Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

In my market I almost am never on B26 not unless I'm in church. Outside of being in church I'm always on B41. I know a lot of people on here just want B26 to be optimized. I on the other hand just want my VoLTE but I know that's a long ways out.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my market I almost am never on B26 not unless I'm in church. Outside of being in church I'm always on B41. I know a lot of people on here just want B26 to be optimized. I on the other hand just want my VoLTE but I know that's a long ways out.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s+ using Tapatalk

Same! I need to to use voice and data at the same time because of my job. I know I can use google hangouts but still ???? Lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm almost never on Band 26 anymore since Sprint did quite a bit of optimization here but that said it is still pretty loaded on average. My neighborhood has poor site spacing but thanks to Clear having better spacing on my neighborhood that Sprint did I actually have a strong Band 41 signal outside.

Indoors I am on WiFi 99% of the time but this is what Band 26 looks like in my home right about now. Once again I had to force this by running to my basement for it to connect to Band 26 and then run back upstairs to where I normally am to run this test. Not nearly as easy as going into settings and turning off LTE.
59716cd9fbedcebdddfdd802ed981d75.jpg

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm almost never on Band 26 anymore since Sprint did quite a bit of optimization here but that said it is still pretty loaded on average. My neighborhood has poor site spacing but thanks to Clear having better spacing on my neighborhood that Sprint did I actually have a strong Band 41 signal outside.

 

Indoors I am on WiFi 99% of the time but this is what Band 26 looks like in my home right about now. Once again I had to force this by running to my basement for it to connect to Band 26 and then run back upstairs to where I normally am to run this test. Not nearly as easy as going into settings and turning off LTE.

59716cd9fbedcebdddfdd802ed981d75.jpg

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Whoever is in charge of your market for Sprint is doing one heck of a job. I usually average around -105 RSRP with -10 dB SNR inside my house on Band 25. Unfortunately I see my phone jump back and forth between a congested B26 and a decently fast B25. The network recently won (well tied) for best according to Rootmetrics, so I'm not so optimistic that Sprint will fix the network balancing issues anytime soon. Especially with so many other markets needing attention.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, it does. W-CDMA uses 3-4 times the spectrum bandwidth that CDMA2000 does. That basically means that each W-CDMA carrier requires its own 5 MHz FDD block, much like LTE in a 5 MHz FDD carrier configuration. Thus, W-CDMA can be difficult to deploy -- absent existing massive spectrum resources or new "greenfield" spectrum. Note how T-Mobile was 3-4 years late to the 3G party precisely because of that disadvantage. T-Mobile had to wait on AWS-1 in order to deploy W-CDMA. On the other hand, CDMA2000, at 1.25 MHz FDD, is less difficult to deploy in existing spectrum.

 

AJ

You're 100% right about that AJ but that 5x5 block allows for the same if not greater amount of traffic as well as greater overall throughput. I was focusing more so on real world issues for users, such as voice quality issues when switching sectors/sites for GSM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More of 3.8 /4.2 MHz for wcdma carriers nowadays. You can fit GSM in there as well with the freed up spectrum which is what tmobile does with their PCS wcdma / GSM setups.

 

I think several tmobile markets actually have upwards of 3 or 4 slim wcdma carriers configured for hspa+21 configuration (though some have been decommissioned as they do band 2 lte). Cdma evdo cannot touch that in terms of capacity at all.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 3G and 4g within 100 feet on a Sunday afternoon

congestion??? Seriously??? I highly doubt it this is what hurts sprints rep.

 

You need to report this in Sprint Zone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to report this in Sprint Zone.

 

Lmao!

I do!

All the time wherever I am I use that. Nothing has changed my thought was if they get enough complaints they would look into it.

Honestly speaking though, with all this high tech stuff they should know and it should get fixed in a timely matter not months as some have reported.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmao!

I do!

All the time wherever I am I use that. Nothing has changed my thought was if they get enough complaints they would look into it.

Honestly speaking though, with all this high tech stuff they should know and it should get fixed in a timely matter not months as some have reported.

It's been my experience that reporting in Sprint Zone is a waste of time. I used to use it all the time but now I don't even bother. To be fair though I live in New Jersey and Sprint has zero interest that market. Especially the central part of it.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmao!

I do!

All the time wherever I am I use that. Nothing has changed my thought was if they get enough complaints they would look into it.

Honestly speaking though, with all this high tech stuff they should know and it should get fixed in a timely matter not months as some have reported.

 

I use Sprint Zone a lot to report issues where there is low signal or no LTE. Do they look at these reports or is it a waste of time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Sprint Zone a lot to report issues where there is low signal or no LTE. Do they look at these reports or is it a waste of time?

