Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Why is it the same people who complain about everything Sprint does are the big complainers in this thread too? Just an observation.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Analysts: Sprint's new shared data plans not disruptive enough to change its fortunes

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/analysts-sprints-new-shared-data-plans-not-disruptive-enough-change-its-for/2014-08-19

 

This was my gut feeling last night and I still feel this way.  Waiting to see what they still have to offer later in the week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Analysts: Sprint's new shared data plans not disruptive enough to change its fortunes

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/analysts-sprints-new-shared-data-plans-not-disruptive-enough-change-its-for/2014-08-19

 

This was my gut feeling last night and I still feel this way.  Waiting to see what they still have to offer later in the week. 

Analysts should probably wait for this part of the article:  "Claure also said Sprint would reveal new plans for individual subscribers later this week."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it the same people who complain about everything Sprint does are the big complainers in this thread too? Just an observation.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

I'm complaining, but support and encourage them a lot. ;-)

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

how do these new plans stack with employee discount?

 

with the Everything family i get my employee discount off the first/primary line, data is not discounted at all.

 

 

So does the new plan discount the $100 data pack portion? or 1 line of the $25/$15/$40 portion? 

 

If the latter, this basically nerf employee discount into uselessness.

 

 

like hescominsoon, I can't see this new plan being more cost effective than the Everything Family plan... even during the discount/promotion period

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how do these new plans stack with employee discount?

 

with the Everything family i get my employee discount off the first/primary line, data is not discounted at all.

 

 

So does the new plan discount the $100 data pack portion? or 1 line of the $25/$15/$40 portion? 

 

If the latter, this basically nerf employee discount into uselessness

 

It seems to be consensus that there are no discounts on these plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to some pay sites they are suggesting its a good time for vzw/att shareholders to sell. As sprint is expected to drop some prices 15-25% which might give the duo no choice ...price war is coming...

 

I believe masa still wants Tmo...

sprint/Tmo can't win a price war the the 2.. As customers won't leave if they are offered a better deal through the duo.. Which will solidify mass sons point and make it easier to merge down the road.

 

I am sure many thought he was just over confident trying to just "buy"/whatever he wanted.. Now offering really cheap plans with minimal growth (unless sprint takes off) would be icing on the cake...

 

Sprint can't compete with the big 2 head to head. At least not for awhile.

 

Who has the most $$finacial backing sprint or Tmo? With the dropping of prices one of these companies will eventually suffer seriously ... In the mean time its great for us.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

how do these new plans stack with employee discount?

 

with the Everything family i get my employee discount off the first/primary line, data is not discounted at all.

 

 

So does the new plan discount the $100 data pack portion? or 1 line of the $25/$15/$40 portion?

 

If the latter, this basically nerf employee discount into uselessness

AT&T, VZW, and TMO use the data portion so the $100 item.

 

But sprint doesn't have this yet. Msybe as the week goes on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Analysts: Sprint's new shared data plans not disruptive enough to change its fortunes

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/analysts-sprints-new-shared-data-plans-not-disruptive-enough-change-its-for/2014-08-19

 

This was my gut feeling last night and I still feel this way.  Waiting to see what they still have to offer later in the week. 

 

Sprint stock is down right now...not shocking really. Wish Sprint would have made all their announcements at once, instead of piece meal them over several days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm complaining, but support and encourage them a lot. ;-)

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Sprint? Or the complainers? :lol:

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint stock is down right now...not shocking really. Wish Sprint would have made all their announcements at once, instead of piece meal them over several days.

Sprint stock is definitely going down. They are giving away their margins.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BGR article on new Sprint's plans isn't positive...nothing about prices, all related to Sprint's "dilapidated network".

 

http://bgr.com/2014/08/19/sprint-vs-t-mobile-network/

 

Link to RootMetrics report that puts Sprint in last place now: http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/special-report-2014-1h-us

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about BGR not being a great source of journalism...but it's a very popular site read by many folks. And the RootMetric's report indicates that Sprint's network isn't much improved since their last report (which I know isn't true for my area).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am still sticking with my 1500 shared data plan until the day I die. I'll pay full retail for my next iPhone before I loose this plan lol.

Yeah. I finally just recently was able to get my framily full. $35 for unlimited talk/text and 3gb data is perfect for me. I hope the individual plans they are announcing will be close to this. Only problem with framily is pricing is not locked in and it's not clear if adding new members will be allowed going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. I finally just recently was able to get my framily full. $35 for unlimited talk/text and 3gb data is perfect for me. I hope the individual plans they are announcing will be close to this. Only problem with framily is pricing is not locked in and it's not clear if adding new members will be allowed going forward.

 

you can still add members to Framily, the plan is just not marketed anymore, at least according to FierceWireless article

 

"Sprint will continue to allow customers to add subscribers to their Framily plan, but Sprint will stop marketing the Framily plans"

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/analysts-sprints-new-shared-data-plans-not-disruptive-enough-change-its-for/2014-08-19

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BGR, was once a great publication.

 

Agree now its a muck raker

 

Yeah.  I remember back when BlackBerry was in their hayday his phone reviews were must read.  He also had very good contacts in the industry, especally at RIM.  But I think his contacts have dried up as that site is rarely right about much anymore (remember the infamous Sprint exclusive iPhone 5) and has resorted to clickbait headlines that simply inflame fanboys. 

 

Throwback Tuesday:

 

Sprint scores iPhone 5 exclusive thanks to $20 billion deal with Apple?

http://bgr.com/2011/10/03/sprint-guarantees-to-buy-over-20-billion-in-iphones-from-apple-launching-the-iphone-5-exclusively/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BGR, was once a great publication.

 

Agree now its a muck raker

Techno Buffalo is not much better either. They use to be a lot better in the previous years. Now the comment section is full of trolls. I use to like the verge, but they have gotten very political. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. I remember back when BlackBerry was in their hayday his phone reviews were must read. He also had very good contacts in the industry, especally at RIM. But I think his contacts have dried up as that site is rarely right about much anymore (remember the infamous Sprint exclusive iPhone 5) and has resorted to clickbait headlines that simply inflame fanboys.

 

Throwback Tuesday:

Sprint scores iPhone 5 exclusive thanks to $20 billion deal with Apple?

http://bgr.com/2011/10/03/sprint-guarantees-to-buy-over-20-billion-in-iphones-from-apple-launching-the-iphone-5-exclusively/

Well the Boy Genius, left BGR a couple years ago I think. and sold the site.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...