Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

The bigger question is why would anyone choose sprint? They aren't the largest network, not the most reliable, but the promise has always been they would be the fastest. If they could pull that off, which requires investment in the network, then they would have a place in the market. With out this, they have to compete on price and price alone.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless, this announcement makes Sprint's look like trash in comparison. I wonder if this is some type of b.s. or its real because everyone here said the s7, s7 edge and note 7 couldn't do 4x4 mimo.

Neville stated later in the month with a software update to the phones.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly what I meant by sprint always being behind. It was taken as complaining. This is a prime example, Tmo has changed out (based on the article) the hardware or whatever was needed to do 4x4. Sprint has announced 3xca in one or 2 cities. How the hell does Tmo and vzw get all this work done on towers while sprint can't seem to get past permits?? It just seems like sprint has all these issues while everyone is building out. We know they cut back spending... How will you keep up if you can't keep the build outs going??? Is this some sneaky stuff by masa to try and merge?? Is this him tired of putting money in and trying to sell??

It certainly doesn't seem like the masa/Marcelo team that said in 2 years sprint would have the best network..

 

Günther Ottendorfer (COO, Technology) is actually going to be doing an AMA in the Sprint Subreddit on Sept. 12th from 1:30PM-2:30PM CT.

 

Ask him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize 3xCA is live on more than 500 sites in Chicago and will be live on more than 100 sites in Kansas City by the end of September.

 

Sprint is testing/doing initial deployments, along with these demos, to ensure reliability.

2 cities testing

 

Vs

 

300 plus live cities current.

 

 

Granted no devices till later in the month. I also Assume tomorrow's iPhone announcements may add to that.

 

Not bashing any carrier btw. Just impressed and showing lack of faith in Sprint.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet im sitting here in the middle of the worlds biggest city with my lil bro me connected to a small cell on 47th street hitting 60mbs+ while he is connected to a congested B4 20x20+B12 5x5 CA tower on Tmobile hitting 2mbs...

The worlds biggest city? In the states? In any case yeah for new York but it isn't the world or the country.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The worlds biggest city? In the states? In any case yeah for new York but it isn't the world or the country.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Excuse me, the second largest city in the world. This is just a sample taste of what the futures look like for both companies under heavy load.

 

I do not think T-mobile feels that they will leapfrog everyone with this tech, its just to stay in the game. Most of the equipment deployed is already capable of 4x4MIMO on Sprint, Tmobile and Verizon (not sure about ATT, but most likely) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The worlds biggest city? In the states? In any case yeah for new York but it isn't the world or the country.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Doesn't take long to find out how congested their network is becoming in many places.

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/51cpfc/so_long_farewell_i_wish_you_all_a_better/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a great testament to small cells.

 

I'd be curious to know how many users attached to the small cell. And the 2mbps tmo tower.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I do not know the exact numbers, but what I can tell you is that they are both extremely popular here in NYC since all carriers offer decent service.

 

But I'm sure that the t mobile macro cell is definitely doing more heavy lifting as expected. But the one thing that the small cells are doing for sprint is relieving a ton of load off of B41/B25/26 Macro sites for mostly indoor folks.

 

I did run a speed test indoors on B25 today and was pleasantly surprised to hit 10mb near where small cells are located.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 cities testing

 

Vs

 

300 plus live cities current.

 

 

Granted no devices till later in the month. I also Assume tomorrow's iPhone announcements may add to that.

 

Not bashing any carrier btw. Just impressed and showing lack of faith in Sprint.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's just what sprint announced. Many areas already have the 3rd Carrier turned on but sprint has not announced them yet.

 

I expect a bigger announcement either this week or next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a great testament to small cells.

 

I'd be curious to know how many users attached to the small cell. And the 2mbps tmo tower.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The idea behind small cells is to have fewer user on each cell. This is part of the reason they are so good at increasing capacity.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't take long to find out how congested their network is becoming in many places

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/51cpfc/so_long_farewell_i_wish_you_all_a_better/

 

Well it's pretty obvious that T-Mobile know they are spectrum poor.

 

Hmmm which carrier is Spectrum Rich and cash poor!!? Hmm

 

Maybe DT should buy TMO a gift ;-)

 

 

The idea behind small cells is to have fewer user on each cell. This is part of the reason they are so good at increasing capacity.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

I know.

 

 

 

That's just what sprint announced. Many areas already have the 3rd Carrier turned on but sprint has not announced them yet.

 

I expect a bigger announcement either this week or next.

 

I believe that 317 cities were MIMO 4x4 upgrades... as tmo already rolled out 3rd CA.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems Magenta always have a card under their sleeves. Unless Sprint comes out do 3x carrier aggregation on a 4x4 MIMO their 230 megabits down peak speeds will be yesterday news compared with the 400 peaks Tmobile will deploy commercially. 

 

If somehow in the future Tmobile gets Dish spectrum holdings whether by merger or partnership Sprint  "With our 120mhz of 2.5ghz spectrum we will have an advantage on our competitors"  will become a total irrelevant carrier. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems Magenta always have a card under their sleeves. Unless Sprint comes out do 3x carrier aggregation on a 4x4 MIMO their 230 megabits down peak speeds will be yesterday news compared with the 400 peaks Tmobile will deploy commercially. 

