Jump to content

Google Nexus 5X by LG (codename "Bullhead")


PythonFanPA

Recommended Posts

I'm much more concerned about the battery life rumored for the new nexus 5. Still under 3000.

 

Sent from my XT1030 using Tapatalk

 

Agreed.  TBH the Nexus 5 battery should be above 3000 maH.  I could care less about an extra 0.1 or 0.2 mm thicker to have a beefier battery.  A 3300 maH battery would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's LG with their improved camera & decent battery size, I shall be getting this to replace my N5.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing that might lure me away from my Nexus 5 would be a huge battery. That has been my only disappointment with the phone, but Android M is a lot better on battery so far than Lollipop so I may be holding onto my Nexus 5 for another cycle. Every phone I have bought has been to upgrade RF features, I'm hoping the 2015 Nexus 5 doesn't disappoint in that department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My wife and I have been holding onto our G2's as they have been excellent phones and we don't really want to go to a bigger size of the G3/4. A 5.2" Nexus would be a dream come true especially if it includes all the roaming LTE bands and CA.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I have been holding onto our G2's as they have been excellent phones and we don't really want to go to a bigger size of the G3/4. A 5.2" Nexus would be a dream come true especially if it includes all the roaming LTE bands and CA.

 

I am in the same boat as you man in terms of having the G2 currently and looking to upgrade.  Since my 2 year upgrade isn't up until Oct, this will probably be my first time I am looking at buying a Nexus device this time.  I am hoping it does stay true to the 5.2 inch screen and hopefully it comes with a USB type-C port.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I have been holding onto our G2's as they have been excellent phones and we don't really want to go to a bigger size of the G3/4. A 5.2" Nexus would be a dream come true especially if it includes all the roaming LTE bands and CA.

 

Comprehensive LTE band coverage is guaranteed -- because the combination of AT&T and T-Mobile will require bands 4/5/12.  Band 41 CA is no given, however.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comprehensive LTE band coverage is guaranteed -- because the combination of AT&T and T-Mobile will require bands 4/5/12.  Band 41 CA is no given, however.

 

AJ

I have a good feeling it'll support B41 CA, because the last variant supported the other carriers CA.  But, I'm only assuming.  The whole "I missed out" on the latest network tech is usually those on the Note line.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a good feeling it'll support B41 CA, because the last variant supported the other carriers CA.

 

Other domestic operators' CA is a different animal -- inter band CA between low band and mid band spectrum.  Sprint is the only one pursuing intra band CA, and it is in high band spectrum.  So, in a jack of all trades Nexus handset, do not rule out Sprint capable CA, but certainly do not count on it.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other domestic operators' CA is a different animal -- inter band CA between low band and mid band spectrum. Sprint is the only one pursuing intra band CA, and it is in high band spectrum. So, in a jack of all trades Nexus handset, do not rule out Sprint capable CA, but certainly do not count on it.

 

AJ

Wouldn't it essentially be easier to aggregate a single band rather than two separate bands? I mean, the signal levels should be exactly the same, coming from the same panel and all.

 

Sent from my M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't it essentially be easier to aggregate a single band rather than two separate bands?

Not if the two intra band carriers require separate RF transceiver ports. And not when the two carriers exceed 20 MHz of aggregated bandwidth. The first may be an issue. The second definitely has been a limitation.

 

I mean, the signal levels should be exactly the same, coming from the same panel and all.

You might be surprised. The signal levels between the two carriers may be close, but they rarely will be exactly the same.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing that might lure me away from my Nexus 5 would be a huge battery. That has been my only disappointment with the phone, but Android M is a lot better on battery so far than Lollipop so I may be holding onto my Nexus 5 for another cycle. Every phone I have bought has been to upgrade RF features, I'm hoping the 2015 Nexus 5 doesn't disappoint in that department.

LG and Nexus constantly do very well in regards to RF performance so, unless it turns out to be a lemon, I don't think we will have to worry about suffering in the RF department. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG and Nexus constantly do very well in regards to RF performance so, unless it turns out to be a lemon, I don't think we will have to worry about suffering in the RF department. 

