Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Most of the ones I point out are ones in people's neighborhoods, for the very reason of demonstrating that when you arent thinking about them, you don't see them. If you want to see how this works, take a walk around your neighborhood and look for satellite dishes on your neighbor's roofs. You will find that more have them than you would have guessed. But the next time your phone doesn't send that picture or you drop a call you will certainly notice that.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

More low band could help too. *Thinks of 600 mhz auction, gets sad*

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More low band could help too. *Thinks of 600 mhz auction, gets sad*

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Still wouldn't solve the immediate problems that small cells address. It would be too little too late. I haven't found an area with service so poor that my phone calls drop and texts don't go through.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

*looks at neighborhoods with all underground utilities...*

 

My neighborhood is one of the city's many "historic districts" and the only utilities on the streets are light poles. We have telephone poles in some of our backyards but they're required to be shorter than our homes so that they don't show when viewing the front of the house. Because the poles are in the back of the house I'm not sure how useful it'll be to put a small cell there but if they ever wanted to, it's literally in my backyard!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still wouldn't solve the immediate problems that small cells address. It would be too little too late. I haven't found an area with service so poor that my phone calls drop and texts don't go through.

 

That could be do to geographic location.

Here in the Northeast with hills and mountains I can have incredible coverage, drive down a hill lose it until I start coming up on the other side--- perfect location. For small cells

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lowry Park Zoo in Tampa needs a small cell. Horrible horrible experience there.

 

 

Have you reported this in the Sprint Zone App?

 

You could also contact the Zoo's management and have them reach out to Sprint for a small cell with these forms:

 

Site Eligibility Requirements

Site Submission Form

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People on both sides of the issue are missing a key aspect of Mobilite's solutions: they are proposing 70-foot wooden poles in many areas. Those who write off Sprint's small cell efforts fail to realize that these mini macro cells are going to be practically the same height as many of AT&T and Verizon's full-scale macro antennas. They need these to be tall enough to propagate high-band spectrum over nearby buildings.

 

On the other side, those who simply cry NIMBY should take a good look at the photo in the linked article:

 

Uu4FvO8.jpg

 

The utility pole pictured is 30 feet tall. Mobilite wants to put in poles more than twice that height. That's why people are upset. Half of Alltel's macro network in Baton Rouge, Louisiana is wooden poles, and even they used 30-footers. The only reason these things are going to be considered small cells at this point are because of the mini macro equipment installed on them.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People on both sides of the issue are missing a key aspect of Mobilite's solutions: they are proposing 70-foot wooden poles in many areas. Those who write off Sprint's small cell efforts fail to realize that these mini macro cells are going to be practically the same height as many of AT&T and Verizon's full-scale macro antennas. They need these to be tall enough to propagate high-band spectrum over nearby buildings.

 

On the other side, those who simply cry NIMBY should take a good look at the photo in the linked article:

 

Uu4FvO8.jpg

 

The utility pole pictured is 30 feet tall. Mobilite wants to put in poles more than twice that height. That's why people are upset. Half of Alltel's macro network in Baton Rouge, Louisiana is wooden poles, and even they used 30-footers. The only reason these things are going to be considered small cells at this point are because of the mini macro equipment installed on them.

The assumption that a pole 70 feet high would be any more of an eye sore than that multi-dwelling housing unit is absurd. Sorry it is. Wireless towers become part of the urban back ground.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanna make sure it's clear since the context is on the private side of this forum: my post and the quotes therein earlier in this thread were about 27-foot metal all-cables-hidden ODAS nodes (that's the height given by the company, not an estimate by me), not 70-foot Mobilitie small cells.

 

Is Mobilitie really trying to use 70-foot poles everywhere or is this an isolated example?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanna make sure it's clear since the context is on the private side of this forum: my post and the quotes therein earlier in this thread were about 27-foot metal all-cables-hidden ODAS nodes (that's the height given by the company, not an estimate by me), not 70-foot Mobilitie small cells.

 

Is Mobilitie really trying to use 70-foot poles everywhere or is this an isolated example?

 

Sprint wants them in a lot of places because they're much cheaper to put up than full-blown macro sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you reported this in the Sprint Zone App?

 

You could also contact the Zoo's management and have them reach out to Sprint for a small cell with these forms:

 

Site Eligibility Requirements

Site Submission Form

What exactly comes from reporting through the app? I've reported the same spot at least 50 times here in NJ and nothing. I don't even bother using it anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The assumption that a pole 70 feet high would be any more of an eye sore than that multi-dwelling housing unit is absurd. Sorry it is. Wireless towers become part of the urban back ground.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Theres a difference between a cellphone tower being inside private property vs. a 70 foot tall pole sticking out right next to the side of the road.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theres a difference between a cellphone tower being inside private property vs. a 70 foot tall pole sticking out right next to the side of the road.

