Toronto.  It's nice not having to worry about crazy charges or finding a local sim for a short trip.

  • Like 12
Posted

I remember back in analog phone days when US roaming rates were that high!

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

 

You dont even have to go back that far. Just last year, Sprint offered a worst in the industry rate of $2.29 a minute for roaming in Mexico.

 

Its great to see them go from $2.29 to 20 cents to zero!

 

The old CEO had no interest in global travel, which as the Japanese overlords might say, is very midwestern thinking.

  • Like 7
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I guess this explains what Marcelo was doing in Cuba:

 

http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-first-us-carrier-to-sign-direct-cuba-roaming-agreement.htm

 

OVERLAND PARK, Kan. (BUSINESS WIRE), November 02, 2015 - Sprint (NYSE: S) today became the first U.S. wireless carrier to sign a direct roaming agreement with Telecommunications Company of Cuba (ETECSA).

 

“As the commercial relationship between the U.S. and Cuba continues to progress, it is expected that the number of travelers to Cuba will increase exponentially,” said Sprint CEO Marcelo Claure. “We want to make sure any Sprint customer traveling to Cuba can use their phone the same way as they do in the United States.”

 

Claure made the announcement at a signing ceremony in Havana as part of the U.S.-Cuba Business Council (USCBC) delegation to Cuba.

 

As the only U.S. carrier with a direct roaming agreement and a direct long-distance interconnection agreement with Cuban provider ETECSA, Sprint is leading the way for U.S.-Cuba telecommunications.

 

More than 3 million people from around the world are expected to visit Cuba this year. Within 10 years, that number is projected to grow to more than 5 million.

 

The USCBC, an advocacy organization housed at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is a formal commitment by the American business community to build a strong and strategic commercial relationship between Cuba and the United States.

 

Earlier this year, Sprint launched Sprint Global Roaming and in August launched Sprint Open World, an industry-leading plan for connectivity in Canada, Mexico and most other countries across Latin America. The agreement signed today with ETECSA makes it much more convenient for Sprint customers who plan to work, study or visit family in Cuba. Offer details and timing of availability will be announced soon.

 

  • Like 10
Posted

So I just got back from Brazil and once again had issues with incoming calls going straight to voicemail. Data, texts and outgoing calls worked well, but had to tweet to marcelo and sprint to get the sprint care people to look into it instead of having me "call the international desk". I had told them I didn't have time to sit there for an hour trouble shooting the issue and that they should just send the info to the desk. 

The international desk called me after looking into it and said there had been some issues with the settings on their part. You'd think by now it would all be working well. 

Does anyone know in what countries you actually get LTE as the option for the open world data?

Posted

So I just got back from Brazil and once again had issues with incoming calls going straight to voicemail. Data, texts and outgoing calls worked well, but had to tweet to marcelo and sprint to get the sprint care people to look into it instead of having me "call the international desk". I had told them I didn't have time to sit there for an hour trouble shooting the issue and that they should just send the info to the desk.

The international desk called me after looking into it and said there had been some issues with the settings on their part. You'd think by now it would all be working well.

Does anyone know in what countries you actually get LTE as the option for the open world data?

A few Samsung phones received an update today and one of the enhancements was global roaming. Probably not for that issue but just an FYI.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Posted

It took a week for my phone to finally register on Movistar network in Mexico. After a few days I started a chat session with international help. I was told the first to verify my roaming settings (which I did to Sprint Int'l specifications when I landed). I told them I already did, nothing worked. Then she asked if I had wifi access and to update the profile. I tried to update the profile but authentication failed. She gave me the roaming setting instructions which I told her I've already done that multiple times to no avail. She asked if I had a good wifi signal which I barked back wifi has nothing at all to do with the phone not authenticating with the cellular network. Believe it or not, her reply was to recheck my roaming settings AGAIN. I said eff this and ended the session.

 

A couple more days later, I set my phone back to Global mode from UTMS/GSM and it registered with the network - which is exactly how Sprint told me *not* to do it.

