Jump to content

Sprint Spark rises in 10/28 Sprint Coverage map


dkyeager

Recommended Posts

There are plenty of devices, herbal remedies, and pills available for that.

 

AJ

I should have known you would be the one AJ to say something. I walked into that one

 

 

 

But to get this topic back onto track, I am liking the changes they are doing so far. It will be interesting to see if they make any other improvements in the coming months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleveland shows spark along the North coast from lorain county to Eastern Cuyahoga..  Does this mean that they actually have activated 800mhz LTE (That is part of spark, correct?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleveland shows spark along the North coast from lorain county to Eastern Cuyahoga.. Does this mean that they actually have activated 800mhz LTE (That is part of spark, correct?)

Spark on the map only indicates Band 41.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can they call it spark then if their definition of spark is:

 

How Sprint Spark Works
Sprint Spark combines 4G FDD-LTE at 800 Megahertz (MHz) and 1.9 Gigahertz (GHz) and TDD-LTE at 2.5GHz spectrum. Sprint Spark’s spectrum assets, technology and architecture are designed to deliver a seamless customer experience via tri-band wireless devices. Tri-band devices, named for their ability to accommodate multiple spectrum bands, support active hand-off mode between 800MHz, 1.9GHz and 2.5GHz, providing data session continuity as the device moves between spectrum bands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can they call it spark then if their definition of spark is:

 

How Sprint Spark Works

Sprint Spark combines 4G FDD-LTE at 800 Megahertz (MHz) and 1.9 Gigahertz (GHz) and TDD-LTE at 2.5GHz spectrum. Sprint Spark’s spectrum assets, technology and architecture are designed to deliver a seamless customer experience via tri-band wireless devices. Tri-band devices, named for their ability to accommodate multiple spectrum bands, support active hand-off mode between 800MHz, 1.9GHz and 2.5GHz, providing data session continuity as the device moves between spectrum bands.

B26 LTE 800 is shown on the map as increased LTE range, while b41 LTE 2600 is shown as spark because of its higher throughput.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admittedly I never trust coverage maps much, but this has to be the most insanely over-optimistic coverage map I've ever seen, at least for coverage in west LA. It borders on false advertising (if it weren't for that wonderful disclaimer) - If people get Sprint expecting the coverage shown on the map they will be disappointed. I mean it shows best Turbo Spark coverage in tons of areas that have zero LTE right now. This map looks to me like it's what service will look like when all towers are broadcasting LTE 800, LTE 1900, and LTE 2600 - which is obviously not the current situation. The same in the Bay Area. I'm not trying to anti-Sprint rant, but what do you all think? Compared to what you see in your communities does this match up with what you're seeing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'M CURRENTLY ON 3G ON MY IPHONE 6 just wanting to no when & how long till a 4g

Update and possibly LTE here in southern

West Virginia were AT&T , Verizon & ntelos is

All running 4G LTE

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

If you are in ntelos land then you wont get sprint lte at least not for now.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'M CURRENTLY ON 3G ON MY IPHONE 6 just wanting to no when & how long till a 4g

Update and possibly LTE here in southern

West Virginia were AT&T , Verizon & ntelos is

All running 4G LTE

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

Welcome to S4GRU. Here is a good place to start. Unfortunately you are in nTelos country. You have lots of reading to do. http://www.s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4897-LTE---nTelos-(West-Virginia,-N&W-Virginia)-(not-Network-Vision)

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admittedly I never trust coverage maps much, but this has to be the most insanely over-optimistic coverage map I've ever seen, at least for coverage in west LA. It borders on false advertising (if it weren't for that wonderful disclaimer) - If people get Sprint expecting the coverage shown on the map they will be disappointed. I mean it shows best Turbo Spark coverage in tons of areas that have zero LTE right now. This map looks to me like it's what service will look like when all towers are broadcasting LTE 800, LTE 1900, and LTE 2600 - which is obviously not the current situation. The same in the Bay Area. I'm not trying to anti-Sprint rant, but what do you all think? Compared to what you see in your communities does this match up with what you're seeing? 

