Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

You're putting too much stock into these "5G trials". As far as we are concerned, these tests are to determine if high band spectrum will actually work. There are no guarantees, even for small cell usage.

Since Verizon is attempting to buy a company out for both its fiber optic network and EHF holdings, I'm pretty confident in the tech. On top of this, lots of companies are coming out with new mmW based network tech. It's extremely promising, so I expect amazing results from the trials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Verizon is attempting to buy a company out for both its fiber optic network and EHF holdings, I'm pretty confident in the tech.

We don't even know what the actual 'tech' is. Don't expect this '5G' to be used by cellphones if they are indeed going to use high band spectrum. Maybe fixed locations, but definitely not cellphones.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't even know what the actual 'tech' is. Don't expect this '5G' to be used by cellphones if they are indeed going to use high band spectrum. Maybe fixed locations, but definitely not cellphones.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/wireless/millimeter-waves-may-be-the-future-of-5g-phones

According to Samsung in this article, by concentrating the radio energy into a narrow beam, a phone can receive/send the signal without upping Tx power. Would simply require very intelligent small cells, in theory. But you're right, a lot of this is theoretical. I just think chances are, it's the future. Everyone is throwing their hat in the mmW ring, including Sprint. Gonna be exciting few years!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/wireless/millimeter-waves-may-be-the-future-of-5g-phones

According to Samsung in this article, by concentrating the radio energy into a narrow beam, a phone can receive/send the signal without upping Tx power. Would simply require very intelligent small cells, in theory. But you're right, a lot of this is theoretical. I just think chances are, it's the future. Everyone is throwing their hat in the mmW ring, including Sprint. Gonna be exciting few years!!

Don't get me wrong, they could definitely make this work, BUT it won't be years...It will be decades. Making highband spectrum work on phones will be a challenge.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Verizon is attempting to buy a company out for both its fiber optic network and EHF holdings, I'm pretty confident in the tech. On top of this, lots of companies are coming out with new mmW based network tech. It's extremely promising, so I expect amazing results from the trials.

You are aware right now Verizon's trial are doing it from a WISP like distribution. Not mobile.

 

Sent from my LGLS996 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are aware right now Verizon's trial are doing it from a WISP like distribution. Not mobile.

 

Sent from my LGLS996 using Tapatalk

Absolutely, but there is an extremely high chance they'll be experimenting with handheld radios to see results. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely, but there is an extremely high chance they'll be experimenting with handheld radios to see results.

How much protection are you willing to wear being with in 3 feet of that high a frequency at 50mw. You will get burned

 

You're putting too much stock into these "5G trials". As far as we are concerned, these tests are to determine if high band spectrum will actually work. There are no guarantees, even for small cell usage.

Sent from my LGLS996 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty interesting article about Mobilitie (which is Sprint's smallcell deployment partner) Vs Crown's own interpretation of deployment in similar areas and the challenges they face. The article even mention's UE relay on Mobilitie's proposal on this one particular site. 

 

http://www.steelintheair.com/Blog/2016/04/tale-of-two-small-cell-proposals-crown-castle-vs-mobilitie.html

 

Appearance review report for the sites is also on here...

 

Submitted in December, so Sprint has been going at it for a while.

 

http://www.cityoforlando.net/city-planning/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2015/12/ARB2015-00082report.pdf

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty interesting article about Mobilitie (which is Sprint's smallcell deployment partner) Vs Crown's own interpretation of deployment in similar areas and the challenges they face. The article even mention's UE relay on Mobilitie's proposal on this one particular site.

 

http://www.steelintheair.com/Blog/2016/04/tale-of-two-small-cell-proposals-crown-castle-vs-mobilitie.html

 

Appearance review report for the sites is also on here...

 

Submitted in December, so Sprint has been going at it for a while.

 

http://www.cityoforlando.net/city-planning/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2015/12/ARB2015-00082report.pdf

One major takeaway from this is that Sprint is gonna be hit with a slower rollout compared to others due to the requests for 70-100' poles to get LoS signal. I wonder how the permitting is gonna go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One major takeaway from this is that Sprint is gonna be hit with a slower rollout compared to others due to the requests for 70-100' poles to get LoS signal. I wonder how the permitting is gonna go.

Im certain that Marcelo's visit to FL to have talks with local government officials went smooth enough that they are confident to get these things get passed quite a bit quicker than previously possible since he was boasting about how well things went.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im certain that Marcelo's visit to FL to have talks with local government officials went smooth enough that they are confident to get these things get passed quite a bit quicker than previously possible since he was boasting about how well things went.

ONE THING I gotta give them though - more 70-100' poles means far less DAS locations than Crown Castle - so Orlando won't be small cell block by block. So while rollout might be a bit slower, the cost won't be as high and coverage should be well coated.