 

The first time I was in Mexico I was charged for all of my calls under Open World. I did receive a credit but 2 out of 2 times traveling with Open World I have encountered problems. I'm not terribly impressed and will be looking for roaming charges on the next bill. I took some heat in the pre-trip meeting because I said I had a Sprint plan with free international coverage and didn't need a company phone. The other guys with their Verizon phones with no problem using it made me a look a little dumber (and I don't need any more help with that ;))

Posted

It took a week for my phone to finally register on Movistar network in Mexico. After a few days I started a chat session with international help. I was told the first to verify my roaming settings (which I did to Sprint Int'l specifications when I landed). I told them I already did, nothing worked. Then she asked if I had wifi access and to update the profile. I tried to update the profile but authentication failed. She gave me the roaming setting instructions which I told her I've already done that multiple times to no avail. She asked if I had a good wifi signal which I barked back wifi has nothing at all to do with the phone not authenticating with the cellular network. Believe it or not, her reply was to recheck my roaming settings AGAIN. I said eff this and ended the session.

 

A couple more days later, I set my phone back to Global mode from UTMS/GSM and it registered with the network - which is exactly how Sprint told me *not* to do it.

 

The first time I was in Mexico I was charged for all of my calls under Open World. I did receive a credit but 2 out of 2 times traveling with Open World I have encountered problems. I'm not terribly impressed and will be looking for roaming charges on the next bill. I took some heat in the pre-trip meeting because I said I had a Sprint plan with free international coverage and didn't need a company phone. The other guys with their Verizon phones with no problem using it made me a look a little dumber (and I don't need any more help with that ;))

I think they need to get some issues ironed out soon. I have only used the program in Brazil so far, but not too impressed with having to contact sprint twice regarding incoming calls not working realiable. They really need to get this fixed...
Posted

I looked at my usage so far.

 

. 1xxx gb international roaming data used out of 1 gb allowed

(x) international roaming text messages used out of unlimited

256 minutes of international roaming calls out of 0 allowed

 

*sigh*

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Went to Mexico last week. Connected to Movistar as soon as I exited airplane mode. I switched to GSM only and that was perfect as well, no extra battery drain.

 

In Chiapas, I connected to a Guatemala cell tower which was extremely fast. Also completely seamless.

 

The full speed experience was fantastic. Was able to use my cell normally as I would in the US. Google Maps, Yelp etc all worked perfectly. Much better than the unlimited 2G, although I did have to keep my eye on the data usage.

 

Oh, one interesting bit...when I switched to GSM, my android data usage thing reset to zero, so I had a perfect track of my GSM data usage. Fantastic!

 

 

Edit: Oh, one thing I found odd. All my text messages sent normally, but to make any phone calls from my contacts I had to go in and add the +1 to them so the call would go through. That is, when texting a US number, I did not have to edit the number at all, but to make a call, I had to manually add the +1.

 

Why is that?

  • Like 2
Posted

On another note, I just checked my bill and the Sharp Aquos was charged for a few texts and calls in Mexico. That makes no sense. That phone only works in Mexico on wi-fi calling because it doesnt have GSM - which is why it cant get Open World. Im going to have to call and clear up those charges ($3.50).

Posted

Went to Mexico last week. Connected to Movistar as soon as I exited airplane mode. I switched to GSM only and that was perfect as well, no extra battery drain.

 

In Chiapas, I connected to a Guatemala cell tower which was extremely fast. Also completely seamless.

 

The full speed experience was fantastic. Was able to use my cell normally as I would in the US. Google Maps, Yelp etc all worked perfectly. Much better than the unlimited 2G, although I did have to keep my eye on the data usage.

 

Oh, one interesting bit...when I switched to GSM, my android data usage thing reset to zero, so I had a perfect track of my GSM data usage. Fantastic!

 

 

Edit: Oh, one thing I found odd. All my text messages sent normally, but to make any phone calls from my contacts I had to go in and add the +1 to them so the call would go through. That is, when texting a US number, I did not have to edit the number at all, but to make a call, I had to manually add the +1.

 

Why is that?

Open World or Sprint Global Roaming?
Posted

On another note, I just checked my bill and the Sharp Aquos was charged for a few texts and calls in Mexico. That makes no sense. That phone only works in Mexico on wi-fi calling because it doesnt have GSM - which is why it cant get Open World. Im going to have to call and clear up those charges ($3.50).

 

Probably still some Iusacell CDMA broadcasting that it connected to.

Posted

Saw this on Reddit

 

 

Effective 12/21/15, all customers who have LTE GSM-capable devices will have Sprint Global Roaming enabled. Customers currently on another international roaming option will remain on what they have selected and will not have this available by default.

