Jump to content

Shentel / Sprint LTE - (was ntelos - West & N&W Virginia)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

There have been no reports here of nTelos broadcasting anything but 1900. Your post stated 700 and that it was not NV compliant which was one of the criteria set by Sprint under the agreement.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is running on 1900, then that is the only spectrum that will be broadcast for Sprint Users in the nTelos area.

 

I was going off of, This https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LTE_networks

About where are you located?

 

I'm looking up at the FCC licenses and note that 698-704 belongs to USCC in most of Virginia and the rest of the 700 allocations belong to Att or Verizon (band 17/13). Ntelos has a full 30 mhz pcs band 2 allocation and 20 MHz AWS Band 4. They also have some short term spectrum leases from sprint for PCS, smr, and ebs/Brs.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

Edit: Saw it's Roanoke and yeah looks like USCC owns the 700 mhz Spectrum there. Maybe he was talking about a roaming agreement with USCC Band 12 700 mhz?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to him NV isn't coming for a long time, I mentioned the agreement at first which led to him saying that comment. This is news from a guy he is buddy buddy with so I'm not trying to get him or I in trouble. We were simply talking about 700mhz spectrum because this is what I assumed nTelos owned from that wiki article I had read. So he made no mention of 700mhz spectrum at all from the get go.

 

As far as I know, he's not a very technical guy, just a sprint guy. I asked him for dates, he couldn't supply. But this was information regarding the LTE coming to SW VA from a guy higher than your standard store representative or managers etc. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I'm hearing conflicting info here, which just adds to my frustration. Any legitimate classifications will be welcomed! (Especially pertaining to timing)

 

Sent from my HTC One M9 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last I heart about CCA no Sprint phone was compliant with it.

 

This really isn't anything new just more smoke and mirrors from a Sprint representative. I wouldn't be surprised if Marcello himself was as clueless on nTelos agreement as we were and what all is going on. It's probably not going to happen until 2017 on their deadline still unfinished but launched to prevent the fall of nTelos.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last I heart about CCA no Sprint phone was compliant with it.

 

This really isn't anything new just more smoke and mirrors from a Sprint representative. I wouldn't be surprised if Marcello himself was as clueless on nTelos agreement as we were and what all is going on. It's probably not going to happen until 2017 on their deadline still unfinished but launched to prevent the fall of nTelos.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Plenty of phones are fully CCA compatible and has been for the longest time. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Driving up to Pittsburgh, PA from Johnson City, TN this weekend.  Looks like 85%+ of this drive is going to be in nTelos land... wish me luck :/  Last time I was up in SWVA the service was insanely bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Driving up to Pittsburgh, PA from Johnson City, TN this weekend. Looks like 85%+ of this drive is going to be in nTelos land... wish me luck :/ Last time I was up in SWVA the service was insanely bad.

Thanks for reminding us.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Driving up to Pittsburgh, PA from Johnson City, TN this weekend.  Looks like 85%+ of this drive is going to be in nTelos land... wish me luck :/  Last time I was up in SWVA the service was insanely bad.

 

It's not 85%, once you leave wytheville until you get to around harrisonburg. 

 

It will go Sprint, Ntelos, and Shentel so it won't be that awful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not 85%, once you leave wytheville until you get to around harrisonburg. 

 

It will go Sprint, Ntelos, and Shentel so it won't be that awful. 

 

If I wanted to take an extra 1-2 hours to get to Pittsburgh, I would be passing through Harrisonburg.  The fastest route is to go through WV.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright I got some good news everyone. Apparently after my talk the other day with the higher up we have been provided a direct email address to get some quick and compliant answers. I just sent off the email so as soon as I receive an update, i'll be updating you as well. I apologize, I'm not trying to "smoke and mirrors" Just trying to get new information and make myself as intelligent on the subject as I can be, while corresponding to you all what ever I may know in a timely fashion. As I work for Sprint, i usually see and hear things first.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What app for android app do I need to screen shot what LTE band I am on now?

 

Engineering screens are the only way to be certain, since that data is not exported to public Android APIs, although most of the apps out there (SCP, LTE Discovery, my crapola app) have heuristics that can make pretty good guesses for existing networks based on patterns observed in the field.

 

(I say this because nTelos' LTE rollout for Sprint customers may not fit the established patterns for cell IDs, particularly if it includes access to towers that nTelos has upgraded using the different equipment from that Sprint and Shentel use. So the apps may work, but they may not.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just confirmed LTE Launch in nTelos land this Fall. That's really all I believe I can say.

Is that specifically for the Roanoke area, or maybe broader in nTelos-land??

 

Sent from my HTC One M9 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just confirmed LTE Launch in nTelos land this Fall. That's really all I believe I can say.

What is your source? Sorry I've heard so many false statements regarding this.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...