Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

The audio argument is really tedious. If you want higher audio quality, pay for the premium data. Not really that hard.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

Not really arguing in these posts. Mostly just a fair discussion over audio. As I've said though, rate plans seem to change quite often, and I think Sprint and T-Mobile probably are going to change a few things on both of their plans. Already on the T-Mobile side, there isn't much popularity to the T-Mobile One plans, particularly from reading the comments on TmoNews.

 

Between the unpopular plan changes and the Note 7 battery issue, kind of a downer amidst the IFA show I've been reading about online in searches among these other issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really arguing in these posts. Mostly just a fair discussion over audio. As I've said though, rate plans seem to change quite often, and I think Sprint and T-Mobile probably are going to change a few things on both of their plans. Already on the T-Mobile side, there isn't much popularity to the T-Mobile One plans, particularly from reading the comments on TmoNews.

 

Between the unpopular plan changes and the Note 7 battery issue, kind of a downer amidst the IFA show I've been reading about online in searches among these other issues.

Pay for it, if you want. If not don't. Simple.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pay for it, if you want. If not don't. Simple.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

Now I'm confused. Where did I say I wanted the plan or not? I have AT&T and am not planning on switching to Sprint at the moment. Doesn't mean that I can't have an opinion on their plans. Besides, I haven't even mentioned the Sprint plan for a while now. This thread has been a discussion over other things now for some time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arysyn, you are arguing, or debating, whatever. Time to agree to disagree!

 

Sent from my SM-T530NU using Tapatalk

 

Where have I argued lately? I've been saying in quite a few of my past posts that everyone has their own opinion and their preferences in smartphones. I don't think I can be any clearer by that in doing exactly what you suggested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The audio argument is really tedious. If you want higher audio quality, pay for the premium data. Not really that hard.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

Agreed. Can we stfu on the cell phone audio? I come here to read about Sprint, not cell phone sounds.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did tweet something last night about no coverage in a particular area and the only response from him was he liked the tweet.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

I tweeted him yesterday and he replied to me today asking for a direst message about issues I'm seeing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd argue though that while 4k is important to a degree, if its going to be in smartphones, it needs to have a battery good enough to handle it. My opinion is at least 5000mah for it.

Nope. Arysyn we already had a 4K phone.

We live in 2016, we don't just throw things at it. We make stuff more efficient.

3500-4000mAh on a 5.5-5.8 phone will be perfect for 4K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two question for the collective here:

 

- CA is just for speed increase and not coverage correct?

 

- does Boost have any downside if using it strictly to test coverage for voice, SMS, and data? On one of their low cost phones?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two question for the collective here:

 

- CA is just for speed increase and not coverage correct?

 

- does Boost have any downside if using it strictly to test coverage for voice, SMS, and data? On one of their low cost phones?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It is my understanding that CA helps cell edge performance.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two question for the collective here:

 

- CA is just for speed increase and not coverage correct?

 

- does Boost have any downside if using it strictly to test coverage for voice, SMS, and data? On one of their low cost phones?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Won't help with coverage. Just speeds

 

As far as boost, some of their low cost phones may not have CA.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't help with coverage. Just speeds

 

As far as boost, some of their low cost phones may not have CA.

That's fine -- it's just to test drive the network. I find it's easier and cheaper than signing up for post paid just to cancel in a few days.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that CA helps cell edge performance.

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

It most certainly does:

 

http://newsroom.sprint.com/blogs/sprint-perspectives/introducing-the-sprint-lte-plus-network--faster-stronger-more-reliable-than-ever-before.htm

 

See the chart in this Blog Post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It most certainly doesn't.

 

Beamforming ≠ Carrier Aggregation.

 

Not the same thing. If Johnner has a triband phone without CA capability, then he won't see a difference in coverage if he were to pick up a CA capable phone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It most certainly doesn't.

 

Beamforming ≠ Carrier Aggregation.

 

Not the same thing. If Johnner has a triband phone without CA capability, then he won't see a difference in coverage if he were to pick up a CA capable phone.

According to the information provided by sprint beamforming increase cell edge performance by 20 percent and beamforming +carrier aggregation increases cell edge performance by 50 percent. So it does.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...