 

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sprint/comments/3vyive/sprint_global_roaming_update/

  • Like 3
Posted
And also my experience a few days ago.
 

Anyone experienced issues on the MXPE while using Open World?

 

This is the first time using my phone over in Mexico with Open World, previously had Global Roaming on my Moto X 1st Generation and had no issues. This weekend had to visit Mexico for a few hours and my phone took a while to connect to Movistar after turning off the phone a few times. Voice and text was working well but data was not registering as I had the exclamation mark show up. Support advised to go into settings and select the carrier "Movistar" manually in order to register data. After 2 tries, data started working fine. 

 

Under Cellular Networks> System Select you have to select Automatic and under preferred Network Type select Global and turn on data roaming.

 

I believe the MXPE is compatible with Movistars LTE but was connected to HSPA all the time.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Well you officially fried my brain. Many of these topics are well beyond my very rudimentary amateur knowledge.. this has my head spinning even more than usual. When someone figures it out, just let me know what I need to do with the app! 😂
    • Confusingly, there are two different types of Cell IDs, the NR Cell ID (NCI) and the Local Cell ID, which I will call the LCID from here on out. From my understanding, @Trip is trying to get the LCID from the NCI but the same gNB is showing up for multiple sites in the app. Some background for those that don’t know about NCIs (NR Cell ID) and how they relate to gNBs and LCIDs. Just like the E/GCI which is comprised of the eNB + LCID with the eNB denoting the site, the NCI is comprised of the gNB + LCID with the gNB denoting the site. A major difference is that the eNB is a fixed number of bits in the E/GCI but the gNB can vary between 22-32 bits (out of 36) in the NCI and there is nothing transmitted which tells you what the length is. The reason for the mentioning LTE sites is that Verizon’s gNB numbering scheme in most of the USA is based upon the sites eNB (using the rules I mentioned) and a 22-bit gNB. Additionally, their LCIDs start at 25 and increment by compinations of 16 and 1. Basically, it is common to see LCID sets of 25/26/27, 41/42/43, and 57/58/59. Looking at Trip’s data and some other data from the area, they are not following the format used in the rest of the USA.  From what I can tell, they are using a 29-bit or 30-bit gNB (that gives LCIDs that follow Verizon’s standard patterning). 29-bit shares the same gNB across the two locations, while 30-bit splits the two sets: 18504107674 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 26 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 26 (30-bit) 18504107690 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 42 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 42 (30-bit)  18504107691 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 43 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 43 (30-bit)  18504107706 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 58 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 58 (30-bit)  18504107707 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 59 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 59 (30-bit) 18504107738 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 90 (29-bit) or 289126683 + CLID 26 (30-bit)  18504107739 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 91 (29-bit) or 289126683 + CLID 27 (30-bit)  If true, this is a problem for SignalCheck and other mapping apps because this means they are using at least two different gNB lengths depending on the location in the USA.
    • Yeah I can confirm that the status bar is updating correctly and as often as the main app!  Great to have that back after so long. Waiting on the app to pick up the 5G data.  I'm on AT&T and I find that it only reports the 5G signal data a fraction of the time.  Once I can get it to pop back up I'll send a report with the LTE RSRP showing up in the status bar instead of the NR RSRP. I am not sure if it is new behavior with the Beta because I had it set to just show the Band since I couldn't display the band and signal at the same time. Edit:  Sent a diagnostic and here's a screenshot:
    • Yes, for various reasons the beta mapping project was limited to S4GRU sponsors at launch. It's still a work in progress but I have added a few users as it has evolved. I am inclined to leave it as-is for now -- it's not completely off-limits to discuss here (especially if there's an outage), but with so many posts I just try to keep discussions organized. RAvirani handles the map server and he monitors the other thread closer.   I might be confused, but are we talking apples and oranges here? My interpretation was Trip is talking about NR cells on different sites sharing cell IDs as far as the app is concerned, while the other comments are about LTE to NR cell ID calculations?
    • I hope this is true!! The Android development team did claim this bug was fixed several months ago, and it is typical for it to take several releases before changes are included. I was on the Android beta until I got my Pixel 9, now I am back on the public releases. With each monthly update, I have optimistically checked this icon and been disappointed. This would be fantastic to get back!   Could you send some diagnostic reports when you see this please? It is new behavior with QPR Beta 3?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...