From my experience its a huge waste of time. Nothing ever gets done. Its like reporting to nothing.
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Sprint Zone a lot to report issues where there is low signal or no LTE. Do they look at these reports or is it a waste of time?

 

 

The jury is out on that one. Everyone says use it but I don't think there is a way to check until the tower gets fixed. I would say it probably goes to some center in Kansas then back to your region then a couple of places from there.

 

******this is me venting>>> Honestly the way the whole thing works is stupid. (In regards to sprint maybe all carriers) they have so many different people doing different things on a tower ex

Fiber guy

The antennae guy

The guy to check it

The Lte guy

The 3G guy

The guy who says turn it on

The guy who optimizes it

And so forth

Point is it's always someone different for every little thing

I spoke with 4 tower guys working for sprint who came up from New Jersey to work on a tower here 4 hrs each way.. To replace a line squirels chewed through.. All the way from nj?? Boston is an Hr from here, no techs in Boston??? None in Hartford? Albany? New haven? There are major cities all within 1.5 hours and they come from nj? That's wasted money.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Sprint Zone a lot to report issues where there is low signal or no LTE. Do they look at these reports or is it a waste of time?

 

Perhaps someone could ask Marcelo about this on Twitter directly for him to answer in the affirmative/negative.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like he would admit that it didn't do anything.

 

We either take him at his word or not.

 

If you don't believe him on this, why believe him on anything else he says?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thinking is this: I seriously doubt the report volume is significantly overwhelming. In fact, I'd go so far as to say probably less than 5% of subscribers have ever used the "report" function in the Sprint Zone app. I'm probably the only person in the lower half of my city that uses it. I could be wrong on that, but IME nobody outside of this forum actually cares enough to do something like fill out a report. Nearly everybody would find it easier to DM the Sprint Twitter account. It's not advertised anywhere in the app outside of the network tab, and you have to type out a full address if you're reporting in-building coverage problems.

 

So, I'd think it would be trivially easy for Sprint to actually pay attention to those reports if the volume is as low as I'm guessing. If someone outside of this forum goes to the trouble to look up how to send Sprint a problem report, that indicates there's a significant network problem in that area.

 

I have no idea how much attention they pay the reports. For all I know they could be having an engineer read each one personally. But I haven't personally had much success with reports. Maybe it's because I send most of them through an unsupported Nexus 5X? If the problem is really bad I'll go to the trouble of submitting reports on my parents' E8s but that hasn't appeared to make a difference.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You brought up some interesting points.

 

As far as I've heard given Sprint's downsizing, Sprint has made an effort to have customers utilize more self-service features, and that includes Sprint Zone to report network issues (and for billing inquiries, etc.) Apparently, store reps are required to set up Sprint Zone and give a brief orientation on supported devices.

 

Issue reports in Sprint Zone are essentially the same as contacting tech support and filing a network issue "pinpoint" report... unless we make the assumption that those don't get looked at either.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You brought up some interesting points.

 

As far as I've heard given Sprint's downsizing, Sprint has made an effort to have customers utilize more self-service features, and that includes Sprint Zone to report network issues (and for billing inquiries, etc.) Apparently, store reps are required to set up Sprint Zone and give a brief orientation on supported devices.

 

Issue reports in Sprint Zone are essentially the same as contacting tech support and filing a network issue "pinpoint" report... unless we make the assumption that those don't get looked at either.

I realized after I posted it was possible that reps are supposed to tell people about it. Still, I would think most people would rather DM a Twitter account and have someone get back to them.

 

We've had people report success with phoned-in reports, right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From my experience its a huge waste of time. Nothing ever gets done. Its like reporting to nothing.

Just from personal experience, I reported slow data speeds for over a year on one spot weekly and they never even took a look until I contacted Marcelo's email.
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More than 40% of Sprint's traffic is on 2.5 GHz, Wells Fargo says

 

Sounds like Sprint has made some real progress on this front, including the comments on small cells.

 

"The most interesting take-away was the fact that today Sprint carries more "tonnage per subscriber" of data than any other carrier in the US - yet it is using only less than 25% of its 2.5GHz spectrum holdings. Think about that - using less than 1/4 of its 2.5GHz spectrum, more tonnage/ sub than any carrier and no meaningful congestion."

 

Interesting info on sales/distribution being a concern.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just from personal experience, I reported slow data speeds for over a year on one spot weekly and they never even took a look until I contacted Marcelo's email.

 

What happened once they took a look?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happened once they took a look?

They actually called me to tell me they adjusted the downtilt, but it did not resolve the slow data speeds.  But at least I got a confirmation that they actually sent a technician out.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They actually called me to tell me they adjusted the downtilt, but it did not resolve the slow data speeds.  But at least I got a confirmation that they actually sent a technician out.

 

I guess you need a small cell near you.

 

You could always put in a request!  Have space for a pole?  ;)  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...