Jump to content

Google Nexus 5X by LG (codename "Bullhead")


PythonFanPA

Recommended Posts

I'm much more concerned about the battery life rumored for the new nexus 5. Still under 3000.

 

Sent from my XT1030 using Tapatalk

 

Agreed.  TBH the Nexus 5 battery should be above 3000 maH.  I could care less about an extra 0.1 or 0.2 mm thicker to have a beefier battery.  A 3300 maH battery would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's LG with their improved camera & decent battery size, I shall be getting this to replace my N5.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing that might lure me away from my Nexus 5 would be a huge battery. That has been my only disappointment with the phone, but Android M is a lot better on battery so far than Lollipop so I may be holding onto my Nexus 5 for another cycle. Every phone I have bought has been to upgrade RF features, I'm hoping the 2015 Nexus 5 doesn't disappoint in that department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My wife and I have been holding onto our G2's as they have been excellent phones and we don't really want to go to a bigger size of the G3/4. A 5.2" Nexus would be a dream come true especially if it includes all the roaming LTE bands and CA.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I have been holding onto our G2's as they have been excellent phones and we don't really want to go to a bigger size of the G3/4. A 5.2" Nexus would be a dream come true especially if it includes all the roaming LTE bands and CA.

 

I am in the same boat as you man in terms of having the G2 currently and looking to upgrade.  Since my 2 year upgrade isn't up until Oct, this will probably be my first time I am looking at buying a Nexus device this time.  I am hoping it does stay true to the 5.2 inch screen and hopefully it comes with a USB type-C port.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I have been holding onto our G2's as they have been excellent phones and we don't really want to go to a bigger size of the G3/4. A 5.2" Nexus would be a dream come true especially if it includes all the roaming LTE bands and CA.

 

Comprehensive LTE band coverage is guaranteed -- because the combination of AT&T and T-Mobile will require bands 4/5/12.  Band 41 CA is no given, however.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comprehensive LTE band coverage is guaranteed -- because the combination of AT&T and T-Mobile will require bands 4/5/12.  Band 41 CA is no given, however.

 

AJ

I have a good feeling it'll support B41 CA, because the last variant supported the other carriers CA.  But, I'm only assuming.  The whole "I missed out" on the latest network tech is usually those on the Note line.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a good feeling it'll support B41 CA, because the last variant supported the other carriers CA.

 

Other domestic operators' CA is a different animal -- inter band CA between low band and mid band spectrum.  Sprint is the only one pursuing intra band CA, and it is in high band spectrum.  So, in a jack of all trades Nexus handset, do not rule out Sprint capable CA, but certainly do not count on it.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other domestic operators' CA is a different animal -- inter band CA between low band and mid band spectrum. Sprint is the only one pursuing intra band CA, and it is in high band spectrum. So, in a jack of all trades Nexus handset, do not rule out Sprint capable CA, but certainly do not count on it.

 

AJ

Wouldn't it essentially be easier to aggregate a single band rather than two separate bands? I mean, the signal levels should be exactly the same, coming from the same panel and all.

 

Sent from my M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't it essentially be easier to aggregate a single band rather than two separate bands?

Not if the two intra band carriers require separate RF transceiver ports. And not when the two carriers exceed 20 MHz of aggregated bandwidth. The first may be an issue. The second definitely has been a limitation.

 

I mean, the signal levels should be exactly the same, coming from the same panel and all.

You might be surprised. The signal levels between the two carriers may be close, but they rarely will be exactly the same.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing that might lure me away from my Nexus 5 would be a huge battery. That has been my only disappointment with the phone, but Android M is a lot better on battery so far than Lollipop so I may be holding onto my Nexus 5 for another cycle. Every phone I have bought has been to upgrade RF features, I'm hoping the 2015 Nexus 5 doesn't disappoint in that department.

LG and Nexus constantly do very well in regards to RF performance so, unless it turns out to be a lemon, I don't think we will have to worry about suffering in the RF department. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG and Nexus constantly do very well in regards to RF performance so, unless it turns out to be a lemon, I don't think we will have to worry about suffering in the RF department. 

