Jump to content

Talked to a guy who claimed to work on Sprint towers today


greencat

Recommended Posts

Wow. What an eye opening conversation. This all recollected to the best of my abilities.

 

1. He works on Sprint, tmobile, and verizon towers.

2. He works for ericson

3. Sprint is deploying "6500 mhz service" i asked if he meant 2600 and he said no, that was already done.

4. Said it takes 6 months to a year for them to do a site survey when a company wants to add new equipment to a tower.

5. He go into the numbers that a rep for a particular company might be responsible for and tmobile reps can have up to 160 towers. he has 20.

6. Sprint constantly screws up and this guy will be surprised if theyre still around in 2 years.

7. He thought sprint should've bought tmobile and it wouldve been the best company.

8. In many areas where sprint has weak service due to poor tower density tough luck, it isnt going to get any better.

9. He said Att and Verizon dont even have to train their guys because as soon as a Sprint guy is trained he'll leave for another company.

10. Said he's eligible for retirement at the end of this year.

 

Obviously he was confused on a few of his points. But it was interesting still. Did seem to have decent knowledge of the site spacing issues and new tower construction snags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. What an eye opening conversation. This all recollected to the best of my abilities.

 

1. He works on Sprint, tmobile, and verizon towers.

2. He works for ericson

3. Sprint is deploying "6500 mhz service" i asked if he meant 2600 and he said no, that was already done.

The "6500 MHz" project is the new RRU from Ericsson. They are swapping out the old PCS RRUs for the new RRUS31s, leaving the SMR RRUs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2. He works for ericson

 

 

:rofl:  :roflmao:

 

How about Ericsson doing something right like not getting nearly half of its network infrustructure replaced immediately after they deployed it, fix up their performance management software that they spent a year failing to properly implement, and do proper site maintainence / deployment/ integration and comissioning work so they don't constantly send another team out later to fix it. 

 

The "6500 MHz" project is the new RRU from Ericsson. They are swapping out the old PCS RRUs for the new RRUS31s, leaving the SMR RRUs.

 

It includes replacing DULs and software updates to the BTE. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I talked to a guy contracted out for ericsson changing to 31 ruus. It took them 6 weeks to change them out for some reason. He told me that no one likes working on Sprint towers and that Ericsson has not been spending money as of late. He said they are low on work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. What an eye opening conversation. This all recollected to the best of my abilities.

 

1. He works on Sprint, tmobile, and verizon towers.

2. He works for ericson

3. Sprint is deploying "6500 mhz service" i asked if he meant 2600 and he said no, that was already done.

4. Said it takes 6 months to a year for them to do a site survey when a company wants to add new equipment to a tower.

5. He go into the numbers that a rep for a particular company might be responsible for and tmobile reps can have up to 160 towers. he has 20.

6. Sprint constantly screws up and this guy will be surprised if theyre still around in 2 years.

7. He thought sprint should've bought tmobile and it wouldve been the best company.

8. In many areas where sprint has weak service due to poor tower density tough luck, it isnt going to get any better.

9. He said Att and Verizon dont even have to train their guys because as soon as a Sprint guy is trained he'll leave for another company.

10. Said he's eligible for retirement at the end of this year.

 

Obviously he was confused on a few of his points. But it was interesting still. Did seem to have decent knowledge of the site spacing issues and new tower construction snags.

I know someone personally who works specifically on cell phone towers, mainly Vzw though but he does occasionally work on some Sprint.... There are thousands of people across the United States that work on cell phone towers I mean its not THAT unheard of for someone on here to know someone or talk to someone (run into) that can tell us stuff. Just saying!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, wait, Sprint constantly screws up and would be out of business in two years, but if they bought T-Mobile they'd be the best company?  Am I missing something or do those two points conflict?

 

- Trip

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, wait, Sprint constantly screws up and would be out of business in two years, but if they bought T-Mobile they'd be the best company?  Am I missing something or do those two points conflict?

