Jump to content

LG G Flex 2 [FCC ID ZNFLS996]


NateC

Recommended Posts

Well, something disappointing to many of us. It appears the US Cellular version was approved by the FCC OET on Thursday. Only Band 25 LTE is included. They even stripped CDMA BC10 from it.

 

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=922265&fcc_id=ZNFUS995

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The intrigued builds. But it seems a deal may not be in place! For any roaming partnership. Sad news if we are to use degice radio support as a precursor of events to come or not come to pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, something disappointing to many of us. It appears the US Cellular version was approved by the FCC OET on Thursday. Only Band 25 LTE is included. They even stripped CDMA BC10 from it.

 

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=922265&fcc_id=ZNFUS995

 

Man, US Cellular doesn't want to play ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, something disappointing to many of us. It appears the US Cellular version was approved by the FCC OET on Thursday. Only Band 25 LTE is included. They even stripped CDMA BC10 from it.

 

Too bad for USCC.  But how should this be any concern for Sprint?  Are we to cry tears for USCC subs?

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a Sprint sub and it concerns me. USCC roaming for Sprint customers would significantly enhance my Sprint experience in my area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a Sprint sub and it concerns me. USCC roaming for Sprint customers would significantly enhance my Sprint experience in my area.

 

You may be missing the point.  This discussion has turned to a USCC variant handset, not a Sprint variant handset.  The issue here has no bearing on roaming agreements, only on roaming capabilities for a specific device -- which, again, is a USCC variant.  The Sprint variant is fully CCA/RRPP compliant.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, something disappointing to many of us. It appears the US Cellular version was approved by the FCC OET on Thursday. Only Band 25 LTE is included. They even stripped CDMA BC10 from it.

Do USCC-branded devices still support SVLTE rather than eCSFB? That may explain the omission of B41/TDD LTE, although I can't imagine why they'd cut out anything else.

 

Too bad for USCC. But how should this be any concern for Sprint? Are we to cry tears for USCC subs?

Wasn't a "device hub" part of the Roaming Hub plans with the CCA/RRPP members? As Verizon begins to exit the CDMA ecosystem and go (Vo)LTE only, it'll be important for Sprint, USCC, C Spire, and all of the others still operating & supporting a CDMA network to "band" together to both keep device costs down, and to encourage reciprocal roaming agreements.

 

So if a G Flex 2 or another 2015 flagship costs me a bit more (even if Sprint chooses to eat that cost rather than spend it on their network) just because USCC is being stubborn, I won't shed any tears, but I would find it rather irksome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do USCC-branded devices still support SVLTE rather than eCSFB? That may explain the omission of B41/TDD LTE, although I can't imagine why they'd cut out anything else.

 

Single Transmission path for CDMA/LTE. No SVLTE on this phone. USCC just still isn't ready to join the CCA/RRPP program. I'm kinda surprised, because the program is really an advantage for any small carrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may be missing the point. This discussion has turned to a USCC variant handset, not a Sprint variant handset. The issue here has no bearing on roaming agreements, only on roaming capabilities for a specific device -- which, again, is a USCC variant. The Sprint variant is fully CCA/RRPP compliant.

 

AJ

I understand that. The point was (as I read it anyway) that the evidence of a USCC variant of the Flex 2 that didn't include CCA bands could be interpreted to mean that USCC wasn't planning on joining the CCA. If that interpretation ends up being correct then that is bad news for this Sprint subscriber.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't a "device hub" part of the Roaming Hub plans with the CCA/RRPP members? As Verizon begins to exit the CDMA ecosystem and go (Vo)LTE only, it'll be important for Sprint, USCC, C Spire, and all of the others still operating & supporting a CDMA network to "band" together to both keep device costs down, and to encourage reciprocal roaming agreements.

 

I am not worried.

 

USCC has gone its own way on handsets for the past few years and has had seemingly little trouble procuring the band class 0/1 and band 2/4/5/12 variants it needs for its network.

 

The CCA/RRPP "hub" likely matters more to the truly small, rural operators -- whose subs are measured in thousands, not millions.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that. The point was (as I read it anyway) that the evidence of a USCC variant of the Flex 2 that didn't include CCA bands could be interpreted to mean that USCC wasn't planning on joining the CCA. If that interpretation ends up being correct then that is bad news for this Sprint subscriber.

 

Uh, it does include CCA/RRPP bands:  bands 4/5/12/25(2).  Those are the LTE bands that matter to USCC and CCA/RRPP partners.

 

Just because this USCC variant does not support bands 26/41 is no cause for concern.

 

If anything, that is good news.  Roamers should not be allowed on band class 10, nor on bands 26/41.  Those should be reserved for actual Sprint subs.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, it does include CCA/RRPP bands:  bands 4/5/12/25(2).  Those are the LTE bands that matter to USCC and CCA/RRPP partners.

 

Just because this USCC variant does not support bands 26/41 is no cause for concern.

 

If anything, that is good news.  Roamers should not be allowed on band class 10, nor on bands 26/41.  Those should be reserved for actual Sprint subs.

 

AJ

 

The USCC variant also specifically mentions Band 17 inclusion, so is an AT&T or Rogers roaming agreement in the works, or this was just a customary filing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes!!!! I hope all 2015 Sprint LTE phones contain LTE bands 2, 4, 5 and 12 to be compatible with AT&T, Verizon and Tmobile networks.

Almost all.. Verizon's original 700 MHz B13 LTE network would remain left out. Their overlay B2 & B4 networks would theoretically work though. Down the road, once VZ begins refarming CLR 850, B5 should provide LTE coverage similar to that enjoyed by B13-capable devices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an FYI and something to look at while we wait for this phone to be released ;)

 

FCC Flex test numbers

flex.jpg

 

FCC Flex 2 test numbers

flex2.jpg

 

i know the numbers don't always translate to real world performance, but the Flex 2 does appear to follow the trend of focusing on B41. B25/26 appear to be roughly the same.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an FYI and something to look at while we wait for this phone to be released ;)

 

i know the numbers don't always translate to real world performance, but the Flex 2 does appear to follow the trend of focusing on B41. B25/26 appear to be roughly the same.

 

You are correct. Sprint is doing this intentionally to make Band 41 the priority LTE band. That was the whole purpose of Network Vision 2.0 was the broad deployment of Band 41 and make devices prefer it in radio performance too. It was a very good idea too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have an educated guess as to how soon we will see this device for sale for Sprint? I am facing some troubles with my current LG G2 and I'm trying to decide if I want to reset and restore or just live with it until this device comes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have an educated guess as to how soon we will see this device for sale for Sprint? I am facing some troubles with my current LG G2 and I'm trying to decide if I want to reset and restore or just live with it until this device comes out.

 

my guess would be 2/6/15. i got the flex on release day last year which if i remember right was 2/7/14. I haven't heard any official dates yet but i would guess in february sometime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, that would be great. I was thinking more like wondering if I'd have it by April. It's been many years since I've bought a new phone from Sprint. Do they do online reservations with store pickup appointments now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

techno buffalo.com has a YouTube video of the LG G flex to for Sprint LG G Flex 2 OS Tour - Android Lollipop Gets Skin…: http://youtu.be/VxD6zDZPcBo

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...