From what I hear, the N5 was only good on Sprint, RF-wise.  I hear complaints about it from T-Mobile and AT&T users.  Especially AT&T users.  Odd, because I only hear complaints from Sprint users regarding the Nexus 6. Something about texts failing over LTE or of the like.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MMS fail over LTE for my wife and I all the time on our G2s. A toggle of airplane mode is often required for the image to download. I assume it is a Sprint issue not a handset issue because it affects both of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I hear, the N5 was only good on Sprint, RF-wise. I hear complaints about it from T-Mobile and AT&T users. Especially AT&T users. Odd, because I only hear complaints from Sprint users regarding the Nexus 6. Something about texts failing over LTE or of the like.

Well, technically the N5 is not an officially supported device by at&t so that might be one reason it's not the best on that network.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG and Nexus constantly do very well in regards to RF performance so, unless it turns out to be a lemon, I don't think we will have to worry about suffering in the RF department.

While RF performance is important to me, my upgrades have been for actual radio changes. My first real upgrade was to get evdo rev.a, then wimax, then lte, then triband. I don't know if I'll upgrade just for 2x CA on band 41 if that's all the new nexus has.

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While RF performance is important to me, my upgrades have been for actual radio changes. My first real upgrade was to get evdo rev.a, then wimax, then lte, then triband. I don't know if I'll upgrade just for 2x CA on band 41 if that's all the new nexus has.

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

I understand, and that certainly makes sense to me.  The only additional thought I have is, just keep in mind that it doesn't matter what radio tech you have if it has poor RF performance.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand, and that certainly makes sense to me. The only additional thought I have is, just keep in mind that it doesn't matter what radio tech you have if it has poor RF performance.

For sure, that was one of the main factors when I bought my nexus 5. So many were posting about it being a RF powerhouse, I bought it much sooner than I had planned. I was going to hold out until other lte bands were deployed in my area.

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My N5 on AT&T works great. Data, voice, mms, texts - all reliable & fast. I connect to band 2, 4, and 17 & hardly ever fall down to HSPA.

 

I wish LG would quickly officially confirm or deny the N5 so I can begin planning.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

From what I hear, the N5 was only good on Sprint, RF-wise. I hear complaints about it from T-Mobile and AT&T users. Especially AT&T users. Odd, because I only hear complaints from Sprint users regarding the Nexus 6. Something about texts failing over LTE or of the like.

My Nexus 5 on AT&T was solid, except on the Cellular band WCDMA. Where it was acceptable, but not as good as PCS/AWS. LTE on the Cellular band was fine, though.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Specs leak!

 

http://www.gizmochina.com/2015/08/03/google-nexus-5-huawei-nexus-specs-leaked/

 

The buzz is Snapdragon 620 using new ARM cores, cortex A72. Camera f/1.8, laser autofocus, OIS. USB type C.

 

I think this sounds pretty great.

From what I'm hearing, the SD 620 should have similar performance to the SD 810, minus the heat. :P  Makes me wonder how well the 820 will be late this year/early next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read those specs came accross the original on Reddit. They sound so perfect of balance its hard to believe this would be possible at a 400 dollar price point. It would legit be the best all around device from a specifications stand point released this year. I would not complain. But I am suspect and really dont want to get my hope up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Specs leak!

 

http://www.gizmochina.com/2015/08/03/google-nexus-5-huawei-nexus-specs-leaked/

 

The buzz is Snapdragon 620 using new ARM cores, cortex A72. Camera f/1.8, laser autofocus, OIS. USB type C.

 

I think this sounds pretty great.

 

That sounds a bit too good to be true.  Apparently the commenters on that article seem to agree.  If it is true, I don't care at all about the price, it will be mine.  

 

I've said several times over that I'm done with Samsung BUT I do love a good camera, which the Nexus' have lacked.  If they actually use that LG camera module then I'm willing to trade off the sealed up battery (my other real bugaboo), for Nexus bloat-free-ness and fast updates (why I skipped the G4).  I'm giving up on water resistance, it seems crazy that more people don't demand that from their devices, but whatever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...