 

The central Maryland/Baltimore market is covered in Yellow "Spark" coverage on the maps, but most I get is band 26 on most of the interstate, which is fine for even streaming videos (3-4Mbps), but definitely not Spark speeds. All of our band 41 sites are old CLEAR sites (Baltimore was the first CLEAR market with WiMax), so hopefully when the 8T8R antennas are installed, it will improve...plus adding many more band 41 sites. Right now they are pretty sparse around Baltimore. But solid yellow spark coverage on the maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I learned to never trust the sprint maps long ago when I got my M7 and saw my whole area with 4G LTE coverage when none existed in the real world....that eventually led me here (and to Sensorly)...and while for a while I considered a move to the dark side (or the magenta one if you will), seeing my closest tower FINALLY putting out LTE, I'm sticking around to see where it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The central Maryland/Baltimore market is covered in Yellow "Spark" coverage on the maps, but most I get is band 26 on most of the interstate, which is fine for even streaming videos (3-4Mbps), but definitely not Spark speeds. All of our band 41 sites are old CLEAR sites (Baltimore was the first CLEAR market with WiMax), so hopefully when the 8T8R antennas are installed, it will improve...plus adding many more band 41 sites. Right now they are pretty sparse around Baltimore. But solid yellow spark coverage on the maps.

Clear sites are terrible, on off-peak hours I can maybe get around 20Mbps on B41. Average speeds during the day range from 3-10Mbps with basically a 0 upload. Definitely need some new backhaul I think. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleveland shows spark along the North coast from lorain county to Eastern Cuyahoga..  Does this mean that they actually have activated 800mhz LTE (That is part of spark, correct?)

 

I thought iPhone 6 was able to use Spark too??  If you chose the iPhone 6 as your device, it doesn't show any yellow...just purple and orange?   :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought iPhone 6 was able to use Spark too?? If you chose the iPhone 6 as your device, it doesn't show any yellow...just purple and orange? :wacko:

It is Spark enabled. The coverage map is messed up. This isn't the first time they forgot to include certain coverage with certain phones.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is Spark enabled. The coverage map is messed up. This isn't the first time they forgot to include certain coverage with certain phones.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Yep my Nexus 5 doesn't show up as Spark on the map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys I know you are heavily dissapointed. We just became a spark city yesterday in Denver Colorado. I've watched the progress for a year and a half. We weren't even 3g network vision accepted a year ago...  On the south Side of Denver, major thoroughfare I stay on 2500 Lte which is either Clearwire's band 41 or Sprints 85tr band 41. As I move between towers, coverage slips between them effortlessly. We are getting speeds around 35 to 50 on the Clearwire and 8t84 sites, and 5 on the low side to around an average of 12 on the other 2 Band 25 and 26 sites. We still have poor coverage in some areas, but overall, when this comes to your area, you will love it. If you aren't a premier sponsor, I highly recommend it. It gave me hope throughout the entire process. I enjoyed tracking and reporting all of our progress for the past year.... Best Wishes. Santa

 

:run::wavey:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admittedly I never trust coverage maps much, but this has to be the most insanely over-optimistic coverage map I've ever seen, at least for coverage in west LA. It borders on false advertising (if it weren't for that wonderful disclaimer) - If people get Sprint expecting the coverage shown on the map they will be disappointed. I mean it shows best Turbo Spark coverage in tons of areas that have zero LTE right now. This map looks to me like it's what service will look like when all towers are broadcasting LTE 800, LTE 1900, and LTE 2600 - which is obviously not the current situation. The same in the Bay Area. I'm not trying to anti-Sprint rant, but what do you all think? Compared to what you see in your communities does this match up with what you're seeing? 

 

Please see Dissection of Sprint Spark Coverage Map.  Given the detailed nature of the data used, please make any comments about it there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...