 

My one question - and I'm sure this has been answered - but can these sites do CA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ONE THING I gotta give them though - more 70-100' poles means far less DAS locations than Crown Castle - so Orlando won't be small cell block by block. So while rollout might be a bit slower, the cost won't be as high and coverage should be well coated.

 

My one question - and I'm sure this has been answered - but can these sites do CA?

Yes they can...

 

Here is one live in FL..

 

https://twitter.com/RFtelecomGuy/status/703746451327815682

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty interesting article about Mobilitie (which is Sprint's smallcell deployment partner) Vs Crown's own interpretation of deployment in similar areas and the challenges they face. The article even mention's UE relay on Mobilitie's proposal on this one particular site. 

 

http://www.steelintheair.com/Blog/2016/04/tale-of-two-small-cell-proposals-crown-castle-vs-mobilitie.html

 

Appearance review report for the sites is also on here...

 

Submitted in December, so Sprint has been going at it for a while.

 

http://www.cityoforlando.net/city-planning/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2015/12/ARB2015-00082report.pdf

 

That's a great article.  As I was reading it I was thinking Crown has been in the tower game for a while and seems like they know how to get permits approved quicker.  Hopefully Mobilitie doesn't hit snags trying to get their permits approved and their small cells deployed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty interesting article about Mobilitie (which is Sprint's smallcell deployment partner) Vs Crown's own interpretation of deployment in similar areas and the challenges they face. The article even mention's UE relay on Mobilitie's proposal on this one particular site. 

 

http://www.steelintheair.com/Blog/2016/04/tale-of-two-small-cell-proposals-crown-castle-vs-mobilitie.html

 

Appearance review report for the sites is also on here...

 

Submitted in December, so Sprint has been going at it for a while.

 

http://www.cityoforlando.net/city-planning/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2015/12/ARB2015-00082report.pdf

 

From the article:

 

 

1. First come, first served. Multiple wireless service providers or neutral hosts like Crown Castle or Mobilitie may be interested in a single location – but the first one to submit will typically get it.  In this case, the City of Orlando has required a separation distance between poles such that Mobilitie will be required to either co-locate on the Crown Castle pole (which is next to impossible) or find another pole outside the area of separation.

This is concerning. I totally understand the eyesore concerns. But CCI/Verizon has already grabbed so many prime locations that this rule, if adopted by other cities, could really muck up competition. And isn't there something in the telecom act of '96 that says you can't deny permits on the basis of "another carrier already offers service here"? Not sure if that applies here since these will be mostly for capacity, but it could probably be argued in a court if the city explicitly states something along the lines of "it's first-come-first-served" since small cells AFAIK are not co-locatable.

 

Which brings me to another point. Carriers do need to figure something out for eyesore and redundancy concerns.

 

(Of course this wouldn't be an issue with shared infrastructure which would pretty much solve all of these problems, but I don't want to get into politics.)

 

Stackable pole antennas. Shared antennas. Something. This problem is just gonna get bigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's just me, but wouldn't all poles at a consistent height be less of an eyesore than having sporadically placed poles that are much taller than others?  In which case, the more the merrier!

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Rootmetrics released all 1st half 2016 airport reports. Sprint did decent. Lots of 2nd place and 3rd place finishes, marked improvement for sure.

 

I don't seem to see them. Maybe error on their part?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you see the 2015 airport reports at least?

 

Oh sorry, I glossed over a rather important word - 'airport.' I do see a lot more 2016 entries, but a slew of 2015 too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As i am sitting in one of my favorite in the middle of the east valley to eat, right next to a tower that hasn't even seen NV 1.0 upgrades yet, i have a hard time believing Sprint is still planning on being the number one or two network in 80 percent of markets .

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As i am sitting in one of my favorite in the middle of the east valley to eat, right next to a tower that hasn't even seen NV 1.0 upgrades yet, i have a hard time believing Sprint is still planning on being the number one or two network in 80 percent of markets .

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

 

Not sure where you are, but I see a permit has been pulled for one of them that seems telecom-esque. Phoenix's permitting site isn't being nice right now though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Figured I'd make mention of it in here too...

 

I spotted the 3rd carrier of B41 in the North Wisconsin market last night!!

 

If you're a premier sponsor, I posted it in our market thread or click here. (If not, now's a good time to donate!)

 

This totally caught me off guard. I wasn't really expecting it for awhile here because only large cities have had it been spotted, so this was quite awesome to see. It also shows that Sprint as a whole is really starting to get the ball rolling again on work now that it's nice out! Can't wait to see what other changes come our way... :)

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...