Jump to content

Sprint Organic Network Expansion Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

I think the 20,000 number that the Fierce source references includes Clearwire sites that Sprint is keeping and not decommissioning. An inadvertent double up of numbers. I was solely focusing on new site adds to the network. S4GRU already counts all the existing unique Clearwire sites in our totals. So I just see the Fierce article as further corroboration to our story.

 

I was actually given exact numbers of sites, but rounded the numbers to protect my source. Since the numbers are always in flux, by a few sites here and a few sites there, if I used the exact numbers it would clue Sprint on exactly the date the info was provided, allowing for easier discoverability of who provided the info. But it is right around 9,000 total.

 

Not to say Sprint couldn't expand it further. By my estimate, 9,000 new macro sites would be around $2B-$3B. Since ~3,000 of them are gong to be small cells, that number could be even lower. I have no idea how much small cell sites cost each.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the 20,000 number that the Fierce source references includes Clearwire sites that Sprint is keeping and not decommissioning. An inadvertent double up of numbers. I was solely focusing on new site adds to the network. S4GRU already counts all the existing unique Clearwire sites in our totals. So I just see the Fierce article as further corroboration to our story.

 

I was actually given exact numbers of sites, but rounded the numbers to protect my source. Since the numbers are always in flux, by a few sites here and a few sites there, if I used the exact numbers it would clue Sprint on exactly the date the info was provided, allowing for easier discoverability of who provided the info. But it is right around 9,000 total.

 

Not to say Sprint couldn't expand it further. By my estimate, 9,000 new macro sites would be around $2B-$3B. Since ~3,000 of them are gong to be small cells, that number could be even lower. I have no idea how much small cell sites cost each.

Small cells cost $2-3k a pop each but because they're so compact and low profile you don't have to drag it through city zoning or permitting and etc or need people with extensive training to install it as they're plug and play.

 

In comparison,a typical network vision antenna or 2.5 antenna cost $3000-$5000 each alone.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small cells cost $2-3k a pop each but because they're so compact and low profile you don't have to drag it through city zoning or permitting and etc or need people with extensive training to install it as they're plug and play.

 

In comparison,a typical network vision antenna or 2.5 antenna cost $3000-$5000 each alone.

No permits needed? Really? That's good to hear for sf.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No permits needed? Really? That's good to hear for sf.

 

Look up at your light poles and gaze upon the hundreds of small cells deployed by cable co for public wifi and verizon that was never discovered in building permits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Small cells cost $2-3k a pop each but because they're so compact and low profile you don't have to drag it through city zoning or permitting and etc or need people with extensive training to install it as they're plug and play.

 

In comparison,a typical network vision antenna or 2.5 antenna cost $3000-$5000 each alone.

In a macro site (at an existing tower/site), equipment cost is about 1/4 of the total cost of a new site. Then other 3/4 is install labor, design/planning and backhaul. So if we take $4,000 and quadruple it, we come out to around $16,000. Which is a steal to a macro site which runs $100-$250k depending on types and locations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look up at your light poles and gaze upon the hundreds of small cells deployed by cable co for public wifi and verizon that was never discovered in building permits.

Yeah I att has a ton of small cells here in sf. And Verizon just announced they are launching a ton of them. I thought they all had permits. http://www.engadget.com/2015/02/21/verizon-small-cell-san-francisco/

 

Bring it on Sprint bring it on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to know what Sprint plans to do with Clear sites in cities like Las Vegas, where the old Motorola equipemt was not used in a dual network conversion. B41 was build on new 8T8R radios only. Will Sprint retain all towers or select the best and let the rest go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to know what Sprint plans to do with Clear sites in cities like Las Vegas, where the old Motorola equipemt was not used in a dual network conversion. B41 was build on new 8T8R radios only. Will Sprint retain all towers or select the best and let the rest go?

 

This I know the answer to this.  ALU will switch out Motorola equipment to their own at most non-colocated sites.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to know what Sprint plans to do with Clear sites in cities like Las Vegas, where the old Motorola equipemt was not used in a dual network conversion. B41 was build on new 8T8R radios only. Will Sprint retain all towers or select the best and let the rest go?

 

 

This I know the answer to this.  ALU will switch out Motorola equipment to their own at most non-colocated sites.

 

ALU has already filed for a Clearwire conversion to a full build Sprint site in Las Vegas. The first one is on top of The Westin on East Flamingo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This I know the answer to this.  ALU will switch out Motorola equipment to their own at most non-colocated sites.

 

That would be nice because I know of 4-5 Clearwire sites that are very close to current Sprint sites.

 

ALU has already filed for a Clearwire conversion to a full build Sprint site in Las Vegas. The first one is on top of The Westin on East Flamingo.

 

Clear was never very good around the strip but it should help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be nice because I know of 4-5 Clearwire sites that are very close to current Sprint sites.

 

 

Clear was never very good around the strip but it should help.

 

As I'm looking, I'm finding a lot of Clear sites that could be converted to Sprint sites for massive fill in in the Las Vegas Valley.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dang they're gonna surpass TMO with num sites

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Possibly, but unlikely. All carriers are adding small cells with pretty good fury. AT&T will have added close to 40,000 small cells during 2014-2015. Verizon just started adding them at a rapid clip, and T-Mobile has said they are going gung-ho on small cells this year too.

 

If 5,000 of the 9,000 are small cells, that's only 4,000 incremental macros...which isn't going to allow Sprint to surpass T-Mobile's 50k+ macros (and counting) anytime soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a macro site (at an existing tower/site), equipment cost is about 1/4 of the total cost of a new site. Then other 3/4 is install labor, design/planning and backhaul. So if we take $4,000 and quadruple it, we come out to around $16,000. Which is a steal to a macro site which runs $100-$250k depending on types and locations.

By that math, sounds like everyone should just use small cells going forward.

What's the downside?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibly, but unlikely. All carriers are adding small cells with pretty good fury. AT&T will have added close to 40,000 small cells during 2014-2015. Verizon just started adding them at a rapid clip, and T-Mobile has said they are going gung-ho on small cells this year too.

 

If 5,000 of the 9,000 are small cells, that's only 4,000 incremental macros...which isn't going to allow Sprint to surpass T-Mobile's 50k+ macros (and counting) anytime soon. 

 

Link on the AT&T numbers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that but if it takes less $/acre using small cels …

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You can sure as hell try but good luck having a dozen small cells try and cover multi mile radius zones when theyre designed to cover a few hundred meters.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By that math, sounds like everyone should just use small cells going forward.

What's the downside?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

It would take dozens to cover a macro site.  Macro sites can handle more carriers and frequencies.  If the math shifts to where small cells provide a solution superior to macros, it will change.  And the technology may improve costs for macros, or small cells.  It's not currently there, though.  And it may never get there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link on the AT&T numbers?

 

Google? Haha. But, seriously, this is old news. 

 

Here's one: http://ipcarrier.blogspot.com/2013/11/at-to-deploy-40000-small-cells-as-part.html

 

AT&T said on their recent conference call they are ahead of schedule. And it's 40,000 small cells and 10,000 new macros for Project VIP (the 2014-2015 network investment)

 

The point is that Sprint's investment is very welcome--and will help a great deal---but it's not going to alter the landscape materially when their competitors are doing even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...