You do realize that All Sprint B41 (not clear obviously) equipment support 4x4 MIMO? and Sprint has it in the cards for next year. So 3XCA(20+20+20)+4x4 MIMO is quite a bit higher than 400mbs...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems Magenta always have a card under their sleeves. Unless Sprint comes out do 3x carrier aggregation on a 4x4 MIMO their 230 megabits down peak speeds will be yesterday news compared with the 400 peaks Tmobile will deploy commercially. 

 

If somehow in the future Tmobile gets Dish spectrum holdings whether by merger or partnership Sprint  "With our 120mhz of 2.5ghz spectrum we will have an advantage on our competitors"  will become a total irrelevant carrier. 

 

Sprint has the ability to go to 4xCA and 5xCA (and perhaps beyond) on 20 MHz wide channels on its 2.5 GHz spectrum, which it claims to have more than 160 MHz of in the top 100 markets. As far as I know, no other carrier has the ability to do this.

 

This doesn't count Sprint's plans to use even higher frequencies for its network as well. I think there's far more going on at Sprint than we're aware of.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that All Sprint B41 (not clear obviously) equipment support 4x4 MIMO? and Sprint has it in the cards for next year. So 3XCA(20+20+20)+4x4 MIMO is quite a bit higher than 400mbs...

That's awesome!!!

 

I just wish the historical accomplishments were as awesome....

 

Sprint has the ability to go to 4xCA and 5xCA (and perhaps beyond) on 20 MHz wide channels on its 2.5 GHz spectrum, which it claims to have more than 160 MHz of in the top 100 markets. As far as I know, no other carrier has the ability to do this.

 

This doesn't count Sprint's plans to use even higher frequencies for its network as well. I think there's far more going on at Sprint than we're aware of.

 

But wouldn't that be "WiMAX" 2.0? Meaning that cell phone manufacturers would need to make custom "bands" to handle the CA?

 

As most carriers won't go past 3?

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has the ability to go to 4xCA and 5xCA (and perhaps beyond) on 20 MHz wide channels on its 2.5 GHz spectrum, which it claims to have more than 160 MHz of in the top 100 markets. As far as I know, no other carrier has the ability to do this.

 

This doesn't count Sprint's plans to use even higher frequencies for its network as well. I think there's far more going on at Sprint than we're aware of.

The problem with sprint is not with the spectrum sprint has, but with the companies ability to deploy it in a fashion that gains it a competitive advantage. Now, it seems they aren't even staying competitive and that is a problem.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 cities testing

 

Vs

 

300 plus live cities current.

 

 

Granted no devices till later in the month. I also Assume tomorrow's iPhone announcements may add to that.

 

Not bashing any carrier btw. Just impressed and showing lack of faith in Sprint.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NYC is one of the "available cities" and 4x4 MIMO is available in less places on T-Mobile than small cells are available on Sprint.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with sprint is not with the spectrum sprint has, but with the companies ability to deploy it in a fashion that gains it a competitive advantage. Now, it seems they aren't even staying competitive and that is a problem.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Reading through that reddit thread it seems Tmo is the one trying to stay competitive through their deployment of 4X4 MIMO. Only a few devices are currently capable of even using it so it's not a huge deal until they can move more people to capable handsets. Sounds like a good opportunity to get people to upgrade if they're experiencing slow connections.

 

Sent from my SM-N930P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with sprint is not with the spectrum sprint has, but with the companies ability to deploy it in a fashion that gains it a competitive advantage. Now, it seems they aren't even staying competitive and that is a problem.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

What I have seen is very different, where before T mobile solidified their service in big cities and Sprint was busy deploying and upgrading everywhere. Now the roles are reversed.

 

Now it seems that T mobile is concentrated in network expansion, but at the cost of metro areas being more easily congested (they are spectrum starved to a certain degree so I understand)

 

Where as Sprint has been deploying a ton of infill and extra capacity in cities with a second B25 carrier and expanding to 10x10 where they can. Also adding 3rd B41 carrier and small cells.

 

Bottom line, none of the carriers are standing still. But I'm confident Sprint will be better than fine at the end of the day, Balancing the Sprint budget is a tall order, and I think Marcelo has taken the bulls by the horn and understands what they need to be successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with sprint is not with the spectrum sprint has, but with the companies ability to deploy it in a fashion that gains it a competitive advantage. Now, it seems they aren't even staying competitive and that is a problem.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

Ask Günther about that in the upcoming AMA. This is right in his wheelhouse per his bio.

 

He'll either give you an answer to your satisfaction, or he won't.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that All Sprint B41 (not clear obviously) equipment support 4x4 MIMO? and Sprint has it in the cards for next year. So 3XCA(20+20+20)+4x4 MIMO is quite a bit higher than 400mbs...

Lets not forget 2100 AWS penetrates better than 2500 also Tmobile has more sites capable of 4x4 MIMO than Sprint does. Sprint still has thousands of sites still using 20mhz or less of spectrum 25/26 and no band 41 in site. I don't think small cells or clear equipment are even capable of 4x4 MIMO but correct me if I am wrong.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...