Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts



This entire thing falls apart when you see that the top ranked carriers are all Sprint and T-Mobile MVNOs despite Sprint getting the lowest ratings. All you have to do to see that BGR loves to fan the flames on the Sprint hate train is search for Sprint on their website. Literally every article where Sprint is mentioned is an attack on them. Searching for T-Mobile shows an article for every single deal they have.


I sincerely believe BGR is written or edited by tmo employees.
I don't click on their articles instead opening pages in the related search on Google.

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites






I sincerely believe BGR is written or edited by tmo employees.
I don't click on their articles instead opening pages in the related search on Google.

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk



Ever since they were sold. Bgr is the worst.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Johnner1999 said:

 


Ever since they were sold. Bgr is the worst.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I wish they had sold to a German conglomerate.  Then I could say they are the wurst.  :hah:

  • Like 8
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Paynefanbro said:

This entire thing falls apart when you see that the top ranked carriers are all Sprint and T-Mobile MVNOs despite Sprint getting the lowest ratings. All you have to do to see that BGR loves to fan the flames on the Sprint hate train is search for Sprint on their website. Literally every article where Sprint is mentioned is an attack on them. Searching for T-Mobile shows an article for every single deal they have. They even have an article telling readers that a T-Mobile BOGO deal ends in 8 hours. The site borders on T-Mobile advertisement.

Even TmoNews isn't that biased and they're a site strictly about T-Mobile.

They're just parroting what Consumers Reports study concluded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/8/2017 at 12:55 PM, derrph said:

Why is this still a thing with Sprint

SO I guess Pokemon GO is still a thing to the point Sprint giving out poke coins or whatever if you switch to Sprint. I Just don't see why they (Sprint) are trying to make this a thing still. I'm sure the majority has moved on from PG besides the younger kids. SMH.

Tell that to my 45 year old wife. :rolleyes:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:

Meanwhile back in reality land, Sprint just surpassed At&t in overall speed according to ookla..

 

BGR does not approve of this message. 

  • Like 5
  • Love 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:

In fact, they should be in second unless V is faster than last reported..

SmartSelectImage_2017-12-22-17-00-20.jpg

 

39 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:

Solid improvements for Sprint.

http://newsroom.sprint.com/celebrating-and-accelerating.htm

Nice. I wonder if we’ll see some articles on this soon. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bigsnake49 said:

They're just parroting what Consumers Reports study concluded.

I know that, however they could have made the title any other thing but they knew jumping on the hate train would gain them clicks. Sensationalized headline and an article that unnecessarily bashes Sprint while AT&T and VZW are basically right alongside them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/22/2017 at 5:01 PM, nexgencpu said:

In fact, they should be in second unless V is faster than last reported..

SmartSelectImage_2017-12-22-17-00-20.jpg

Am I missing something here? It shows TMUS at 23.17, VZ at 21.13, T at 20.05,and S at 15.39. Doesn’t this make them in 4th still?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:

They are not very far behind AT&T which is a great thing. Sprint needs to stick around. They are a very viable competitor to the other carriers.

No, they already surpassed Att, they are neck and neck with TMO and V.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:

No, they already surpassed Att, they are neck and neck with TMO and V.

Will Sprint do better once they roll-out 256 QAM and 4X4 MIMO nationwide? What is taking so long to do so anyways?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bucdenny said:

Will Sprint do better once they roll-out 256 QAM and 4X4 MIMO nationwide? What is taking so long to do so anyways?

Cost is the most likely culprit, but it's coming soon. Also they seem 100% committed to massive mimo. So I fully expect 4x4 to come together with massive mimo some time in early to mid '18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, they already surpassed Att, they are neck and neck with TMO and V.


Is there an updated chart with the updated numbers for all 4 carriers?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nexgencpu said:

Cost is the most likely culprit, but it's coming soon. Also they seem 100% committed to massive mimo. So I fully expect 4x4 to come together with massive mimo some time in early to mid '18

Is it not a software/firmware update on the existing 8T8R equipment?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...