From what I hear, the N5 was only good on Sprint, RF-wise.  I hear complaints about it from T-Mobile and AT&T users.  Especially AT&T users.  Odd, because I only hear complaints from Sprint users regarding the Nexus 6. Something about texts failing over LTE or of the like.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MMS fail over LTE for my wife and I all the time on our G2s. A toggle of airplane mode is often required for the image to download. I assume it is a Sprint issue not a handset issue because it affects both of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I hear, the N5 was only good on Sprint, RF-wise. I hear complaints about it from T-Mobile and AT&T users. Especially AT&T users. Odd, because I only hear complaints from Sprint users regarding the Nexus 6. Something about texts failing over LTE or of the like.

Well, technically the N5 is not an officially supported device by at&t so that might be one reason it's not the best on that network.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG and Nexus constantly do very well in regards to RF performance so, unless it turns out to be a lemon, I don't think we will have to worry about suffering in the RF department.

While RF performance is important to me, my upgrades have been for actual radio changes. My first real upgrade was to get evdo rev.a, then wimax, then lte, then triband. I don't know if I'll upgrade just for 2x CA on band 41 if that's all the new nexus has.

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While RF performance is important to me, my upgrades have been for actual radio changes. My first real upgrade was to get evdo rev.a, then wimax, then lte, then triband. I don't know if I'll upgrade just for 2x CA on band 41 if that's all the new nexus has.

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

I understand, and that certainly makes sense to me.  The only additional thought I have is, just keep in mind that it doesn't matter what radio tech you have if it has poor RF performance.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand, and that certainly makes sense to me. The only additional thought I have is, just keep in mind that it doesn't matter what radio tech you have if it has poor RF performance.

For sure, that was one of the main factors when I bought my nexus 5. So many were posting about it being a RF powerhouse, I bought it much sooner than I had planned. I was going to hold out until other lte bands were deployed in my area.

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My N5 on AT&T works great. Data, voice, mms, texts - all reliable & fast. I connect to band 2, 4, and 17 & hardly ever fall down to HSPA.

 

I wish LG would quickly officially confirm or deny the N5 so I can begin planning.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

From what I hear, the N5 was only good on Sprint, RF-wise. I hear complaints about it from T-Mobile and AT&T users. Especially AT&T users. Odd, because I only hear complaints from Sprint users regarding the Nexus 6. Something about texts failing over LTE or of the like.

My Nexus 5 on AT&T was solid, except on the Cellular band WCDMA. Where it was acceptable, but not as good as PCS/AWS. LTE on the Cellular band was fine, though.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Specs leak!

 

http://www.gizmochina.com/2015/08/03/google-nexus-5-huawei-nexus-specs-leaked/

 

The buzz is Snapdragon 620 using new ARM cores, cortex A72. Camera f/1.8, laser autofocus, OIS. USB type C.

 

I think this sounds pretty great.

From what I'm hearing, the SD 620 should have similar performance to the SD 810, minus the heat. :P  Makes me wonder how well the 820 will be late this year/early next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read those specs came accross the original on Reddit. They sound so perfect of balance its hard to believe this would be possible at a 400 dollar price point. It would legit be the best all around device from a specifications stand point released this year. I would not complain. But I am suspect and really dont want to get my hope up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Specs leak!

 

http://www.gizmochina.com/2015/08/03/google-nexus-5-huawei-nexus-specs-leaked/

 

The buzz is Snapdragon 620 using new ARM cores, cortex A72. Camera f/1.8, laser autofocus, OIS. USB type C.

 

I think this sounds pretty great.

 

That sounds a bit too good to be true.  Apparently the commenters on that article seem to agree.  If it is true, I don't care at all about the price, it will be mine.  

 

I've said several times over that I'm done with Samsung BUT I do love a good camera, which the Nexus' have lacked.  If they actually use that LG camera module then I'm willing to trade off the sealed up battery (my other real bugaboo), for Nexus bloat-free-ness and fast updates (why I skipped the G4).  I'm giving up on water resistance, it seems crazy that more people don't demand that from their devices, but whatever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...