My point is that if you are going to complain about the looks of a 70 foot pole you might want to consider the looks of the buildings around it. That housing unit was far more offensive than a tall pole.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly comes from reporting through the app? I've reported the same spot at least 50 times here in NJ and nothing. I don't even bother using it anymore.

When enough issue reports are filed within a certain amount of time, Sprint opens a investigation.

 

Honestly, you should reach out to the zoo management and tell them that your zoo experience would be enhanced with better wireless service from Sprint. Have them fill out the forms for Sprint to follow up with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When enough issue reports are filed within a certain amount of time, Sprint opens a investigation.

 

Honestly, you should reach out to the zoo management and tell them that your zoo experience would be enhanced with better wireless service from Sprint. Have them fill out the forms for Sprint to follow up with them.

I doubt one complaint about Sprint is going to get Sprint to do anything about it. In alot of cases Sprint knows its weak areas and may choose to address it or ignore it. Chances are this method will solve anythhing without multiple people also reporting.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that if you are going to complain about the looks of a 70 foot pole you might want to consider the looks of the buildings around it. That housing unit was far more offensive than a tall pole.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

People are not going to just roll over and allow a 70 foot pole to be erected on their street just because their residence is "offensive" to you.

 

Hell, I find newer suburban communities to be ugly and lacking uniqueness. But that doesn't mean they shouldn't have their concerns heard and even acted upon. To each their own...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are not going to just roll over and allow a 70 foot pole to be erected on their street just because their residence is "offensive" to you.

 

Hell, I find newer suburban communities to be ugly and lacking uniqueness. But that doesn't mean they shouldn't have their concerns heard and even acted upon. To each their own...

Then don't complain about sucky cell phone service.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt one complaint about Sprint is going to get Sprint to do anything about it. In alot of cases Sprint knows its weak areas and may choose to address it or ignore it. Chances are this method will solve anythhing without multiple people also reporting.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Perhaps he's not the only one complaining.

 

He should still reach out to Zoo Management and put them in touch with Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps he's not the only one complaining.

 

He should still reach out to Zoo Management and put them in touch with Sprint.

Worth a shot. Worse case senerio is nothing happens.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When enough issue reports are filed within a certain amount of time, Sprint opens a investigation.

 

Honestly, you should reach out to the zoo management and tell them that your zoo experience would be enhanced with better wireless service from Sprint. Have them fill out the forms for Sprint to follow up with them.

 

I love sprint and definitely pulling for the underdog. But it's crazy with all that money and technology WE need to reach out to zoo management then have them contact sprint to get better service.

I understand the middle of nowhere but a zoo??? The first thing sprint should be doing is checking on amusement parks,malls, airports, stadiums, places of interest.... Smh it seems like it should be common sense?? No?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then don't complain about sucky cell phone service.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

If wireless providers want to install small cells, then they need to do a better job of camouflaging these equipment. They already do so in so many places (flag pole towers, fake palm trees cells, etc) so why not do the same for small cells? It doesn't matter how ugly or poor a community is; Mobilite (and all providers) needs to respect the concerns of the residents of the communities they want to install these small cells in. It would be a terrible PR move not to do so for Sprint.

 

There's also a huge difference between a small cell above an existing street light and a new stand alone 70 ft. wood pole in plain view. One of the benefits of small cells was supposed to be discreetness. And at 70 ft., they aren't trying to hide these anymore.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If wireless providers want to install small cells, then they need to do a better job of camouflaging these equipment. They already do so in so many places (flag pole towers, fake palm trees cells, etc) so why not do the same for small cells? It doesn't matter how ugly or poor a community is; Mobilite (and all providers) needs to respect the concerns of the residents of the communities they want to install these small cells in. It would be a terrible PR move not to do so for Sprint.

 

There's also a huge difference between a small cell above an existing street light and a new stand alone 70 ft. wood pole in plain view. One of the benefits of small cells was supposed to be discreetness. And at 70 ft., they aren't trying to hide these anymore.

Excuse me but that is you opinion. Frankly I like the way cell towers look. If you whine about the way these things look and the economics doesn't work out for them they won't build and it is your fault. So don't complain. The world isnt perfect. Get over it.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excuse me but that is you opinion. Frankly I like the way cell towers look. If you whine about the way these things look and the economics doesn't work out for them they won't build and it is your fault. So don't complain. The world isnt perfect. Get over it.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

You like them, but it's obvious there is a segment of homeowners who don't. And it boggles my mind how you can't understand that. Personally, I would do everything possible to stop a 70 ft. pole from being erected if that was my property in the picture above. Especially since there are existing utility poles that can be used already in place.

 

There are many people who like to keep certain neighborhoods looking a certain way. Providing coverage is the Wireless carrier's problem, not the users. If Sprint doesn't want to play by the rules a specific neighborhood sets, then I'm sure another provider will at some point in order to gain customers in that area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...