Jump to content

Moto X 2015 "Pure Edition" [users thread]


nexuss4g

Recommended Posts

I guess....

 

That we currently cannot confirm active 2x CA on the 2015 Moto X, Nexus 5X, and Nexus 6P -- because all have engineering screens that are lacking and/or partially broken -- is disappointing.  But it is what it is.

 

Honestly, I wish that Sprint had not gone the CA route.  Just deploy as many 20 MHz TDD band 41 carriers as possible, then load balance.  The 2x CA, then 3x CA seems to be there just for e-penis bragging and RootMetrics testing in the ridiculous "arms race" among wireless operators.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed the nexus 6p had much higher bandwidth tests in my house , so I agree that it's not working.

It's nice when your downloading a large file.

 

Maybe it's fixed in 6.0 but I'm guessing not.

 

Yet, the Nexus 6P has an embarrassingly limited LTE engineering screen, so we cannot verify that 2x CA is active on it either.  And, in response, please do not cite speed tests.  They are not reliable and consume upwards of 100 MB of data -- we should not be running speed tests on "unlimited" data.  That is irresponsible, needless use of macro network resources.

 

In conclusion, the only things that definitively need to be fixed are the LTE engineering screens on the 2015 Moto X, Nexus 5X, and Nexus 6P.  However, they probably will not be fixed.  If 2x CA is enabled but working or not on any of those handsets, that is unproven.

 

And as for downloading a large file, why are you not on Wi-Fi?  What large file are you downloading on the cellular network?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marshmallow (6.0) OTA on the Moto X Pure does not seem to enable CA, but like AJ said, there is no way for us to confirm it is on or off.  That said, while running a (very rare for me) Speedtest.net test side-by-side with an "Ultimate Test Drive" Note 5, the the MXPE will hit ~20-24Mb/s while the Note 5 hit 60-65Mb/s while testing on the same server (Atlanta - Comcast) and SCP values are identical for the B41 connection.

 

It's nice to know that CA is enabled on the tower/site on our property, despite being in what is considered a rural area in NC.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone experienced issues on the MXPE while using Open World?

 

This is the first time using my phone over in Mexico with Open World, previously had Global Roaming on my Moto X 1st Generation and had no issues. This weekend had to visit Mexico for a few hours and my phone took a while to connect to Movistar after turning off the phone a few times. Voice and text was working well but data was not registering as I had the exclamation mark show up. Support advised to go into settings and select the carrier "Movistar" manually in order to register data. After 2 tries, data started working fine. 

 

Under Cellular Networks> System Select you have to select Automatic and under preferred Network Type select Global and turn on data roaming.

 

I believe the MXPE is compatible with Movistars LTE but was connected to HSPA all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife's MXPE on Verizon just showed the update to MM when I did a manual update check.

 

I've had Marshmallow on my MXPE for about a week and it definitely has some issues.  The Cell Standby bug is back.  It has used about 880mAh so far and my Screen on Time is only 43min and the BATT is down to 48% since being off the charger for about 13 hours.

 

Bluetooth is also back to draining the battery with my Moto 360 attached.  551mAh so far :(  This wasn't an issue prior to MM.  I may just factory reset to see if that clears some of these issues up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm trying to make my 64gb sd card part of my internal memory storage. It's not working....when I click format as internal, its stays at 30% and then times out with an error. I grabbed my 16gb sd card, tried the same steps and it worked right away. Both cards are SanDisk Ultra. Any idea what could be causing this? I've tried over 10 times and even formating from my PC, and putting it back on my phone.

 

Thanks.

 

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do I make sure when I buy an SD card that it's FAT32?

 

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

No no...

You should be able to reformat the exFAT SD card to FAT32 using a PC. If Windows doesn't achieve this task then track down a reformat utility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No no...

You should be able to reformat the exFAT SD card to FAT32 using a PC. If Windows doesn't achieve this task then track down a reformat utility.

Yes windows will not allow to formart anything higher than 32gb to FAT32. I just read it in another forum. I would need a 3rd party app to make it happen.

 

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Motorola support tells me that CA is NOT supported..

 

 

And you trust Motorola support to know anything about carrier aggregation?  Pardon me while I keel over laughing.  That is like asking Sprint customer service about Network Vision site completion.  It is naive to think that entry level workers know what you want to know.

 

Maybe the 2015 Moto X truly is broken, does not support 2x CA on band 41, and will not get fixed.  But I would not take the word of Motorola support on anything that technical.  Instead, I will go with the authorization lab testing that Motorola submitted to the FCC:

 

1182ik4.png

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...