 

- Trip

I read somewhere if Legree had his way he would ditch the Sprint name and make it T-mobile. I would have to look to see where I saw that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally know an Ericsson employee (Network Technician) he keeps everything running in my area from Johnson City, Kingsport, and Bristol to Atkins, VA roughly 200+ sites.  He came from Sprint's network management team before Sprint handed network maintenance over to Ericsson.  He has said nothing but good things about Sprint when it comes to their network especially Sprint's LTE network which will closely match Verizon's 700 LTE network once 800 has been completed fully and optimized according to him.  He explained that Sprint's site density in their mature markets beat Verizon's due to Sprint's 1900 PCS spacing setup coupled with 800 being on the same 1900 sites will provide for dense LTE coverage.   

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally know an Ericsson employee (Network Technician) he keeps everything running in my area from Johnson City, Kingsport, and Bristol to Atkins, VA roughly 200+ sites.  He came from Sprint's network management team before Sprint handed network maintenance over to Ericsson.  He has said nothing but good things about Sprint when it comes to their network especially Sprint's LTE network which will closely match Verizon's 700 LTE network once 800 has been completed fully and optimized according to him.  He explained that Sprint's site density in their mature markets beat Verizon's due to Sprint's 1900 PCS spacing setup coupled with 800 being on the same 1900 sites will provide for dense LTE coverage.   

good!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally know an Ericsson employee (Network Technician) he keeps everything running in my area from Johnson City, Kingsport, and Bristol to Atkins, VA roughly 200+ sites.  He came from Sprint's network management team before Sprint handed network maintenance over to Ericsson.  He has said nothing but good things about Sprint when it comes to their network especially Sprint's LTE network which will closely match Verizon's 700 LTE network once 800 has been completed fully and optimized according to him.  He explained that Sprint's site density in their mature markets beat Verizon's due to Sprint's 1900 PCS spacing setup coupled with 800 being on the same 1900 sites will provide for dense LTE coverage.   

Is there a market that has 800 optimized? We have 800 up and running here but its really weird. Meaning i can be on 25 @-110, the next minute 26@-109 then the next b41@-114 .. all without moving the phone??

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a market that has 800 optimized? We have 800 up and running here but its really weird. Meaning i can be on 25 @-110, the next minute 26@-109 then the next b41@-114 .. all without moving the phone??

I'm sure mature markets like Chicago have had a lot of site optimizations, LTE 800 optimization has been occurring here for the last couple of weeks.  Initially when LTE 800 was turned on here I would get around a -102dBm connection with PCS LTE closely matching that, now LTE 800 sits around -88dBm almost matching my EV-DO connection in signal strength.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure mature markets like Chicago have had a lot of site optimizations, LTE 800 optimization has been occurring here for the last couple of weeks.  Initially when LTE 800 was turned on here I would get around a -102dBm connection with PCS LTE closely matching that, now LTE 800 sits around -88dBm almost matching my EV-DO connection in signal strength.  

Thats good news!!! I was getting worried.. I wonder if there is a reason they dont optimize a market faster?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6. Sprint constantly screws up and this guy will be surprised if theyre still around in 2 years.

 

 

I seem to recall we had a post around here from 2012 from a member who met up with an Ericsson employee in the field who said he would be surprised if Sprint would be around in two years.  Makes me wonder if it's the same guy?  :)

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally know an Ericsson employee (Network Technician) he keeps everything running in my area from Johnson City, Kingsport, and Bristol to Atkins, VA roughly 200+ sites. He came from Sprint's network management team before Sprint handed network maintenance over to Ericsson. He has said nothing but good things about Sprint when it comes to their network especially Sprint's LTE network which will closely match Verizon's 700 LTE network once 800 has been completed fully and optimized according to him. He explained that Sprint's site density in their mature markets beat Verizon's due to Sprint's 1900 PCS spacing setup coupled with 800 being on the same 1900 sites will provide for dense LTE coverage.

That's great I can't wait until they finish in my area

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...